Showing posts with label impeachment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label impeachment. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Democrat Rep. Shri Thanedar introduced seven articles of impeachments OF President Donald Trump

Now anyone who knows me knows I've been saying this for a long time that there is a major section in the country from India that is behind a lot of the lawlessness, and the overall attempt to take over this country. Even at a presidential level the person who lost to Donald Trump one Kamala Harris is from India background born to parents born in Jamaica but both again from INDIAN families, and both families of hers have once long back been "SLAVE OWNERS" ... These facts have been suppressed by the main stream over her time as VP due to the MSM doing their role in this coup of the country by these communists who are trying to destroy us from the inside.

IF You notice in the congress, and senate on almost every level now the liberal left is stacked with people who are not from this country or from Indian, Muslim or communists countries, and those who are not have bent knee to these people because yes folks they're making MILLIONS from selling out this country. We the people spoke loud when we elected Donald Trump last November back into office as this sort of inside JOB they were enacting under the Biden/Harris/Obama coup was finally being seen by so many people that the election was to big to rig. We won the Senate, House, and White House. Mid terms coming up soon and we must keep kicking these leftists out... One name we all need to include is Indian born Democrat Rep. Shri Thanedar who is another insane liberal and he just introduced seven articles of impeachment OF President Trump.

The Indian-born Democrat is accusing Trump of obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and other accusations. "Donald Trump has already done real damage to our democracy, but defying a unanimous Supreme Court ruling, That has to be the final straw." Now check out the video below folks, and no TRUMP didn't defy the court ruling he just did the right chess move, and beat the game so these people are upset. So watch this unhinged lunatic on video. Remember Trump got impeached 7 times during his first term and 2 went all the way past the first level so President Donald Trump was impeached twice during his single term in office. In each case, he was acquitted on all counts by the Senate.

Now we had someone from the left come forward and address this and well it looks like much like the party this is a DEAD ISSUE... The chair of the House Democratic Caucus on Tuesday rejected the efforts in the party to impeach President Trump. Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) did not go so far as to say that Trump has not committed impeachable offenses in his first 100 days back in office. But with Republicans controlling both the House and the Senate, Aguilar suggested the move is simply impractical. “Impeachment is, at times, a tool that can be used. This president is no stranger to that; he’s been impeached twice,” Aguilar told reporters in the Capitol. “But we don’t have any confidence that House and Senate Republicans would do their jobs. And so this is not an exercise that we’re willing to undertake.”

A day earlier, Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) filed seven articles of impeachment against Trump for actions he’s taken since January, including the wrongful deportation of a Maryland man to El Salvador and efforts to slash government spending without congressional approval. Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), another sharp Trump critic who looks like a caveman and someone who has never heard of things like a shower, has said he also plans to file impeachment articles at some point. The impeachment talk has ramped up amid liberal criticisms that Capitol Hill Democrats haven’t been aggressive enough in combating Trump in the early months of his second term. Democratic leaders, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), have rejected that characterization, pointing to a host of actions from field hearings and rallies, to sit-ins and town halls in GOP districts that Democrats have conducted to get their message out to voters.

“And we’re going to continue to show up, stand up and speak up in a variety of ways inside the Capitol, outside the Capitol, on the Capitol steps, in Democratic districts and Republican districts and throughout America,” Jeffries said Monday. Yet all these efforts to take down a President when people in actual need of help for disabilities, and other help that these people could spend their time working on they rather spend our tax payer money on this garbage. Then these liberals wonder why they have lost the voters? Why we voted in a RED WAVE in November? But Aguilar on Tuesday offered a similar message, saying Democrats will focus their energies on highlighting the unpopular elements of Trump’s policy agenda including Medicaid cuts and tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans rather than impeachment. Which is the right thing for them to do.

“Right now, we will deal with the tools in front of us,” Aguilar said. “The policies that he and House Republicans have placed forward which are reckless cuts to the health care system, to our supplemental nutrition that is relied on by women and children and families across this country those are the policies that we’re going to push back against. “And those are the items that the American public is paying attention to.” Let's hope that there is some sanity left in the decaying party known as the Democratic Party. But let's take a look back at how the past impeachments of Trump went.

