Rejected! The resolution to force Trump to end Iran strikes

The Senate rejected a resolution Wednesday to block President Donald Trump from ordering further strikes on Iran, declined to halt a war that Trump started without the consent of Congress. Democrats along with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) forced a vote on the war powers resolution over the opposition of most Republicans, who control the Senate. Democrats implored a handful of Republicans to break with their party to end the conflict and reassert Congress’s control over declaring war.

“This essentially is the vote whether to go to war or not,” Paul told reporters. But Paul was the only Republican who voted to advance the resolution, which failed 47-53 on a procedural vote. One Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) voted against it.

The vote was the latest setback in Democrats’ long-shot strategy to block Trump from ordering military strikes without authorization from Congress. They have forced votes on eight war power resolutions in the House and Senate a record for a single Congress since Trump returned to office in an attempt to block him from striking Venezuela, Iran and boats near Latin America suspected of smuggling drugs. All of them have failed. Republicans in Congress broadly support Trump’s decision to strike Iran, though a few have raised concerns about Congress’s lack of involvement.

“Yes, I wish I would have been consulted,” Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah) said in a statement. “I wish my vote would have been asked for before this. But the President did act within his legal bounds to do what he has done.”

Curtis and other Republicans argued that ordering the withdrawal of U.S. forces from the war days after it started would send the wrong message. Sen. Todd Young (R-Indiana) said he wished in retrospect that Congress had done more to assert its authority before the strikes.

“We should’ve been holding hearings and asking probing questions and making the case to get a greater measure of unity around this operation on the front end,” Young told reporters ahead of the vote. “But here we are. We’re at war.”

Democrats countered that it was not too late to halt a war it did not authorize.

“We must act to stop Trump’s belligerence,” Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-New York) said on the Senate floor before the vote. “The American people will be watching how senators vote. History will judge this chamber for how we act.”

Democrats have argued that Americans do not want to be ensnared in another war in the Middle East, but early polls have presented a less clear picture of how the public views the war. A CNN poll found 59 percent of Americans disapproved of the decision to strike Iran and 41 percent approved. But a Fox News poll found registered voters evenly split: 50 percent approved and 50 percent disapproved. Several other surveys including a Washington Post flash poll have found results in between the CNN and Fox polls.

Many Democrats have compared Trump’s strikes on Iran to the Iraq War, although President George W. Bush sought and received authorization from Congress before the U.S. invasion in 2003. Trump has not asked for authorization to strike Iran, and Democrats warned that failing to rein him in now could set a precedent.

“If we vest the sole power to make war in the president of the United States, the sole decision to bring a country into war with the president of the United States, there is no check on the use of that authority, there is no check on the abuse of that authority,”

Sen. Adam Schiff (D-California) who introduced the resolution with Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Virginia), Paul and Schumer said on the Senate floor before the vote. The House is set to vote Thursday on a similar war powers resolution, which Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) said he believes he has the votes to defeat.

“The idea that we would take the ability of our commander in chief … to finish this job is a frightening prospect to me,” Johnson told reporters. “It’s dangerous, and I am certainly hopeful and I believe we do have the votes to put it down.”

The War Powers Resolution, which Congress passed in 1973 in response to the Vietnam War, allows a single lawmaker to force a vote to withdraw U.S. forces from a conflict or to block strikes when hostilities are imminent. But even if Congress passed such a resolution, it would stand little chance of forcing Trump to end the war with Iran because he could veto it. Overriding a veto would require a two-thirds majority in both chambers. No war powers resolution has ever overcome a veto.

Kaine and Paul waited for weeks to force the vote as Trump massed U.S. forces near Iran, even as the two countries continued to negotiate over Iran’s nuclear program. Kaine said last week that he wanted the vote to happen before any strikes because it would increase its odds of passage.

But at least two House Democrats said they would oppose the resolution if their colleagues forced a vote on it while negotiations were ongoing, making it hard for Democrats to get the timing right. Kaine said before Wednesday’s vote that he would file more resolutions to end the conflict in Iran if the vote failed. The Senate and House votes this week are “the first effort of all Congress going on the record about this, but I can assure you it’s not going to be the last,” he told reporters.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) argued before the vote that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 was unconstitutional and suggested another way that Democrats could force an end to the conflict so by refusing to vote for legislation funding it. Democrats might get such an opportunity soon if the administration asks Congress for more money to prosecute the war.

