Showing posts with label President Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label President Trump. Show all posts

Thursday, June 26, 2025

GE Appliances moves some production from China to Kentucky with $490M investment


Well looks like things are working well in the tariffs area as "GE" Appliances announced a nearly half-billion-dollar project. They said that it will create 800 new jobs and shift production of clothes washers from China to its massive manufacturing complex in Kentucky. The $490 million investment positions the Kentucky home appliances company to rank as the biggest U.S. manufacturer of washing machines, it said. “We are bringing laundry production to our global headquarters in Louisville because manufacturing in the U.S. is fundamental to our ‘zero-distance’ business strategy to make appliances as close as possible to our customers and consumers,” CEO Kevin Nolan said. “This decision is our most recent product re-shoring and aligns with the current economic and policy environment.”

The announcement comes as President Donald Trump attempts to lure factories back to the United States by imposing import taxes tariffs on foreign goods. He has slapped 10% tariffs on imports from most countries and put 30% levies on Chinese goods. GE Appliances says nearly all the steel used in its U.S. manufacturing for its appliances comes from American steelmakers. GE Appliances said the project will move production of a combo washer/dryer and a lineup of front load washers from China to the Bluegrass State. In all, production of more than 15 models of front load washers will shift to the company's sprawling Louisville production complex known as Appliance Park, it said. Once the added production is in place, the total area devoted to clothes care production at the Louisville complex will equal 33 football fields, it said.

Kentucky Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear, who has criticized Trump's tariffs, hailed the company's deepening commitment to the state. “Today's announcement brings more appliance manufacturing back to the United States and solidifies Kentucky and Louisville as the global headquarters of GE Appliances,” the governor said. The redesigned factory will become its most advanced manufacturing plant for clothes washing production, the company said, featuring the latest in automation, robotics and material-handling technologies including automated guided vehicles and autonomous mobile robots.

The new manufacturing lines will open in 2027, the company said. Next door at the complex's Building 1, the company produces top load washers and front load dryers. GE Appliances handles product design and engineering work at its Louisville headquarters but lacks overall production capacity to make all of its products at its U.S. plants. So it contracts with other manufacturers, including in China, for some of its production. The company said its core business strategy is to base production in the United States, and the investment announced Thursday is another step toward achieving that goal.

“Manufacturing in Louisville puts production closer to our designers, engineers and consumers so that together we can create our most innovative laundry platforms,” said Lee Lagomarcino, vice president of clothes care at GE Appliances. The $490 million infusion into Appliance Park is the latest round of investments in recent years as part of the company’s growth strategy. It builds on the company's previous investments of $3.5 billion in U.S. manufacturing in the past decade, with more than one-third of the amount going to Appliance Park.

Appliance Park in Louisville employs about 8,000 workers and is home to five plants that produce washers, dryers, dishwashers and refrigerators as well as parts and components. GE Appliances also has manufacturing plants in South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee and Connecticut.

GE Appliances is a subsidiary of the China-based Haier company. This is also something we should look into as they still have ties to CHINA and it could always be seen as a potential issue. So I'd go a step further I'd make them sell the company to AMERICAN investors before letting them do anymore bussiness in THE USA.

Monday, May 26, 2025

Trump calls Russian President Vladimir Putin crazy!


So in a turn that even the left media are having a hard time putting into words since it takes away their hoax that Trump and Putin are the best of friends The Kremlin responded Monday to President Trump’s criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin” Why? Well cause Trump called Putin "CRAZY!" And well we can all agree he's "crazy" there is no doubt there, and also a power driven KGB loving dictator. So our President isn't lying but the hilarious reply was that they're citing “emotional overload” at this “very important moment." This folks is hilarious!


But let's continue here "We are really grateful to the Americans and to President Trump personally for their assistance in organizing and launching this negotiation process,” said Russian spokesperson Dmitry Peskov when asked about Trump’s remarks, according to Reuters. “Of course, at the same time, this is a very crucial moment, which is associated, of course, with the emotional overload of everyone absolutely and with emotional reactions.” The comments come after Trump lashed out at Putin in recent days, a noticeable shift in tone that many have interpreted as a sign Trump is losing his patience with the Russian leader amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.

“I’ve always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!” Trump wrote Sunday night on Truth Social. At this point I think I should remind what happened last Trump term when these "CRAZY" dictator or terrorist decided to F' Around... They Found Out.

Exhibit A & B

Earlier that day, the president said he was “not happy” with his Russian counterpart as he prepared to board Air Force One. “I don’t know what the hell happened to Putin,” Trump told reporters. Russia overnight launched a record number of drones into Ukraine, along with nine cruise missiles, according to The Associated Press. No deaths were immediately confirmed. The attack followed a similar onslaught Saturday, when the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv came under fire from a barrage of Russian drones and missiles, killing at least 12 people. Trump has repeatedly vowed to end the conflict, the current phase of which began when Moscow invaded Ukraine in February 2022. 

The president’s comments are some of his toughest yet directed at Putin, though Trump has also ratcheted up his criticism of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. “Likewise, President Zelenskyy is doing his Country no favors by talking the way he does,” Trump said in his remarks Sunday before boarding Air Force One.



Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Democrat Rep. Shri Thanedar introduced seven articles of impeachments OF President Donald Trump

Now anyone who knows me knows I've been saying this for a long time that there is a major section in the country from India that is behind a lot of the lawlessness, and the overall attempt to take over this country. Even at a presidential level the person who lost to Donald Trump one Kamala Harris is from India background born to parents born in Jamaica but both again from INDIAN families, and both families of hers have once long back been "SLAVE OWNERS" ... These facts have been suppressed by the main stream over her time as VP due to the MSM doing their role in this coup of the country by these communists who are trying to destroy us from the inside.