The first impeachment trial stemmed from a call President Trump had with the President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine in which President Trump asked the Ukrainian President to announce two investigations: one involving his potential opponent in the upcoming 2020 presidential election and a second into unsubstantiated allegations that entities within Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 presidential election.1 At the time of the call, the Office of Management and Budget had frozen $400 million in military aid to Ukraine at the direction of the President.2 The contents of the call initially came to light through an intelligence community whistle blower report, but a summary of the call was later made public by President Trump. And proved that he never mentioned any of these things and simply asked "President Volodymyr Zelenskyy" to help end corruption in his country and to investigate what happened with "Cloudstrike" ... 

The House investigation proceeded in two phases. The fact-finding portion of the investigation was primarily handled by the House Intelligence Committee, in cooperation with the Committee on Oversight and Reform and the Committee on Foreign Affairs. The early stage of this phase of the investigation saw some controversy over whether the House must explicitly authorize the initiation of an impeachment investigation. Although the Speaker of the House had announced that the committee investigations constituted an official impeachment inquiry, the White House counsel objected to the investigations on the ground that the investigation lacked the necessary authorization for a valid impeachment proceeding and violated the Due Process Clause.

As a result, the President instructed members of his administration not to cooperate with the House’s unconstitutional inquiry. The House later took action to explicitly approve the impeachment investigation by adopting a resolution authorizing the House committees to continue their ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry into whether sufficient grounds exist . . . to impeach Donald John Trump. Nevertheless, the White House and other Executive Branch offices generally refused to comply with the House investigators requests for information, including subpoenas. Some Executive Branch officials, however, made the individual determination to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry and, as a result, the Intelligence Committee was able to hold a number of investigative hearings and issue a report outlining their findings. The record established in the fact finding phase was then provided to the Judiciary Committee.

Phase two of the impeachment investigation was conducted by the Judiciary Committee. This phase focused on whether the President’s conduct, as uncovered in the fact finding phase of the inquiry, constituted an impeachable offense. Following a series of hearings, the Committee recommended two articles of impeachment against the President, both of which were ultimately approved by the House. The first charged the President with abuse of power, alleging that he had used the powers of his office to solicit Ukraine’s interference in the 2020 election and had conditioned official acts, such as the release of military aid to Ukraine and a White House visit, on President Zelenskyy agreeing to announce the investigations. President Trump, the article alleged, engaged in this scheme or course of conduct for corrupt purposes in pursuit of personal political benefit. The second article charged the President with obstruction of the House impeachment investigation by directing the unprecedented, categorical, and indiscriminate defiance of subpoenas issued by the House of Representatives.

This abuse of office, the article alleged, was subversive of constitutional government and nullif[ied] a vital constitutional safeguard vested solely in the House of Representatives. Although the impeachment articles were adopted by the House on December 18, 2019, the managers were not appointed and the articles not delivered to the Senate until January 15, 2020. The Senate trial was characterized by deep partisan divides and complicated disagreements over questions of law and fact, including presidential motive. But one clear constitutional conflict that arose during the trial involved the proper relationship between impeachment and criminal law. Trial briefs and debate made clear that the House managers and President Trump’s attorneys reached very different conclusions on the question of whether high crimes and misdemeanors require evidence of a criminal act or other legal violation.14 The House, consistent with past impeachment practice, asserted that for purposes of Article II high Crimes and Misdemeanors need not be indictable criminal offenses. 

In response, however, the President’s attorneys asserted that an impeachable offense must be a violation of established law, and that the articles fail[ed] to allege any crime or violation of law whatsoever, let alone ‘high Crimes and Misdemeanors,’ as required by the Constitution. The acquittal provided no clear resolution to these conflicting positions, but the debate over a link between illegal acts and impeachable acts appears to have had some impact on individual Senators. Indeed, the House’s managers’ failure to allege an explicit criminal act appears, along with criticism of the House investigation and failure of the House to prove its case, to have been among the primary reasons given for acquittal.

As the Senate trial proceeded, it became apparent that a major point of contention would be whether the Senate would call its own witnesses. The House managers asked that the Senate authorize subpoenas for relevant Executive Branch documents and for testimony from various White House officials including former National Security Advisor John Bolton.18 With only forty-nine Senators voting in favor, the Senate chose not to approve that request, and the record was limited to the evidence provided by the House. Ultimately, the Senate acquitted President Trump on both counts. Article I failed by a vote of 48-52 while Article II failed by a vote of 47-53.