“If you want to stop this war, say we will not pay for it,” Graham said on the Senate floor. “I would not agree with you, but at least it would be constitutional.”

The 1973 law also requires the president to withdraw forces after 60 days or 90 days if the president seeks an extension unless Congress declares war or authorizes the use of military force. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) said he does not believe the Trump administration needed to seek authorization to continue the Iran campaign even if it lasts for longer than 90 days.

“I think the president has the authority that he needs to conduct the activities, the operations that are currently underway there,” - Thune told reporters.

But Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) said he believed Trump would need to seek authorization from Congress if he wanted to deploy ground troops in Iran, which the administration has not ruled out.

“Most American presidents have said, ‘Listen, if I’m going to commit ground troops into combat, that constitutes war in the constitutional sense and would require some sort of authorization,’” Hawley told reporters. “I think that’s a pretty tried-and-tested line.”

Mike Johnson clears up remarks that President Donald Trump was an “FBI informant” in the Jeffrey Epstein case!

This is pretty much what we have been saying for a while now and finally House Speaker Mike Johnson has come out to attempt to clear the air up on his earlier remarks, claiming that President Donald Trump had been an “FBI informant” in the Jeffrey Epstein case. 

Follow along here “What I was referring to in that long conversation was what the (Epstein) victims’ attorney said,” Johnson told reporters. “More than a decade ago, President Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago, and he was one of the only people, one of the only prominent people, as everyone has reported … that he was willing to help law enforcement go after this guy who was a disgusting child abuser, sex trafficker, all the allegations. That’s what they heard. So the president was helpful in that.”

This is exactly what we have always known about the Trump and Epstein connection and what Trump means by a "HOAX" but the speaker had to come out and once more make it clear for those who suffer from TDS. He also added: “I don’t know if I used the right terminology, but that’s common knowledge, and everybody knows that. So this is much ado about nothing.” Some had seized on Johnson’s comments on social media, seeking to paint Trump as a hero in relation to the case that has seen heightened national political furor in recent weeks. 

Pressed by CNN Monday on whether Trump had specifically told him about any involvement with law enforcement’s investigation of the late convicted sex offender, Johnson said he was “recounting what others have said” but that he and the president have spoken about “the Epstein evils many times.”

Also Speaker Johnson when asked, said he had no information about whether Trump had ever been asked to wear a wire. “I was repeating what has been common knowledge for a long time. The president was helpful in trying to get Epstein for the law enforcement to go after Epstein. That’s always been my understanding. That’s common knowledge. It’s the public’s understanding. I was not breaking news there, OK? What I’m trying to emphasize is that the president is as disgusted about this as everyone is.” Speaking with reporters at the Capitol last week, Johnson defended the president’s handling of the Epstein files and said he helped law enforcement in the case.

“He’s not saying that what Epstein did is a hoax. It’s a terrible, unspeakable evil. He believes that himself. When he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago. He was an FBI informant to try to take this stuff down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered these unspeakable harms.” 

Asked at the time to clarify the comment a spokesman for the speaker’s office said in a statement that Johnson was “reiterating what the victims’ attorney said, which is that Donald Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago was the only one more than a decade ago willing to help prosecutors expose Epstein for being a disgusting child predator.” The White House declined to comment on the matter.

Brad Edwards, a lawyer for numerous Epstein abuse victims, implored the president last week to back survivors’ push for transparency around the case, saying Trump had helped him with his investigation of the case in 2009. At the time, Trump was not in public office and Epstein had just been sentenced to 18 months in a minimum-security prison for his crimes with minors as part of a plea deal that has since faced significant criticism for being too lenient.

“So at this point in time, I would hope that he would revert back to what he was saying to get elected, which is, ‘I want transparency.’ This about face that occurred, none of us understand it,” he continued than on Monday indicated that House Oversight Chairman James Comer and committee members were planning to visit the Epstein estate in Florida to view visitor logs as part of their probe into the case. 

As CNN has reported, a bipartisan group of House Oversight staffers are expected to travel to New York City this week to meet with lawyers representing Epstein’s estate to view unredacted documents related to the case.

As more becomes known we will keep you informed.