IF You notice in the congress, and senate on almost every level now the liberal left is stacked with people who are not from this country or from Indian, Muslim or communists countries, and those who are not have bent knee to these people because yes folks they're making MILLIONS from selling out this country. We the people spoke loud when we elected Donald Trump last November back into office as this sort of inside JOB they were enacting under the Biden/Harris/Obama coup was finally being seen by so many people that the election was to big to rig. We won the Senate, House, and White House. Mid terms coming up soon and we must keep kicking these leftists out... One name we all need to include is Indian born Democrat Rep. Shri Thanedar who is another insane liberal and he just introduced seven articles of impeachment OF President Trump.

The Indian-born Democrat is accusing Trump of obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and other accusations. "Donald Trump has already done real damage to our democracy, but defying a unanimous Supreme Court ruling, That has to be the final straw." Now check out the video below folks, and no TRUMP didn't defy the court ruling he just did the right chess move, and beat the game so these people are upset. So watch this unhinged lunatic on video. Remember Trump got impeached 7 times during his first term and 2 went all the way past the first level so President Donald Trump was impeached twice during his single term in office. In each case, he was acquitted on all counts by the Senate.

Now we had someone from the left come forward and address this and well it looks like much like the party this is a DEAD ISSUE... The chair of the House Democratic Caucus on Tuesday rejected the efforts in the party to impeach President Trump. Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) did not go so far as to say that Trump has not committed impeachable offenses in his first 100 days back in office. But with Republicans controlling both the House and the Senate, Aguilar suggested the move is simply impractical. “Impeachment is, at times, a tool that can be used. This president is no stranger to that; he’s been impeached twice,” Aguilar told reporters in the Capitol. “But we don’t have any confidence that House and Senate Republicans would do their jobs. And so this is not an exercise that we’re willing to undertake.”

A day earlier, Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) filed seven articles of impeachment against Trump for actions he’s taken since January, including the wrongful deportation of a Maryland man to El Salvador and efforts to slash government spending without congressional approval. Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), another sharp Trump critic who looks like a caveman and someone who has never heard of things like a shower, has said he also plans to file impeachment articles at some point. The impeachment talk has ramped up amid liberal criticisms that Capitol Hill Democrats haven’t been aggressive enough in combating Trump in the early months of his second term. Democratic leaders, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), have rejected that characterization, pointing to a host of actions from field hearings and rallies, to sit-ins and town halls in GOP districts that Democrats have conducted to get their message out to voters.

“And we’re going to continue to show up, stand up and speak up in a variety of ways inside the Capitol, outside the Capitol, on the Capitol steps, in Democratic districts and Republican districts and throughout America,” Jeffries said Monday. Yet all these efforts to take down a President when people in actual need of help for disabilities, and other help that these people could spend their time working on they rather spend our tax payer money on this garbage. Then these liberals wonder why they have lost the voters? Why we voted in a RED WAVE in November? But Aguilar on Tuesday offered a similar message, saying Democrats will focus their energies on highlighting the unpopular elements of Trump’s policy agenda including Medicaid cuts and tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans rather than impeachment. Which is the right thing for them to do.

“Right now, we will deal with the tools in front of us,” Aguilar said. “The policies that he and House Republicans have placed forward which are reckless cuts to the health care system, to our supplemental nutrition that is relied on by women and children and families across this country those are the policies that we’re going to push back against. “And those are the items that the American public is paying attention to.” Let's hope that there is some sanity left in the decaying party known as the Democratic Party. But let's take a look back at how the past impeachments of Trump went.

The first impeachment trial stemmed from a call President Trump had with the President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine in which President Trump asked the Ukrainian President to announce two investigations: one involving his potential opponent in the upcoming 2020 presidential election and a second into unsubstantiated allegations that entities within Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 presidential election.1 At the time of the call, the Office of Management and Budget had frozen $400 million in military aid to Ukraine at the direction of the President.2 The contents of the call initially came to light through an intelligence community whistle blower report, but a summary of the call was later made public by President Trump. And proved that he never mentioned any of these things and simply asked "President Volodymyr Zelenskyy" to help end corruption in his country and to investigate what happened with "Cloudstrike" ... 

The House investigation proceeded in two phases. The fact-finding portion of the investigation was primarily handled by the House Intelligence Committee, in cooperation with the Committee on Oversight and Reform and the Committee on Foreign Affairs. The early stage of this phase of the investigation saw some controversy over whether the House must explicitly authorize the initiation of an impeachment investigation. Although the Speaker of the House had announced that the committee investigations constituted an official impeachment inquiry, the White House counsel objected to the investigations on the ground that the investigation lacked the necessary authorization for a valid impeachment proceeding and violated the Due Process Clause.

As a result, the President instructed members of his administration not to cooperate with the House’s unconstitutional inquiry. The House later took action to explicitly approve the impeachment investigation by adopting a resolution authorizing the House committees to continue their ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry into whether sufficient grounds exist . . . to impeach Donald John Trump. Nevertheless, the White House and other Executive Branch offices generally refused to comply with the House investigators requests for information, including subpoenas. Some Executive Branch officials, however, made the individual determination to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry and, as a result, the Intelligence Committee was able to hold a number of investigative hearings and issue a report outlining their findings. The record established in the fact finding phase was then provided to the Judiciary Committee.

Phase two of the impeachment investigation was conducted by the Judiciary Committee. This phase focused on whether the President’s conduct, as uncovered in the fact finding phase of the inquiry, constituted an impeachable offense. Following a series of hearings, the Committee recommended two articles of impeachment against the President, both of which were ultimately approved by the House. The first charged the President with abuse of power, alleging that he had used the powers of his office to solicit Ukraine’s interference in the 2020 election and had conditioned official acts, such as the release of military aid to Ukraine and a White House visit, on President Zelenskyy agreeing to announce the investigations. President Trump, the article alleged, engaged in this scheme or course of conduct for corrupt purposes in pursuit of personal political benefit. The second article charged the President with obstruction of the House impeachment investigation by directing the unprecedented, categorical, and indiscriminate defiance of subpoenas issued by the House of Representatives.