The second Trump impeachment occurred a year later in the waning days of the Trump presidency following the events on January 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol in which some supporters of President Trump attempted to disrupt the congressional certification of the 2020 presidential election as having been won by Joseph Biden. The House moved quickly following those events. Passing on an investigation, the Judiciary Committee staff compiled publicly available evidence relating to the President’s actions on January 6 and within one week had introduced and approved a single article of impeachment charging the President with incitement to insurrection. Specifically, the article alleged that in the months running up to January 6th the President had consistently issued false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people. He then repeated those claims when addressing a crowd on January 6, and willfully made statements that, in context, encouraged and foreseeable resulted in lawless action at the Capitol. . . . Notably, although the House ultimately impeached President Trump prior to the expiration of his term, the Senate did not commence a trial until after President Trump had left office. 

The Senate trial saw the chamber make two important threshold determinations regarding trials of former Presidents. First, although the Constitution clearly requires the Chief Justice to preside over presidential impeachment trials, the Senate implicitly determined that that requirement does not extend to the trial of a former President. At the opening of the trial, Senator Patrick Leahy, President pro tempore of the United States Senate, was sworn in as presiding officer without objection.

The Senate also made the threshold determination of whether it had the constitutional authority to try a former President. After briefing and debate on the question of whether the Senate had jurisdiction over a former President for acts that occurred during his tenure in office, the Senate explicitly determined by a vote of 56-44 that it did. Thus a majority of Senators, as they have on previous occasions, determined that former officials may be tried by the Senate and, though not removable, remain subject to disqualification from holding future office if convicted. With respect to whether the President had committed an impeachable offense, the main substantive question during the trial arguably revolved around the proper application of the First Amendment. 

The former President’s attorneys invoked the First Amendment as a defense to the impeachment charge, asserting that free speech protections apply and limit the conduct that can be considered an impeachable offense. The President’s political statements at the rally, his attorneys argued, constituted core free speech under the First Amendment and thus not an impeachable offense. 

The House managers disagreed, arguing that The First Amendment has no application in an impeachment proceeding because impeachment does not seek to punish unlawful speech, but instead to protect the Nation from a President who violated his oath of office and abused the public trust. Moreover, even if the First Amendment did restrict the impeachment power, it still would not protect President Trump’s calls to violence, which the managers asserted fell within the well-established category of unprotected speech directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action.

In the end, the First Amendment arguments made by the former President’s attorneys do not appear to have had an impact on Senators, as only one Senator who voted to acquit the former President mentioned the First Amendment in the formal explanation of his vote. Although a majority of Senators voted to convict, former President Trump was ultimately acquitted by a vote of 57-43.

Tuesday, October 31, 2023

Mike Johnson On Biden's Impeachment Inquiry Live


Finally it looks like the search for the truth against Joe Biden is being exposed! Mike Johnson is live talking on this right in the video below... This is Live!



Wednesday, February 3, 2021

Rep. Matt Gaetz will do anything to help Trump!

Gotta love Rep. Matt Gaetz folks this man is a machine! He was born to be a lawyer when you hear him speaks he’s very passionate, and knows what he’s saying. I’ve often found myself wondering how is it nobody on the left debates him? They can’t they know he will eat them alive, and this folks makes for him one day making a heck of a candidte for the highest office in the land. He made it clear on Wednesday he’s willing to stand up for former President Donald Trump in his Senate impeachment trial, even if it means resigning his House seat.

The Florida Republican’s comments came after reports surfaced confirming Trump’s initial legal team had failed to show the same level of commitment.

During a Wednesday interview on the War Room podcast, hosted by Steve Bannon and Raheem Kassam, Gaetz announced he would be willing to resign if Trump asked him to defend him.

“I love my district. I love representing them, but I view this cancellation of the Trump presidency and the Trump movement as one of the major risks to my people, both in my district and all throughout this great country,” Gaetz said.

“If the president called me and wanted me to go defend him on the floor of the Senate, that would be the top priority in my life.”