President Trump issues warning to Fraud Squad head AOC after impeachment push

Ok so our President Donald Trump called out the village idiot Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) to try impeaching him, and said the democratic socialist should be more focused on keeping hold of her seat instead. Ocasio-Cortez, also known as AOC, had said Trump's ordering of strikes on Iran without congressional approval was grounds for his impeachment. She forgets that well Trump is not the only President to do this but the's an complete fail so she needed to be reminded that "She better start worrying about her own Primary, before she thinks about beating our Great Palestinian Senator, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, whose career is definitely on very thin ice!" Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

"She and her Democrat friends have just hit the Lowest Poll Numbers in Congressional History, so go ahead and try Impeaching me, again, MAKE MY DAY!" Trump told our favorite big booty Latina! And AOC fired back at Trump on X, on Tuesday afternoon saying, "Mr. President, don't take your anger out on me I'm just a silly girl. Take it out on whoever convinced you to betray the American people and our Constitution by illegally bombing Iran and dragging us into war. It only took you 5 months to break almost every promise you made." See this is how these con-women in congress do! They talk trash, lie, and talk bad about TRUMP ALL DAY! The moment that he says anything they're on "Victim" mode and act like he's the badguy. LOL They think we still fall for this con.

But anyway Saturday, the president announced strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan in response to the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, a U.S. ally. On June 13, Israel struck Tehran, Iran's capital, and other cities to disrupt its nuclear capabilities, and Iran retaliated with strikes of its own, the majority of which were intercepted by Israeli defense systems. Just in the past 24 hours, a U.S.-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Iran was announced by President Trump, following a 12-day conflict marked by U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites and Iranian missile attacks on Israel and a U.S. base in Qatar. Despite the ceasefire, both nations have accused each other of violations, with continued missile exchanges and airstrikes casting doubt on the truce's stability.

The U.S. House voted decisively Tuesday to halt an attempt to impeach President Trump on a single charge of abuse of power, stemming from his decision to launch military strikes on Iran without prior congressional approval. The unexpected move, initiated by caveman look alike and moron Rep. Al Green of Texas, a Democrat, who is mindless, and looks like he hasn't showered in months! But somehow he sparked minimal debate but revealed divisions within his party which is good as not many even on his side think this will work. While most Democrats sided with Republicans to table the resolution, dozens supported Green's push. The final vote was 344-79.

Democrats have been split on Trump's response since Saturday's strikes. AOC said this weekend's attack was "disastrous," writing on X, that it was "a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers." LOL Yeah "Disastrous" to IRAN Nuke plans! So AOC pipe down please your low IQ is just mind blowing at how you got in that seat you take up... Someone has to answer how much they paid to get you there because it wasn't due to how smart you are. This idiot said on X, "The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers. He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment." 

Yeah no it's not AOC and you didn't say a thing when Biden did it or Obama did it. Well you might have still been a Bar Tender and Stripper when Obama did it. But Khanna, along with Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, introduced a bipartisan War Powers Resolution last Tuesday in a bid to curb Trump's ability to escalate tensions with Iran.

Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, also ripped Trump on X, writing that he "struck Iran without any authorization of Congress. We need to immediately return to DC and vote on @RepThomasMassie and my War Powers Resolution to prevent America from being dragged into another endless Middle East war." Massie, a longtime thorn in the president's side, and Trump continue to trade barbs on social media over his use of military action. Senator John Fetterman, a Pennsylvania Democrat, came to Trump's side and wrote on X, "As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS. Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities. I'm grateful for and salute the finest military in the world." 

This is not shocking as John Fetterman has been a strong supporter of Israel amid the ongoing war in Gaza and has recently called for the U.S. to provide the country with weaponry, intelligence and military assistance to strike Iran. What People Are Saying Green said ahead of Tuesday's vote, "I take no delight in what I'm doing. I do this because no one person should have the power to take over 300 million people to walk without consulting with the Congress of the United States of America. I do this because I understand that the Constitution is going to be meaningful or it's going to be meaningless."

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican from Georgia, also criticized Ocasio-Cortez, writing on X on Saturday: "Shut up you pathetic little hypocrite. YOU fully supported our military and IC running the proxy war against Russia in Ukraine. And you VOTED to fund the Ukraine war under your President with dementia. You don't get to play anti-war and moral outrage anymore." To which here we say THIS YOU MTG! We needed someone to call AOC that way and House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said Tuesday: "Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument. They think it's a violation of the Article 2 powers of the commander in chief. I think that's right."

Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota reposted a video of Johnson's remarks on X, and said, "Imagine being in Congress and arguing against Congressional authority. They're ready to throw away their own war powers just so Trump can bomb whoever he wants with zero oversight. We've truly lost the plot." What we think is someone needs to stick a WMD up her tight asshole. 