This abuse of office, the article alleged, was subversive of constitutional government and nullif[ied] a vital constitutional safeguard vested solely in the House of Representatives. Although the impeachment articles were adopted by the House on December 18, 2019, the managers were not appointed and the articles not delivered to the Senate until January 15, 2020. The Senate trial was characterized by deep partisan divides and complicated disagreements over questions of law and fact, including presidential motive. But one clear constitutional conflict that arose during the trial involved the proper relationship between impeachment and criminal law. Trial briefs and debate made clear that the House managers and President Trump’s attorneys reached very different conclusions on the question of whether high crimes and misdemeanors require evidence of a criminal act or other legal violation.14 The House, consistent with past impeachment practice, asserted that for purposes of Article II high Crimes and Misdemeanors need not be indictable criminal offenses. 

In response, however, the President’s attorneys asserted that an impeachable offense must be a violation of established law, and that the articles fail[ed] to allege any crime or violation of law whatsoever, let alone ‘high Crimes and Misdemeanors,’ as required by the Constitution. The acquittal provided no clear resolution to these conflicting positions, but the debate over a link between illegal acts and impeachable acts appears to have had some impact on individual Senators. Indeed, the House’s managers’ failure to allege an explicit criminal act appears, along with criticism of the House investigation and failure of the House to prove its case, to have been among the primary reasons given for acquittal.

As the Senate trial proceeded, it became apparent that a major point of contention would be whether the Senate would call its own witnesses. The House managers asked that the Senate authorize subpoenas for relevant Executive Branch documents and for testimony from various White House officials including former National Security Advisor John Bolton.18 With only forty-nine Senators voting in favor, the Senate chose not to approve that request, and the record was limited to the evidence provided by the House. Ultimately, the Senate acquitted President Trump on both counts. Article I failed by a vote of 48-52 while Article II failed by a vote of 47-53.

The second Trump impeachment occurred a year later in the waning days of the Trump presidency following the events on January 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol in which some supporters of President Trump attempted to disrupt the congressional certification of the 2020 presidential election as having been won by Joseph Biden. The House moved quickly following those events. Passing on an investigation, the Judiciary Committee staff compiled publicly available evidence relating to the President’s actions on January 6 and within one week had introduced and approved a single article of impeachment charging the President with incitement to insurrection. Specifically, the article alleged that in the months running up to January 6th the President had consistently issued false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people. He then repeated those claims when addressing a crowd on January 6, and willfully made statements that, in context, encouraged and foreseeable resulted in lawless action at the Capitol. . . . Notably, although the House ultimately impeached President Trump prior to the expiration of his term, the Senate did not commence a trial until after President Trump had left office. 

The Senate trial saw the chamber make two important threshold determinations regarding trials of former Presidents. First, although the Constitution clearly requires the Chief Justice to preside over presidential impeachment trials, the Senate implicitly determined that that requirement does not extend to the trial of a former President. At the opening of the trial, Senator Patrick Leahy, President pro tempore of the United States Senate, was sworn in as presiding officer without objection.

The Senate also made the threshold determination of whether it had the constitutional authority to try a former President. After briefing and debate on the question of whether the Senate had jurisdiction over a former President for acts that occurred during his tenure in office, the Senate explicitly determined by a vote of 56-44 that it did. Thus a majority of Senators, as they have on previous occasions, determined that former officials may be tried by the Senate and, though not removable, remain subject to disqualification from holding future office if convicted. With respect to whether the President had committed an impeachable offense, the main substantive question during the trial arguably revolved around the proper application of the First Amendment. 

The former President’s attorneys invoked the First Amendment as a defense to the impeachment charge, asserting that free speech protections apply and limit the conduct that can be considered an impeachable offense. The President’s political statements at the rally, his attorneys argued, constituted core free speech under the First Amendment and thus not an impeachable offense. 

The House managers disagreed, arguing that The First Amendment has no application in an impeachment proceeding because impeachment does not seek to punish unlawful speech, but instead to protect the Nation from a President who violated his oath of office and abused the public trust. Moreover, even if the First Amendment did restrict the impeachment power, it still would not protect President Trump’s calls to violence, which the managers asserted fell within the well-established category of unprotected speech directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action.

In the end, the First Amendment arguments made by the former President’s attorneys do not appear to have had an impact on Senators, as only one Senator who voted to acquit the former President mentioned the First Amendment in the formal explanation of his vote. Although a majority of Senators voted to convict, former President Trump was ultimately acquitted by a vote of 57-43.

Friday, April 18, 2025

Sen. Van Hollen in El Salvador with MS-13 gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia ‘sipping margaritas’ on TAXPAYER MONEY!

So the MS-13 Gang-banger Kilmar Abrego Garcia was caught on footage hanging out “sipping margaritas” with now disgraced Sen. Chris Van Hollen Thursday amid his high-profile deportation battle for this known scumbag and soon as Van Hollen landed news had broken that Kilmar was also a WIFE BEATING Illegal Criminal Gang-banger. So according to photos shared by El Salvador President Nayib Bukele we have here how the Democrats feel. They will travel to meet with a ILLEGAL, Criminal, GANG BANGER, Wife Beater but will not mention how MS-13 kill people, and are involved in human & drug trafficking.

Bukele shared three pics of the Democratic Maryland lawmaker meeting with Abrego Garcia who was deported to El Salvador’s notorious mega prison last month lounging in the country’s “tropical paradise” with what appeared to be salt-rimmed drinking glasses containing an unknown liquid and a cherry. 
“Kilmar Abrego Garcia, miraculously risen from the ‘death camps’ & ‘torture’, now sipping margaritas with Sen. Van Hollen in the tropical paradise of El Salvador,” Bukele said in an X post Thursday night.