“I would leave my House seat. I would leave my home. I would do anything I had to do to ensure that the greatest president in my lifetime — one of the greatest presidents our country has ever had, maybe the greatest president our country has ever had — got a full-throated defense that wasn’t crouched down, that wasn’t in fear of losing some moderate Republican senator, but that was worthy of the fight that he gave to the great people of this country for four years.”

In Gaetz’s opinion, when it comes to Trump’s current team, “the president so far has gotten a low-energy defense.”

The news that Trump’s defense has been shaken up recently has left some wondering what’s going on especially because the upcoming impeachment case against the former president is nothing but a complete sham. But I think Trump knows what he’s doing, and I believe he will ride this out, and win this case like the last Impeachment hoax.

House Democratic impeachment managers filed a pre-trial brief with the U.S. Senate on Tuesday claiming Trump “summoned a mob to Washington, exhorted them to a frenzy, and aimed them like a loaded cannon down Pennsylvania Avenue,” referring to the Jan. 6 Capitol incursion. Which folks we all know now is total bullshit, and the Dems bath in bullshit let’s not forget this fact Trump repeatedly called for peace and asked the rioters to go home.

Even if Trump’s words on election fraud did contribute to heating tensions at the Capitol, his complicity pales in comparison to Democrat’s own culpability in heating up tensions with anti-police rhetoric over the course of the last year, which undeniably led to a countless number of riots and looting sprees that raged across the country for months on end especially during the “Summer of Love” and or “The Chop Zone!” Which sounds like a broke auto parts store… lol

Shortly after the Capitol incursion took place, Gaetz made that point quite clear during a fiery speech on the House floor in which he called his Democratic colleagues out for their hypocritical condemnation of then-President Trump.

“Another important point for the country is that this morning President Trump explicitly called for demonstrations and protests to be peaceful,” Gaetz said. “You can moan and groan, but he was far more explicit about his calls for peace than some of the BLM and left-wing rioters were this summer when we saw violence sweep across this nation.”

RELATED: Lindsey Graham Has a Warning for Kamala Harris, Democrats: ‘Be Careful What You Wish For’

Leftists’ lust for power and domination wasn’t satiated by winning the presidency and Senate. They’ll only be satisfied when they completely destroy the one president that showed the world who they really are.

Thankfully, men like Matt Gaetz are willing to do what is right and fight back, even at a great personal cost.

If only more Republicans had the courage to speak out like Gaetz has throughout this entire process.

Lindsey Graham Has a Warning for Kamala Harris, Democrats: 'Be Careful What You Wish For'

A few days away now from now former President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina has a warning for his Democratic colleagues and this one is good. He said the following. “If you’re going to pursue this, and you want to start calling witnesses, and you want to drag this out, it would be fair to have Kamala Harris’ tape played where she bailed people out of jail,” Graham said.

“What more could you do to incite future violence than to pay the bail of the people who broke up the shops and beat up the cops?” he said. “How is that not inciting future violence? Be careful what you wish for, my Democratic colleagues. Be careful what you wish for.”

Trying to prolong a sham trial for political purposes could have a political blowback they’re not counting on.

And VeePee Kamala Harris should be THE primary target, and then her crazy rapist boss JOE BIDEN. Kamala Harris is on record even saying that these people “SHOULD NOT STOP!” So yeah the bitch needs to go now!

Tuesday on Fox News’ “Hannity,” Graham told host Sean Hannity that any Democratic attempt to bring in witnesses to discuss Trump’s alleged role in inciting the Capitol incursion of Jan. 6 would open up a chance for Republicans to bring up Harris’ own words regarding the much more destructive riots the country saw over the summer. Folks about time Lindsey used his god damn head. He let us all down on the 6th, and finally I think is clued in that the whole crap was a work done by the left.

This trial against Trump doesn’t play well with the sane half of the American people who voted for Trump in November, and we want the left to pay for their evil criminal behavior. They need to be sent to prison, and need to FACE THE MUSIC!

Graham’s reference to a “tape” was apparently an error, but there’s no doubt there’s evidence that Harris encouraged the disturbances over the summer that started over the death in police custody of alleged counterfeiter George Floyd in Minneapolis, then spiraled into orgies of destruction around the country.

The woman who’s now a heartbeat from the presidency actually solicited bail money for jailed rioters in Minneapolis after the city’s 3rd Police Precinct was attacked by arsonists.