This moron can't be deported? Why?

AL GREEN CENSURED for Outburst at Trump Speech!

Time this moron is removed from all politics as AL Green is one of the worst people on Congress. This guy looks filthy, and acts like how he looks. Like he's been rolling around in cow shit. Now this was bipartisan by both sides of lawmakers who voted to censure Representative Al Green following his outburst during President Donald Trump's address to a joint session of Congress.

A rare rebuke, censuring does not remove a member from office but serves as a formal statement of disapproval with potential political consequences. Green, a Democrat from Texas, was disciplined for shouting at Trump during his speech and was asked to be removed from the chamber by House Speaker Mike Johnson. Green has been a longtime critic of Trump, having filed multiple impeachment resolutions against the president, including one after his outburst. Following the vote, Green defended his actions, saying he "was making it clear to the president that he has no mandate to cut Medicaid." 

Censure is a formal and public reprimand issued by a legislative body to express disapproval of a member's actions. Unlike expulsion, it does not remove the individual from office but serves as a condemnation that can impact their influence and reputation in the House. Green's actions have sparked debate about the boundaries of political protest within Congress, particularly during high-profile addresses by the president. His supporters argue that his protest was justified, while critics including members of his party viewed it as an inappropriate breach of protocol.

Approximately 10 House Democrats voted with several Republicans for Green's reprimand. 

Those who voted in favor included:

1. Ed Case of Hawaii
2. Tom Suozzi of New York
3. Jim Costa of California
4. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington
5. Jared Moskowitz of Florida
6. Ami Bera of California
7. Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania
8. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio
9. Laura Gillen of New York
10. Jim Himes of Connecticut

Some of these representatives hail from swing districts or moderate-leaning constituencies, which went red for Trump in the 2024 election.

Green is not the first lawmaker to disrupt a president during a congressional address. In 2009, Representative Joe Wilson, a South Carolina Republican, shouted "You lie!" at then-President Barack Obama during a speech on health care reform. The House later reprimanded Wilson. More recently, in 2024 and 2023, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, interrupted then-President Joe Biden during his State of the Union address. She did not face formal censure.

Which Other Politicians Have Been Censured?

Historically, only a handful of lawmakers have faced this formal rebuke. One of the most recent cases before Green was Republican Representative Paul Gosar of Arizona, who was censured in 2021 after posting an animated video that depicted violence against Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat.

The move to censure Gosar was supported mainly by Democrats, with only two Republicans voting in favor. In 2023, Democratic Representative Rashida Tlaib of Michigan was censured for her remarks regarding the Israel-Hamas conflict. The resolution accused her of promoting rhetoric that was deemed antisemitic by critics. Another prominent censure occurred in 2010, when Democratic Representative Charles Rangel of New York was censured for 11 ethics violations related to tax evasion and improper use of congressional resources. The House overwhelmingly voted to censure Rangel.

What's Next for Al Green?

Green has vowed to continue speaking out against Trump and his policies. However, the censure could impact his standing within the Democratic Party and among key House committees. Historically, censured lawmakers have faced challenges securing leadership positions and committee assignments. Meanwhile, the broader conversation about decorum in Congress is likely to continue.

Ilhan Omar to be deported?

They need to stop messing around with this evil clown Ilhan Omar. She needs to be sent packing back to Somalia and never allowed back into this country as she is clearly an enemy of this country. How she's being voted into office is beyond me as she's not doing a good job in any capacity and has shown flashes of being pure evil and corrupt. Now with Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) circulating a petition for his supporters to sign to deport Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) needs to happen. Gil had previously called on Omar to be deported, arguing she is more loyal to undocumented immigrants in the United States from her native Somalia than to the United States. The petition and an email circulated by Gill were first reported by Axios. 

Omar became a U.S. citizen in 2000 after fleeing her native country due to civil war. The Minnesota representative has been the target of Republican insults following her staunch criticism of President Trump during his first administration. “Friend, we should have never let Ilhan Omar into our country. And frankly, America would be a much better place if she were to be sent back to Somalia,” Gill wrote in the email which included a picture of him next to President Trump. As in the past, he criticized Omar for discussing how to evade Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. “Recently, it came out that Ilhan Omar is hosting free workshops for Somalians, who are in our country illegally, on how to evade ICE and deportation. It could not be more blatant: Ilhan Omar is more loyal to illegal Somalians than she is to the United States, or the office she was elected to,” he added. Several Democrats criticized the most recent remarks by Gil, a freshman member of the new Congress. 