“Now that he’s been confirmed healthy, he gets the honor of staying in El Salvador’s custody,” Bukele, who said earlier this week that he 
has no intention of returning Abrego Garcia to the US, wrote in a separate postVan Hollen (D-MD) again as we know traveled to the Central American nation this to push for the release of the illegal migrant and purported MS-13 member. Moron thinks because he a nobody goes there it will mean anything and suddenly they will bring this illegal back.

The excursion sparked outrage from the mother of murdered Maryland woman Rachel Morin, 37, who was ruthlessly killed by Victor Martinez-Hernandez, a different Salvadoran illegal immigrant who was convicted Monday of the 2023 murder. 

“I just don’t understand this,” Patty Morin told the White House press corps Wednesday, while slamming the senator who she says “didn’t even acknowledge” her daughter’s brutal slaying. 
She said Van Hollen instead chose to “use my tax money to fly to El Salvador to bring back a person … who isn’t even an American citizen.” 

The White House also took aim at the Democrat for prioritizing “the welfare” of a “terrorist” after the photos of him and Abrego Garcia were shared online Thursday night.

“Chris Van Hollen has firmly established Democrats as the party whose top priority is the welfare of an illegal alien MS-13 terrorist,” the White House said in a statement to The Post.“

It is truly disgusting. President Trump will continue to stand on the side of law-abiding Americans.” Van Hollen also took to social media to share a photo of him meeting with Abrego Garcia, who was wearing a colorful checkered collard shirt, jeans, sneakers and a Kansas City Super Bowl hat .

“I said my main goal of this trip was to meet with Kilmar,” Van Hollen posted to X, with a picture of the pair sitting outside at a table with what appears to be glasses of water and coffee. “Tonight I had that chance. I have called his wife, Jennifer, to pass along his message of love. I look forward to providing a full update upon my return.” We ask can El Salvador keep 'Van Hollen' ? I mean it would do us a big time favor if you throw his treason committing ass in prison!The Salvadoran migrant was living in Maryland with his wife and children when he was shipped off with 260 other reputed gang members to El Salvador’s hellhole lockup CECOT last month under the 18th-century Alien Enemies Act "despite never being charged with a crime in America" which is a joke but this is what the left says right? But wait he's here illegally! So this is a "CRIME!" DUH!

The Trump administration claimed that Abrego Garcia is part of the vicious MS-13 gang and was living in the country illegally when he was deported. The administration has since repeatedly defied several court orders, including one from the US Supreme Court, to return him back to the land of the free, and disavowed Abrego Garcia as being “wrongly deported” despite admitting he was booted from the country as a result of a “clerical error.” But oh well bringing him back in won't happen no matter how much they cry about it since he was still after all here ILLEGALLY.His deportation also went against a 2019 order blocking the feds’ ability to remove him to El Salvador on the grounds that he was at risk of retaliation from gangs. Why? Cause he did something with HIS GANG against other GANGS and so he had to flee and came here illegally breaking the law to lay low for whatever "crime" he did there against another gang banger. Probably killed someone, and or was drug money related. Either way this is not someone I'd want in our country.

Bukele said Monday at the White House that he has no intention of returning Abrego Garcia calling the idea “preposterous.” Amid the public battle over his case, US Attorney General Pam Bondi released documents Wednesday showing Abrego Garcia was an active MS-13 member in 2019 and held the rank of “Chequeo” and the street name “Chele” within the violent international gang. The Department of Homeland Security also revealed that he was accused of physically abusing his wife, who applied for a protective order, in 2021. 

His wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, who has fought for her husband’s release, told The Post she asked for protection from Abrego Garcia “out of caution” after she survived domestic abuse in a “previous relationship.” And hey here is an idea? MOVE TO El Salvador! 

LOL And go live with your man!

The alleged gang member’s wife argued that her husband’s alleged abuse “is not justification for ICE’s actions of abducting him and deporting him to a country where he was supposed to be protected from deportation.” And once again I tell her to "F-OFF" as he was here breaking the law running away from beef with other gang banger's. 

He is not ABOVE THE LAW.

Monday, March 3, 2025

Disgraced James E. Dennehy ousted from FBI


The shake up at the FBI continue and after the Epstein file showdown this week it was clear to me that this was handled how it was to oust those keeping the information and not working with PAM & KASH and sure enough now we have the first name to drop, and he's the now ex an top agent at the F.B.I. folks. Now the New York field office said in an email Monday that he had been forced out of his job, and so he's done, toast, another swamp creature outed! 

His departure follows clashes with Justice Department officials over Trump administration directives. The veteran agent, James E. Dennehy, was told Friday to retire from his role leading the F.B.I.’s largest field office, delivering another blow to the senior ranks of the bureau. Mr. Dennehy, who had been running the office since September, had angered Trump administration officials by supporting bureau leaders who resisted turning over the names of those who investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.



Mr. Dennehy had also angered Attorney General Pam Bondi by what she claimed was the New York office’s failure to turn over all the investigative files related to Jeffrey Epstein, the financier charged with sex trafficking who killed himself in prison. Ms. Bondi provided no evidence to back up her assertion. “Late Friday, I was informed that I needed to put my retirement papers in today, which I just did,” Mr. Dennehy wrote Monday in an email to colleagues. “I was not given a reason for this decision. Regardless, I apologize to all of you for not being able to fulfill my commitment to you.” 

Mr. Dennehy’s departure comes after weeks of turmoil at the F.B.I. that saw nearly a dozen executives at headquarters removed unexpectedly, leaving a leadership vacuum and confusion on the seventh floor of the Hoover Building in Washington, D.C.