(That wouldn’t be a good look even if every suspect bailed out was a freedom fighter for social justice. Unfortunately for Minnesota crime victims, that wasn’t quite the case.)

Graham’s words draw new attention to the almost ludicrous double standards Democrats employ with the enthusiastic assistance of the mainstream media when it comes to incitement of violence. In a purely partisan power play, Democrats have impeached a then-sitting president for alleged “incitement of insurrection” when Trump’s own words fail to prove anything of the kind.

In his speech at the “Stop the Steal” rally on Jan. 6, Trump specifically urged his listeners to march “peacefully and patriotically,” according to an Associated Press transcript. Meanwhile, liberals and their media cheerleaders forget or gloss over four years’ worth of violence and intimations of violence from Black Lives Matter activists, “anti-fascist” antifa anarchists and even Democratic lawmakers such as California’s Maxine Waters.

The incursion of Jan. 6 by Trump supporters was inexcusable, of course. But what his political enemies are doing in its aftermath is even worse. It was not Trump or the tens of millions of Americans who support him that created the conditions for the Jan. 6 violence. It was the Democratic Party, its leftist fellow travelers and a grossly, hypocritically complicit mainstream media that spent four years sending a message that violence in pursuit of political goals was acceptable.

Yet Democrats are pursuing an impeachment trial against a man who’s no longer in office with the intent, as made clear in their pretrial brief, of disqualifying Trump from seeking the presidency again.

As bad as Trump’s first impeachment trial was, this second one is worse, and yes friends it’s a total sham trial brought by political enemies that will be presided over by one of the former president’s most outspoken political opponents, with the question of his guilt or innocence literally decided in advance by every member of the potential jury.

After 45 senators voted last week that the impeachment trial itself was unconstitutional, an acquittal is essentially a foregone conclusion. That clearly isn’t stopping Democrats from putting the country through an unnecessary trial of its own, but if patriotism doesn’t motivate them, maybe politics will.

Plenty of Democrats are in line to be hurt if the country starts looking closely at who’s really responsible for the political violence that’s wracked the country for the better part of a year and, as Graham’s interview made clear, Kamala Harris is at the top of the list.

Time she goes down, and I don’t mean just on Willie Brown! LMAO!

Friday, January 22, 2021

Breaking the law again! Schumer says Trump impeachment trial to begin week of Feb. 8

While it is unconstitutional to hold an impeachment trial over a now ex President, and a Citizen breaking the law has not stopped the radical left, and power hungry demented Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said that President Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial will start the week of Feb. 8, announced Friday. Earlier in the day, he said the impeachment article for the trial would head to the Senate Monday, officially triggering the trial process.

The House impeached Trump Jan. 13 for inciting the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol a week earlier. The date is an agreement between Schumer and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. McConnell spokesperson Doug Andres said the Kentucky Republican was “glad” Schumer agreed to their request to delay the trial. The additional weeks to prepare were “a win for due process and fairness,” Andres said. The timing on when the House would transmit the impeachment article had been left in the air as the Senate changed from Republican to Democratic control and worked to quickly confirm several of Biden’s cabinet nominees. Schumer and McConnell have also continued to discuss a power-sharing agreement, since the chamber is split evenly, and the framework for how a trial will operate.

McConnell, the Republican leader from Kentucky, had been pushing for the House to send over its impeachment article next Thursday and not starting the trial proceedings in earnest until mid-February. He argued the delay would allow Trump time to install a legal team. “This impeachment began with unprecedentedly fast and minimal process in the House,” McConnell said on the floor Friday. “The sequel cannot be an insufficient Senate process that denies former President Trump his due process or damages the Senate or presidency itself.” McConnell said on the Senate floor Trump deserved a “full and fair process” for his impeachment trial.  But the House’s transmission of the impeachment article on Monday will start the process of the impeachment trial on Tuesday, several days earlier than McConnell’s original proposed timeline. 

Pelosi, in a statement, confirmed the House would send the article on Monday, applauding the work of the nine House Democrats serving as impeachment managers and highlighting Congress’ “solemn duty.”