“⁦@SpeakerJohnson⁩, get control of your caucus before we have to take other actions. This is demeaning & embarrassing,” Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wisc.) said in a post on X. “We all need to be better than this shit. I expect an answer today.”

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) also raised concerns with the GOP member’s comments. “It’s disgusting that Republicans are attempting to raise money by threatening to deport a US citizen just because they disagree with her,” she wrote on X. “Ilhan Omar is a tireless advocate for her district, a fierce protector of our democracy, and I know these fascist threats won’t keep her down.”

But this corruption is not just her as we seen AOC the Village IDIOT in NY might end up in prison for doing webinars on helping illegals avoid ICE, and openly says to not follow the law of the land ON VIDEO. Hence why she really is The Village Idiot. Check out the video below... This is hilarious and scary.      

Mike Johnson wins reelection!

Republican Rep. Mike Johnson of Louisiana won reelection as speaker of the House on Friday, emerging victorious after a pair of GOP members switched their votes to deliver him a majority and open the 119th Congress. This was being debated on mostly in the lying mass media as they kept saying he wouldn't win that there was no unity in the party, and he would lose to and thus losing the job to a crazy lying lunatic radical leftist or Rino. But as Johnson said "there were no deals cut" Johnson said he took "suggestions and requests from all members on process reforms" but "there were no deals cut" to secure the gavel.

"We made no deals to anyone, no quid pro quo for anybody on any position or anything at all through the entire I haven't done that in 14 months and I was not about to start today," he said. The Louisiana Republican said he was "100%" confident that he will remain speaker throughout the entire 119th Congress. Johnson needed 218 votes to secure the gavel, and at first appeared to fall two votes short. He huddled with allies and conservative members for about an hour as he seemed headed for defeat. A dramatic scene played out when two of the holdouts Reps. Keith Self and Ralph Norman eventually approached the dais and switched their votes, putting Johnson over the top.

Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky was the only remaining Republican defector. After the vote, Self and Norman told reporters they spoke to Johnson and President-elect Donald Trump, who stressed the need for party unity. They both said Johnson reassured them that he would fight to advance Trump's agenda with Republicans in control of Congress and the White House. A multi-round speaker's election threatened to derail the first day of the new Congress, but Johnson's victory allows the GOP majority to move on to other matters, including the counting of the Electoral College votes on Monday, Jan. 6. Trump endorsed Johnson earlier this week, boosting his candidacy after some conservatives expressed doubts about his ability to lead the GOP conference.

Here are all the updates from a chaotic day on Capitol Hill as the house voted 215 to 209 to adopt new rules to govern the lower chamber for the next two years. House Republicans released their proposed rules package on Wednesday, which included a number of changes to the rules that governed the House during the last two years. In an attempt to avoid some of the chaos that plagued the Republican majority in the last Congress, Republicans raised the threshold to force a vote on ousting the House speaker to nine GOP members. The previous threshold was one member. 

Leadership unveiled a new package Friday that added, "The Speaker may not entertain a motion that the House suspend the rules except on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays." Under suspension of the rules, House leaders can bring legislation to the floor without going through the Rules Committee, where a handful of conservatives have blocked legislation from advancing in recent years.

The procedure is often used to fast-track legislation that has bipartisan support since it requires two-thirds of the chamber to pass. The new rules would prohibit that from taking place on Thursdays and Fridays. The package also eliminates the Office of Diversity and Inclusion, restores "family-centric language" and authorizes subpoenas of Attorney General Merrick Garland and other Justice Department officials as part of Republicans' investigations into the Biden family. It also changes the name of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and renames the Office of Congressional Ethics to the Office of Congressional Conduct.

Rep. Ralph Norman, the other GOP holdout, confirmed that he spoke with Trump before switching his vote, and received "assurances" that Johnson would "fight." which is something I figured would be the end resault as I personally understand where Johnson was before as he didn't have the backing of the White House and had to negotiate the best he could considering how evil these radical libs are. So while and I quote here he said "We had a talk with President Trump. We got in there I never know how this stuff's going to come out. I didn't know how people were going to vote," he told CBS News. "Mike gave us his assurances he's going to fight for the things we think are important to the country," he added. "And was it worth taking another hour? Yes. And so, I'm excited with the way it came out, and Mike is too."