Mr. Dennehy, who served for seven years as a U.S. Marine officer before joining the bureau in 2002, spent most of his career investigating or supervising counterintelligence cases, which, in essence, involved chasing spies rather than building criminal cases. But FOX Mulder he's not and folks he's one of the bad guys who has been in there doing the work of the wrong people. Before being named to head the agency’s flagship office in New York, he headed its office in Newark for two years. 

But he spent the bulk of his career in New York and at headquarters in Washington, including leading New York’s counterintelligence and cyber division. On Friday, Ms. Bondi said that Mr. Dennehy’s office had deliberately held back information sought by Justice Department headquarters. She wrote in a letter Thursday to the bureau’s new director, Kash Patel, that she had been “repeatedly assured by the F.B.I.” that she had been given a full set of documents related to the investigation and indictment of Mr. Epstein.

Her letter, however, suggested the F.B.I. office in New York had turned over only a small fraction of that paperwork. “When you and I spoke yesterday, you were just as surprised as I was to learn this new information,” her letter to Mr. Patel said. The letter imposed a Feb. 28 deadline for the F.B.I. to “deliver the full and complete Epstein files to my office.” She also ordered “an immediate investigation into why my order to the F.B.I. was not followed.” 

In January, the acting leaders of the F.B.I., Brian Driscoll and Robert Kissane, refused to provide a list of personnel involved in the Jan. 6 cases. Emil Bove, the acting No. 2 in the Justice Department, accused the men of being insubordinate. Ultimately, the F.B.I. turned over the information. In a defiant and eloquent email, Mr. Dennehy came to their defense and urged his staff to “dig in” after the Trump administration targeted officials involved in the investigations into the Jan. 6 attack. He also praised the bureau’s interim leaders for defending its independence.

On Monday, he wrote that among the top qualities he would miss about the bureau was its independence. “We will not bend. We will not falter. We will not sacrifice what is right for anything or anyone,” he wrote.

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Ilhan Omar to be deported?



They need to stop messing around with this evil clown Ilhan Omar. She needs to be sent packing back to Somalia and never allowed back into this country as she is clearly an enemy of this country. How she's being voted into office is beyond me as she's not doing a good job in any capacity and has shown flashes of being pure evil and corrupt. Now with Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) circulating a petition for his supporters to sign to deport Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) needs to happen. Gil had previously called on Omar to be deported, arguing she is more loyal to undocumented immigrants in the United States from her native Somalia than to the United States. The petition and an email circulated by Gill were first reported by Axios. 

Omar became a U.S. citizen in 2000 after fleeing her native country due to civil war. The Minnesota representative has been the target of Republican insults following her staunch criticism of President Trump during his first administration. “Friend, we should have never let Ilhan Omar into our country. And frankly, America would be a much better place if she were to be sent back to Somalia,” Gill wrote in the email which included a picture of him next to President Trump. As in the past, he criticized Omar for discussing how to evade Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. “Recently, it came out that Ilhan Omar is hosting free workshops for Somalians, who are in our country illegally, on how to evade ICE and deportation. It could not be more blatant: Ilhan Omar is more loyal to illegal Somalians than she is to the United States, or the office she was elected to,” he added. Several Democrats criticized the most recent remarks by Gil, a freshman member of the new Congress. 

“⁦@SpeakerJohnson⁩, get control of your caucus before we have to take other actions. This is demeaning & embarrassing,” Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wisc.) said in a post on X. “We all need to be better than this shit. I expect an answer today.”

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) also raised concerns with the GOP member’s comments. “It’s disgusting that Republicans are attempting to raise money by threatening to deport a US citizen just because they disagree with her,” she wrote on X. “Ilhan Omar is a tireless advocate for her district, a fierce protector of our democracy, and I know these fascist threats won’t keep her down.”

But this corruption is not just her as we seen AOC the Village IDIOT in NY might end up in prison for doing webinars on helping illegals avoid ICE, and openly says to not follow the law of the land ON VIDEO. Hence why she really is The Village Idiot. Check out the video below... This is hilarious and scary.      

Saturday, February 1, 2025

YouTard James Charles Mocks RFK Jr


There is human garbage and than there are people like this lowlife dirt bag pedophile swamp demon YouTuber James Charles has admitted in the past of sending sexually explicit messages to two 16-year-old boys. Yes he's a complete and uttler pedophile dogshit moron and he tried to defend his actions by saying "I fully understand my actions and how they are wrong," the 21-year-old influencer said in a video posted to his YouTube channel. Those allegations against Charles first emerged on social media earlier in February 2021, the influencer who has 25 million subscribers to his YouTube channel was accused by one teenager of grooming, which Charles denied, saying he flirted with the person because he believed the boy to be 18.

Charles had denied previous accusations, but in video, titled "Holding myself accountable", he admitted wrongdoing. He says there were two incidents one last year and one more recently where he came to be aware that the person he was exchanging messages with was underage. "These conversations should have never happened," Charles said in the 14-minute video. He admitted he could have searched for them on other social media platforms and found their real ages. He also publicly apologised to the boys and said he would take time away from posting on social media to "educate" himself about these issues.

The scandal is not the first time the influencer had faced controversy as back as 2019, he was accused of using "fame and money to try to manipulate someone's sexuality", which he also denied which is a pattern for this one. When addressing why he has been "reckless" in past relationships, he said it's because he's "desperate"... Which to the rest of us means "LOSER" but in a video he made addressing the 2019 accusation, Charles made a promise to be more careful moving forward. Yeah I don't trust him because remember these are only the stuff we find out he done. But I wonder how many times has he done this and never been reported or him called out on it. But with this sort of stuff you would think this fruitcake would tone it down and not want to well make a testicle out of himself but no he's at it again as he's rescently went at RFK Jr for the way he speaks and mocked the man in a video call or some instagram post. Check this moron out and what he said about RFK Jr.