“The article of impeachment for incitement of insurrection by Donald Trump will be delivered to the Senate on Monday, January 25,” the California Democrat said. Pelosi, i downplayed GOP concerns that Trump did not have enough time to prepare for the trial, arguing “the former president will have had the same amount of time to prepare for trial as our Managers.” This is another illegal impeachment which once again is being rushed, and under fake, and false claims by the radical left lead by the wicked witch of the west Nasty Nancy Pelosi.

“We are respectful of the Senate’s constitutional power over the trial and always attentive to the fairness of the process,” Pelosi said. “Our Managers are ready to begin to make their case to 100 Senate jurors through the trial process.” This from a woman who called for riots, looting, and burning in 2020.. She needs to be sent to prison for her part of the amount of people dead last year from Covid to the riots. She told people to ignore the Presidents warning, and go maskless in Chinatown and have fun. She’s complicite in many lives lost, and she knows it.

Monday, January 11, 2021

Nasty Nancy Pelosi reveals to 60 Minutes WHY she wants Trump impeached

Nasty Nancy Pelosi insisted Sunday that it’s imperative Donald Trump be impeached so he cannot run for the White House ever again as she, and other Democrats, fear the president could pardon those involved in the storming of the Capitol in his final days.

While some Democrats are pushing for the impeachment route, the House Speaker told ’60 Minutes’ in an interview that will air Sunday night that she prefers invoking the 25th Amendment because it gets Trump out of office immediately.

The article goes on to state the following:

‘There is a possibility that after all of this, there’s no punishment, no consequence, and he could run again for president,’ CBS’ Lesley Stahl posed to Pelosi in a clip released ahead of airing the full interview.

Saturday, January 25, 2020

THE SENATE ASSUMPTIONS TRIAL TO REMOVE TRUMP! 🚨DAY 5🚨

The impeachment trial of President Donald J. Trump resumes Friday, Jan. 24 as Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts presides over the U.S. Senate. Trump’s team will begin opening arguments at 10 a.m. ET. #FoxNews

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

The Heritage Foundation with SEN. Ted Cruz

SEN. CRUZ: Has Trump impeachment been a legitimate process—or partisan weapon? Well that is the question now isn’t it?

Senator Ted Cruz joined the “The Heritage Foundation for a conversation about how the impeachment process has been weaponized against President Trump, and what Americans need to know? How will the Senate trial unfold? Watch the discussion.

America’s Founders did not provide for impeachment as a partisan political weapon or as a response by Congress to a President’s policies with which they disagree. Impeachment is a remedy for serious misconduct by the President and other federal officials that renders them unfit for office.

It is paramount that a presidential impeachment be fair, legitimate, and minimize partisanship.

Check out the YouTube for The Heritage Foundation here here ► https://bit.ly/2otKliy

Sunday, December 15, 2019

Democrat Rep. Jeff Van Drew to become Republican!

That’s right friends known to be against this circus, and one who was one of just two House Democrats to oppose the House’s November vote to set impeachment rules Rep. Jeff Van Drew, anti-impeachment Democrat, expected to switch parties after Trump meeting.

Officials said Saturday that Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, a vocally anti-impeachment Democrat, will join the Republican Party in the coming days delivering a political jolt to Democrats ahead of next week’s expected vote to impeach the president.

The decision, they said, came after Van Drew joined President Trump for a lengthy Friday meeting, during which Trump urged him to join the GOP, and who in an interview with Fox Business last month, said he would vote against articles of impeachment unless he hears evidence against the President that I quote would “rises to the level of treason or a high crime.”

Since we know this is all based on lies, hersey and assumptions and no real evidence of wrongdoing whatsoever by Trump he said the “Founding Fathers had vigorous debates of whether they would even allow impeachment in the Constitution,” and that he favors allowing voters to decide the matter in next year’s election.

This is a very important quote friends read it careful here this is about us! The ones who voted for the PRESIDENT… “You don’t disenfranchise voters, millions upon millions of voters. Voters choose their leaders in America,” – Van Drew said. This is exactly what the left has been trying to do, and like him I’m sure others feel but they’re scared of the machine behind the players we see.

Reports that during conversations between Van Drew and Trump advisers, where the freshman congressman said he was nervous about losing his seat either in a Democratic primary due to his opposition to impeachment in a liberal state or in a general election. A Democratic aide told Fox News that a recent poll his campaign took showed another Democrat would beat him in a primary race. Clearly like I said the machine that runs the party now who put the AOC, and her Socialist Democrat friends, and Fraud Squad together is ready to destroy, and eat alive any of it’s own if they don’t follow their rules, and line.