All I can say is that I can't wait til Trump is back in the white house... But since TRUMP recently won the a case against Disney and ABC for lying I think it's time that he does another case and this time it's against someone in the liberal left who lied on both tv, and in congress and contradicted himself. Time he is put into court... Hakeem Jeffries this is going to you and I'd say "SIR" but I don't respect this idiotic person enough to say "SIR" this guy is a "FU---NG IDIOT!" And I say this with full conviction folks, and if you think I'm playing when I declare him stupid just do some homework on this truly idiotic moron, and here a complete lie by him which is not holding up well since 2017, and hope it gets him into legal issues. Everyone on the left who lies, and pushes these Russian lies need to be checked, and exposed.

HERE is video proof of how they lie... Check it out below.



Johnson says he told holdouts they can "hold me accountable" Johnson spoke to a group of reporters at the Capitol and described his conversations with Self and Norman, the Republicans who switched their votes. "I told them they can be assured that we're going to have different processes and procedures this time around, because it's unified government, and Republicans have control of the Senate and the White House and the House, so it's a very different situation than last Congress was, and they can hold me accountable for that," the speaker said. 

"We're going to have a member-driven, bottom-up process for the development of this really important legislation. And we must succeed, we have no margin for error. So, that's all it was. No promises," Johnson added. Johnson confirmed to CBS News that he spoke with Trump while the speaker ship vote was being held open. Trump's message, Johnson said, was: "Get united."

End the UFO/UAP EMBARGO NOW!

The Truth is out there is the theme, and tagline to my all time favorite tv show "The X-Files" starring David Duchovny & Gillian Anderson. This show was created by Chris Carter who came up with this fantastic show and inputed some of the ufology's biggest stories, and also his own spin on these stories. Now not the entire series was based on UFO's and Aliens but this was the core of the story for Fox Mulder (David Duchovny) who got into the FBI because he wanted to find out what happened to his sister the night she was "taken" by what he came to believe were Aliens which were working with a secret part of the government which had hidden agendas towards keeping the world in what my good friend Stephen Bassett calls "The UFO Embargo" which some say is 80 year plus old... I believe it to be over 100 years old, and perhaps even predates the formation of these United States.



 While it's not clear how long the current people in people have known, and why they're still keeping this secret other than for the industrial mulitary complex which runs things to use these techonological advancements to themselves for future weapons against both our Earthly enemies, and those from other worlds. Some say that the reason this whole thing has been such a taboo subject and why the current people aren't being told the entire truth is due to the "fear" the truth would cause with both common folks and the power structures such as religions, governments and sciencetists. While this might have been true 100 years ago today's people are well aware for the most part that things are what it seems with the subject.

Now that we have been told by our own people that both "Area 51" is real, and "UFO's" or "UAP's" as they have been now labeled are real there has been for sometime a wait on more info coming out to us the people who have spent who knows how much of our tax money on secret projects, and an on going coverup which has lasted way too long. For me the "Truth is out there" but it's not about the "Aliens, UFO's" or anything like that but the "Truth" I'm talking about is the "WHY ARE THEY STILL COVERING IT UP?"

Time is not on the side of the older people in power as they will die like all humans one day do and so keeping the bit lie about this is beyond stupid at this point. Just to me there should be no more wait, and they need to just release all the data, files, pictures, videos, and all the bodies, and crafts to show the public. Time to end the embargo and time for the truth to come out... Now the book "Behold A Pale Horse" as you know is from William "Bill" Cooper whos been dead for decades now but he wrote that book in the 90s and it talks about a "false flag ufo invasion" so I hope that this isn't what we have instore for us in 2024 as I sit here writing this in 2023... The facts are what they are but what we don't need is a fake invasion or a pretend war. We need the facts and we need to know this in a peacefull way. I'm not going to ask for anyone to be sent to prison over them keeping this secret as this doesn't solve any issues.

Just let's drop the lies, and the act... Now we also know recently the congress and senate have been talking more and more about this subject and both sides seem to agree the time to reveal the truth is here but remember with these radical leftists democrats nothing is what it seems. Not even in the subjects like these. While Chuck Schummer says he's pro ending the embargo it seems Matt Gaetz is claming that is the current bill Schummer is trying to pass will not give us the answers we want but would place this in a place like the JFK files were we would have to wait 25 years and it would cost billions to just tell us what we already know.