What is sad about this to me is that these leftist and liberals like this dork claim to be the party of unity and love and happiness and yes you see nothing but bitter un happy dildo loving morons like James Charles here. This guy deserves 2 good bitch slaps! First for being who and what he is, and Second for saying this dumb shit on video and actually posting it. 

We could use less morons like this one breathing our air, and consuming our water, and other resources. May the forces that control the universe send James Charles all the bad Karma he deserves for mocking a great man like RFK Jr.

Monday, January 27, 2025

TRUMP MAKING THEM BOW DOWN!


President Donald Trump on Sunday announced retaliatory tariffs on Colombia after its president said he blocked US military deportation flights, the first instance of Trump using economic pressure to force other nations to fall in line with his mass deportation plans since he took office last week.

This is when someone Fucked Around and FOUND OUT! See his whole stance lasted 39 minutes after Trumps announcement for ol’ Gustavo to back down and offer his plane as assistance. So in a late-night news conference, Colombian Foreign Minister Luis Gilberto Murillo said officials had “overcome the impasse” and would accept citizens deported from the US. A White House statement said Colombia had agreed to all of Trump’s terms, including “unrestricted acceptance of all illegal aliens from Colombia returned from the United States, including on US military aircraft, without limitation or delay”. “Today’s events make clear to the world that America is respected again,” the White House said.

Washington and Bogota had been poised for a damaging trade war after Trump announced he would hit Colombian imports with a 25 percent “emergency” tariff, rising to a 50 percent tariff from next week, in response to Petro’s refusal to accept the deportation flights.

Trump also said he would impose a “travel ban and immediate visa revocations” and “visa sanctions” on government officials, as well as their family members and supporters, and enhance border inspections of all Colombian nationals and cargo. “These measures are just the beginning. We will not allow the Colombian Government to violate its legal obligations with regard to the acceptance and return of the Criminals they forced into the United States!” Trump said on his social media network Truth Social. Trump later posted an image appearing to show himself wearing a pinstripe suit and a fedora while standing in front of a sign reading “FAFO”, an acronym for “f*** around and find out”. Petro swiftly responded to Trump’s announcement by promising to impose retaliatory tariffs of up to 50 percent.

In a lengthy diatribe on X, Petro, a former member of the leftist M-19 armed rebel movement, said he did not like travelling to the US as it is “a bit boring”, though he acknowledged his appreciation for Walt Whitman, Paul Simon and Noam Chomsky. “My land is made up of goldsmiths who worked in the time of the Egyptian pharaohs and of the first artists in the world in Chiribiquete,” Petro said. “You will never rule us. The warrior who rode our lands, shouting freedom, who is called Bolivar, opposes us.” Petro had said earlier he had refused the deportation flights to send a message that the US “cannot treat Colombian migrants as criminals”.

“I cannot allow migrants to remain in a country that does not want them; but if that country sends them back, it must be with dignity and respect for them and for our country,” he said in a post on X, which included news footage showing deportees in Brazil at an airport with their hands and feet restrained. Oliver Della Costa Stuenkel, an international relations professor at Fundacao Getulio Vargas in Sao Paulo, Brazil, said while Trump may get his way with Latin American countries in the short term, his aggressive tactics could push leaders in the region to seek out alternative partners to Washington. “Leaders across Latin America will look at these moments and will, I think, be increasingly aware of the risk of being too dependent on the US,” Stuenkel told Al Jazeera.

“They will seek to diversify their partnerships because for weaker countries, dealing with Washington is very challenging and the best way to increase your leverage when negotiating with Trump and expand your room for manoeuvre is to have alternatives to the US. It’s to not be in situation where you are so dependent that you have nowhere to run.” Stuenkel said that Latin American leaders will have taken note of the vulnerability of Mexico and Canada, which Trump has threatened to hit with a 25 percent tariff over what he claims is their failure to stop the flow of drugs and undocumented migrants. “So everybody looks at Mexico and Canada and says I want to avoid being Mexico and Canada because they can’t really do anything when they are pressured by Trump,” he said.

“So I think in the medium- and long-term, countries will be very keen to strengthen ties to other powers around the world. I think that includes Europe, but mostly China… It also includes Russia. And I don’t think that should be seen as an anti-American move. I think even pro-American leaders will actually do that.” Earlier on Sunday, Trump’s “border czar” expressed confidence that countries reluctant to take back their citizens would relent under US pressure. “El Salvador didn’t want to take MS-13 members back. 

Took President Trump 48 hours to make that happen,” Tom Homan told ABC News. “President Trump’s going to put America first, and if it doesn’t, then we’ll place ‘em in a third safe country.” Trump’s actions drew condemnation from several Democratic legislators, with New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez warning that the tariffs would lead to higher prices for US consumers.

“Trump is all about making inflation WORSE for working class Americans, not better. He’s lining the pockets of himself and the billionaire class,” Ocasio-Cortez said in a post on X. In Colombia, Petro’s handling of the spat also drew fire from critics. Ivan Duque, who served as Colombia’s president from 2018 to 2022 under the banner of the right-leaning Democratic Centre party, said his rival had committed an act of “tremendous irresponsibility” by challenging US sovereignty without attempting dialogue. 

“It is urgent that the Petro government put the country above its populist prejudices and anti-US rhetoric and quickly establish protocols for receiving deported Colombians, and avoid a situation that could structurally affect our economy and our citizens,” Duque said in a post on X. Colombia, which counts the US as its biggest trade partner, is one of a minority of nations with a trade deficit with the US.

US exports to Colombia in 2022 were worth $28.7bn, compared with imports of $24.8bn, according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative. Top US imports from Colombia include crude oil, coffee, cut flowers and gold, while Colombia imports large amounts of US gasoline, corn and soybeans. Trump’s immigration crackdown has elevated tensions with governments across Latin America, the source of the lion’s share of the estimated 11-14 million undocumented migrants in the US. Brazil on Saturday accused the Trump administration of subjecting migrants to “degrading treatment” after deportees were reportedly handcuffed during a commercial flight to return unauthorized migrants to the Latin American country. As part of a burst of activity to follow through on Trump’s campaign pledge to crack down on undocumented migration, his administration has begun using military aircraft to support deportation flights arranged by the US Department of Homeland Security.

On Friday, two Air Force C-17 cargo planes carrying about 160 deportees touched down in Guatemala, making it one of the first countries known to accept the flights. NBC News on Friday reported that Mexico had denied permission to a military plane carrying deportees. The report, which quoted three unnamed sources, said it was unclear why Mexico had refused the flight. Following the publication of the report, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a post on X that Mexico had accepted “a record” of four deportation flights in a single day.

But THIS isn't the only issue with these communists and even in our own soil such idiotic filth is in positions of power. We call then liberals... This one is funny as Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs says she will NOT allow Tom Homan to conduct mass deportations in Arizona.



She wants to Fuck Around and Find OUT?

Well this from new Border Czar Tom Homan who replied saying he will arrest Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs if she interferes in mass deportation of illegal aliens. 

We will see if she makes any moves cause Tom is coming and he's not playing around and she's not very into the law as it looks because she's off on how much Tom can do and yes he can have her arrested. 

Check out the list here that details the power of what Tom Homan and Trump can do if you want to fuck around with them and ICE removing illegals. These radicals forget when you enter here illegally you're automatically breaking the law. 

Stop protecting these people for god sake you're just making it harder for our Citizens as they can't get work because Illegals do it cheaper. 

This is an issue in all sorts of jobs in the entire country.

Saturday, January 18, 2025

CNN to Exile Jim Acosta to "Siberia of television news"


So it's being labeled as "CNN" wanting to exile Jim Acosta’s show to the ‘Siberia of television news’ to stop him annoying Trump? Apparently plotting to exile anchor Jim Acosta longtime antagonist of President-elect Donald Trump to the “Siberia of television news” in a bid to “throw a bone” to the incoming commander-in-chief, according to reports. The network’s boss, Mark Thompson, this week called in Acosta to propose shifting his show, “CNN Newsroom with Jim Acosta,” from 10 a.m. to the graveyard midnight slot, ex-CNN senior media reporter Oliver Darcy reported in his Status News newsletter.

“The move would effectively exile Acosta to the Siberia of television news,” Darcy wrote. Acosta was caught “off guard,” Darcy said with the anchor later using his airtime for some self-promotion to send a message to Trump to go easier on journalists. Well Jim how about this time around you stop lying, and gas lighting b/s rumors created by the liberals? How about actually reporting some non biased news there? “He had no reason to believe that his current show would be on the chopping block. In fact, his ratings have been some of the network’s strongest,” Darcy pointed out.

The move was to accommodate moving veteran anchor Wolf Blitzer from prime time evenings to a morning show when asked by Acosta was told to move to midnight but the claim was it had nothing to do with his 'ratings or editorial style', Darcy said. However, most sources pinned the move on preparations for Trump’s return to office given Acosta’s infamously testy relationship with the previous time Trump was in office who famously branded the anchor “a rude, terrible person.” Knowing his work, and family for many decades folks I can tell you that Jim is, and has always been a very "Rude, A-Hole" but this is just from personal info but as the story goes here it was also claimed “They want to get rid of Acosta to throw a bone to Trump,” an unnamed media executive told the newsletter.


“Midnight is not a serious offer when his ratings are among the best on the network.” Acosta was a CNN White House correspondent during the first Trump administration and had numerous confrontations, leading to him losing his press pass after one petty exchange with the then-president at a 2018 press conference. “CNN should be ashamed of itself having you working for them,” Trump told Acosta at the time. It wasn’t immediately clear if Acosta was considering the midnight show offer. A CNN Spokesperson declined to comment on the reports.

The news emerged, though, as Acosta used his Thursday show to throw shade at Trump and crow about the importance of the media just days out from the inauguration. Like the usual little communist he is. Jim isn't going to stop and CNN if you want to save face it's time you remove these toxic liars, and con artist from your network. 

Starting with Jim is a good start.

Saturday, November 9, 2024

FEMINEM - Loza Alexander OMG!


OOPS! He did it again... lol So I just saw this poppin off on YouTube and had to bring it here and drop it off as news because I've also made songs about Eminem and it's good to see people like Loza Alexander here take this and running with it since he's got more awareness than myself. The song he just released on social media is called "FEMINEM" and if you know who Loza is he's the rapper who putout the song "Let's Go Brandon" and who has been very vocal in the hip hop world as a Trump conservative supporter.



As the win of Trump and running up to it Loza has put out great music showing both his skills as an MC! But also how Rappers can be positive in showing people what classic conservative values added with the hip hop culture can be a positive as contrast to the constant hate coming from the likes of rappers EMINEM represents.


 Here is a full playlist together of his music.. Enjoy!

Saturday, May 25, 2024

Biden Accused Of Racism For Comments At Event With Kenyan President



Puppet leader of the radical loons in DC Joe Biden has been accused of racism again after a comment he made at a get together with gathering with Kenyan President William Ruto and First Lady Rachel Ruto. This is what he said and it's also on video. “Jill and I are honored to have you here, and we’re representing and including many members of the African diaspora. One just left, Barack…” he said. The response on X, formerly Twitter, was fierce. “Wow! Even for Biden, that was a new level of racism,” one Twitter user said. “He’s not well,” Donald Trump Jr. said. “Joe Biden is an embarrassment to our country,” the Republican Party said. The Heritage Foundation said in 2021 that the president has a history of racist commentary. “Joe Biden has a decades-long habit of making overtly racist remarks, taking discriminatory positions and cavorting with known racists—things that would get anyone to his political right tossed out of polite society. But being on the left must make it okay,” it said.