This is a waste of time, and money... Time to just spill the beans, and let the people of Earth know the truth and get on with the show of engaging the world with these facts. Here is a tweet by Tucker Carlson with video talking about this very subject on his now big time X.com (Formerly known as "Twitter") show.

In July, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), along with a bipartisan group of five other senators, announced sweeping legislation to declassify and release government information about unidentified flying objects.

Ep. 42 For more than 80 years, the US government has hidden the existence of UFOs. The question is why. The answer is ominous. pic.twitter.com/JMskiaBEmR

— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) November 29, 2023

The announcement coincided with, and seemed to corroborate, an extraordinary series of UFO-related developments. But now, Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio), Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.), Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-La.) appear poised to quash this bipartisan transparency initiative. In the absence of reasonable, good-faith objections to the core provisions of the historic legislation, the question is why. If there is nothing to hide and nothing to the UFO phenomenon, why would any member of Congress object to greater transparency and oversight of an executive branch prone to excessive and dangerous over-classification? 

Or perhaps there is something to hide. According to Schumer, a sweeping investigation “led some in Congress to believe that the executive branch was concealing important information regarding [UFOs] over broad periods of time.” This is corroborated by the inspector general of the intelligence community, who deemed a decorated whistleblower’s assertion that the government inappropriately concealed UFO-related information from Congress “credible and urgent.” Moreover, as Senate Intelligence Vice Chair Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) noted in extraordinary detail, several high-level officials with top security clearances have told congressional investigators of the existence of surreptitious government UFO retrieval and “reverse engineering” programs.

At the same time, 10 ex-government officials, military officers and scientists have alleged (or suggested) publicly that the U.S. government has recovered at least one UFO. In light of these remarkable developments, the overarching objectives of the Schumer-led Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act (UAPDA) are government transparency and the restoration of constitutionally-mandated congressional oversight. At its core, the UAPDA establishes that all government UFO records “carry a presumption of immediate disclosure.” Any records deemed too sensitive for immediate release would be subject to review by an independent nine-member panel. Following a recommendation from the panel, the president would decide whether, and when, to release any such documents or records. 

Perhaps most importantly, the UAPDA’s “controlled disclosure campaign” would require a benchmark-driven plan for the eventual public release of all UFO-related records or information, no matter how sensitive.

Key Republicans appear to object to the UAPDA on two grounds: The possible leak of classified information, and the possibility that the review board would duplicate other government UFO efforts. Neither objection holds water. First, the proposed records review board would be composed of “distinguished persons of high national professional reputation.” Each, along with board staff, would be required to hold top security clearances. Second, the president would retain ultimate authority to release any record or information deemed too sensitive to release immediately. These safeguards make an inadvertent leak of classified information extremely unlikely.

More importantly, if key Republicans succeed in neutering or quashing the UAPDA in its entirety, they may inadvertently spur the leak of sensitive information that they ostensibly fear. As Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.), a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, stated recently, new protections enacted by Congress resulted in “all sorts of [UFO whistleblowers] coming out of the woodwork.” These individuals, Gallagher said, are telling congressional investigators that “they’ve been part of this or that [UFO] program,” resulting in “a variety of pretty intense conversations.” Moreover, according to Sen. Rubio, “a lot of people… are starting to edge towards coming forward and we hear may be coming forward.” Without the UAPDA’s formal, controlled disclosure framework, frustrated whistle blowers may feel compelled to leak sensitive UFO-related information, potentially resulting in a “catastrophic” or “uncontrolled” disclosure. Separately, Republicans appear to object to the UAPDA on the grounds that the proposed review board would be duplicative of the government’s new UFO analysis office. For one, the office analyzes video and other data of UFO incidents reported by U.S. servicemembers. Such work is categorically different from the transparency-focused mission of the UAPDA-proposed review board.

More importantly, as former deputy assistant secretary of defense for intelligence Christopher Mellon aptly noted, asking the government’s UFO office to investigate allegations of illegality by the executive branch is akin to tasking intelligence agencies with investigating the Iran-Contra scandal. An independent body with presidential imprimatur is far better suited to the task of enforcing transparency, especially if an agency refuses to release relevant records. Moreover, any costs associated with the UAPDA’s nine-member review board would be minimal in the context of the entire defense budget. Ultimately, the dearth of sound objections to the bipartisan UAPDA raises several questions about the motivations of the Republicans now seeking to halt the legislation. Some of the most forceful opposition to the UAPDA appears to come from Turner, chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Of note, Turner represents the congressional district that includes Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, which features prominently — and infamously — in UFO history.