“In 2007, he referred to Barack Obama as “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean.” In 2006, he said, “You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent.” Way back in 1977, he said that forced busing to desegregate schools would cause his children to “grow up in a racial jungle,” The Heritage Foundation said. “Put these words into Mitch McConnell’s mouth and try to envision how long he’d be allowed to remain in the Senate, let alone in a leadership position. It does not take much effort to imagine the media’s reaction if Donald Trump had mangled so many racial issues in one press conference,” it said. His comments came as he is struggling with black voters and former President Donald Trump is gaining them. While President Biden and his administration continue to try and convince Americans that their lives are better under his economic policies collectively known as “Bidenomics,” the reality for a growing majority is that no, life was much better under former President Donald Trump.

In fact, a damning new statistic is likely to further endanger Biden’s reelection chances as many are starting to wake up from the spell that they have had for decades on them by the Democraps. “Many people of all races, and especially younger voters, are dismissing President Joe Biden’s claim that ‘they have the money to spend,’ with some revealing that they went without food one day last month,” the Washington Examiner reported, citing a poll. “In an unusual survey that tapped into the hurt many feel from inflation, minorities, young voters, and those with just a high school education suffered from food “insecurity,” Zogby Analytics said,” the outlet reported. At least 14 percent of respondents said they went at least a day without food in April.

Blacks who make a reliably Democratic voting bloc that has increasingly shifted to Trump over the course of the Biden term is attempting to hold together have been especially hard-hit by his Bidenomics, which has produced record-high and sustained high food costs + many goods which have doubled and sometimes tripled in cost here in America. As Black American voters who were aged 18-24 (34%) were almost five times as likely as voters aged 55-69 (7%) to experience food insecurity in the last month. Numbers also increased among rural African Americans (31%, compared to 21% of urban and 16% of suburban African Americans, respectively), and African Americans without a college education (23%) were twice as likely to experience food insecurity than those with a college education (10%),” the analysis said.

Hispanics or Latinos are another demographic struggling under Biden. “Among Hispanic voters, numbers were similar, especially among certain sub-groups. One in five (19%) of surveyed Hispanics experienced food insecurity. Younger Hispanics aged 18-24 (30%) were three times as likely to experience food insecurity than Hispanics aged 55-69 (11%). Also like African Americans surveyed, rural (29%) Hispanics were more likely to experience food insecurity, compared to urban (20%) and suburban (14%) Hispanics. Non-college educated (22%) Hispanics were twice as likely to have gone without food for more than twenty-four hours in the last month compared to college educated (10%) Hispanics,” the analysis said.

Personally myself Angel Espino I being a Latino or Hispanic however you want to call me and I'm not just hurting for everyday supplies I'm unable to work and I struggle just to keep myself from being homeless under the Bidenomics... I have 3 major disabilities a broken back, 3 tumors and thyroid cancer, and because of changes in the system of disability since BIDEN took office and changed somethings Trump fixed from Obamacare I'm being denied help and will die from it unless I get the help that this admisinistration has failed me on. These people rather help illegals to keep power than help it's own citizens like myself not die from illnesses. This is the legacy of the Joe Biden term. "Kill off your citizens and flood the country with illegals to rig elections, and go after your political rivals like Donald Trump and put them in prison!" - Angel Espino

Also you notice how this entire race by BIDEN has been about "RACE" and not how to fix our country? All these people on the left hold on too is racist lies about Trump and the conservatives without giving us the people ways they will fix the issues they mostly have caused while Trump has been doing just that on a constant basis while getting side tracked with made up charges in bogus cases again brought by some of the most idiotic racist people like "Tish James, Fanni Willis, Alvin Bragg, AOC" but these progressive radical leftists who are all Marxist, and don't care about the people but only the power, and money.

The Bronx which is made up of mostly Latinos and Blacks just showed the rest of the country that NY is in play in favor of Trump in 2024 because they're all able to see past the Biden b/s.



Saturday, November 18, 2023

Thursday, November 9, 2023

Tucker Carlson Tonight 11/9/23


This is pure complete insanity, and proof that we don't live in a free country anymore..... We're in a real Police State.
This is unbelievable when someonen had been arrested for posting a JOKE about Hillary Clinton in 2016, around time for the presidential election. Mind you he didn't get arrested until after JOE BIDEN became President. The FBI, and cops showed up at arrested this man for simple re-posting a meme and mocking Hillary. Folks you won't believe this! 

Ep. 38 The First Amendment is done. Douglass Mackey is about to go to prison for mocking Hillary Clinton on the internet. We talked to him right before his sentencing. Remember as you watch that this could be you.



Someone, PLEASE, tell me we are free.... Do we really live in a Communist country? Or are we free? You decide.


The nastiest woman to live on this planet someone who might have gotten away with how many people getting murdered, how many HUMAN including CHILD TRAFFICKING, CHEATING, AND... YOU NAME IT...... But an innocent person goes to jail and experience a destroyed life, for doing NOTHING WRONG, except laughing at Hillary Clinton!

Saturday, August 26, 2023

New York Post Poll – President Trump Surges to 61% National Support


President Trump now commands 61% of the vote amid Republicans, with no other candidate reaching double digits.  Ron DeSantis has collapsed to 9% after losing two-thirds of his previous support.

Rupert Murdoch owns the New York Post who commissioned the statistically valid poll of
1,800 voters. [DATA HERE]


Within the results, President Trump now commands 61% of the vote amid Republicans, with no other candidate reaching double digits.  Ron DeSantis has collapsed to 9% after losing two-thirds of his previous support. Chris Christie and Asa Hutchinson no longer register any support.  


Vivek Ramaswamy polls with 5%, the same as Mike Pence. The poll was conducted after the Republican primary debate.