As physicist and hedge fund director Eric Weinstein noted, if members of Congress were to make a hypothetical “last ditch effort to scuttle” the disclosure of secret government UFO programs, he would have guessed that a congressman from Turner’s district would be involved. Moreover, with Republicans generally distrustful of government and seemingly natural ideological allies of any efforts to expose undue government secrecy, GOP opposition to the UAPDA is particularly perplexing. But thanks largely to social media, citizen advocacy and engagement is surging. 

Polished, nuanced guides to engaging Congress on the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act and calls to action have garnered millions of engagements. Rightfully so. With government secrecy potentially concealing the biggest story in human history, Americans of all political stripes should be vocal advocates for government accountability and transparency. Marik von Rennenkampff served as an analyst with the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation and was an Obama administration appointee at the U.S. Department of Defense.

Mike Johnson On Biden's Impeachment Inquiry Live

Finally it looks like the search for the truth against Joe Biden is being exposed! Mike Johnson is live talking on this right in the video below... This is Live!

LIVE: President Donald J. Trump Iowa - 10/29/23

LIVE: President Donald J. Trump to Deliver Remarks in Sioux City, Iowa - 10/29/23 and below is the video directly from RSBN which is a great conservative news outlet which doesn't censor TRUMP or the conservatives in the country like how it's done by the left driven mainstream outlets like "CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and yes for some part FOX News." Let's see what he says about MAGA Mike Johnson also taking the speaker of the house job. We here were pulling for Jim Jordan but Mike Johnson is a good option and much better than Kevin McCarthy who thanked Nancy Pelosi and she said she would help him out when needed. So he was without a doubt on her side.

President Donald J Trump makes his 12th visit to Iowa this year ahead of the January 15th Caucus. The president is scheduled to speak at 4 p.m. ET.

The broadcast is expected to begin at 12:00 p.m. ET.
Please note: the start time is subject to change as the event timeline is updated.

Like always our President will address the things we need done here in the country, and we hope he is able to speak on these fake charges and indictments against him without getting himself fined again.

Mike Johnson Elected As New House Speaker

Well it's finally happened! The Speaker is picked by the GOP and it's MAGA Mike himself! Yes folks a PRO TRUMP guy is in! Mike Johnson is now the Speaker and this is good news... Matt Gaetz, Jim Jordan were my two favorites for the job but Mike is a guy I think will be good in this role also. Matt Gaetz had this to say about this and he's right.

 “If you don’t think that moving from Kevin McCarthy to MAGA Mike Johnson shows the ascendance of this movement and where the power of the Republican Party truly lies, then you’re not paying attention.” - @RepMattGaetz

Rep. Matt Gaetz: The Swamp is on the Run

“If you don’t think that moving from Kevin McCarthy to MAGA Mike Johnson shows the ascendance of this movement and where the power of the Republican Party truly lies, then you’re not paying attention.” - @RepMattGaetz

Watch LIVE➡… pic.twitter.com/RHlZiBKcLn

— Real America's Voice (RAV) (@RealAmVoice) October 25, 2023 

Now to the RINOS I have to say I agree with Matt and hope the rest of these clowns in the GOP are paying attention. I'm a Trump supporter and will ONLY vote for him in 2024. Time for the DeSanctimonious, the Ramaswamy, and the rest of the clown show to now halt and back both TRUMP and Mike Johnson. 

You might ask well why is Mike known as being a "Trump Supporter" if you're not familiar with him. Well the most notable is his role in the rightful argument aimed at keeping Donald Trump in power even though he was cheated out the 2020 election as the rest of us know. 

A New York Times article last year called Johnson “the most important architect of the Electoral College objections” on Jan. 6, 2021. Which is music to my ears. So with t hat said I think now it's time to think about the next move.

Time to impeach JOE BIDEN no more "Inquiry" or any other bull... That was code from Kevin McCarthy saying "We ain't doing shit!" But without saying. Hope Mike learned we don't want a damn inquiry we want ACTION! Time to remove BIDEN, and HARRIS and stop the bleeding on what they're doing to this country.

Hope Jim Jordan is taking this well I'm sure he understands the GOP RINOS back stabbed him. Hope from here he takes no mercy on these clowns and exposes them all... Anyway here is more on Mike being granted the job of "Speaker."