“It doesn’t mean that I agree with everything the president may have said or done. It means that I don’t believe that these are impeachable offenses,“ he said in an interview Thursday.

Rep. Jeff Van Drew understands this fact, and now has decided to take his talents to Miami Beach like Lebron James… Well not really but the President has so that’s a little joke but seriously Rep. Jeff Van Drew will now take his talents to the “GOP” instead. Like myself I left the DemocRATS midway into Obama’s 2nd term, and I voted for Trump the first Republican I’ve ever voted for, and will vote for him again in 2020 myself. So as for us converts I welcome Rep. Jeff Van Drew to our world.

The world is so clear when you see how the left has the fix in, and we as a people need to remove these evil socialist, communists, and dictators from power. Along with racists, warmonger’s, and it starts with each one of us doing our part. Also we need a speaker of the house who can actually speak. So let’s start by locking up Nasty Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, and Jerry Nadler for the crimes they have committed towards us the American people.

The meeting came the same day that the House Judiciary Committee voted to adopt two articles of impeachment in a party-line vote. The article allege abuse of power and obstruction by Trump. Should the House adopt the articles next week, it could trigger a Senate trial in the new year just as 2020 presidential primaries are about to get underway.

“Today is a solemn and sad day,” Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., told reporters after the vote. “For the third time in a little over a century and a half, the House Judiciary Committee has voted articles of impeachment against the president for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The House will act expeditiously.” Jerry you sir are the one who’s abused his power, and who should be arrested for treason.

There are 31 House Democrats who represent districts Trump carried in the 2016 election, and many of them have been nervous about the political repercussions they would face by voting to impeach Trump. The House Republican campaign committee has already run ads targeting many of them, but most are expected to support Trump’s impeachment, and the Republican-controlled Senate is all but certain to acquit Trump after a trial in January. So stay tuned folks…

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

House DemocRATS released two draft articles of impeachment!

Earlier today, House Democrats released two draft articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump: abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

NADLER Saying Trump will rig the election is hilarious when they have hoaxed this entire thing against Trump, and the entire impeachment b/s is a scam! THE Democrats are the ones trying to rig the election. It’s hilarious how these con artists love to blame TRUMP for their crimes! This is incredible folks…. I think it’s time WE the people hold pro Trump protests outside of CONGRESS! I’m in Miami FL but I’m willing to go, and join the protest of CONGRESS for this lie, and all this nonsense.
These democRATS are evil, and so full of themselves! IT’S time to vote OUT EVERY DemocRAT in the next election.

Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Adam Schiff tied to Burisma Holdings?

Watch this video guys this is amazing! No wonder Adam Schiff has been doing all this nonsense! He’s tied directly not just to the whistleblower! Which we know he lied while in congress during the impeachment inquiry when he said he didn’t know who the “Whistleblower” was. Which is hilarious because he gave himself away when he stops lt. col. Vendman from “OUTING The Whistleblower!” But if he didn’t know who that was how would he know exactly when to stop Vendman from talking? Well now we know… Check this video out folks watch what just broke…

Yes folks UKRAINE INDICTS BURISMA HOLDINGS OWNER, AND ADAM SCHIFF CONNECTED TO BOTH COMPANIES NAMED IN $7.4 BILLION BURISMA-US-UKRAINE CORRUPTION CASE.

Now, according to Breitbart, it turns out Schiff’s House Intelligence Committee has at least two staffers with ties to a think tank partially funded by Burisma Holdings the Ukraine energy company that paid an obscene amount of money to Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, mainly while Biden was the Obama administration’s point man for Ukraine policy.

And one of those staffers is reportedly a friend of Eric Ciaramella, the man suspected of being the “whistleblower” behind the whole impeachment effort. According to a Breitbart report Tuesday, Intelligence Committee staffer Sean Misko signed on with the Democrat-run panel in August, about the time the “whistleblower” filed a complaint with the intelligence community inspector general about a phone call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky.

According to Breitbart, Misko in 2015 was a “millennium fellow” for the Atlantic Council, a think tank partially funded by Burisma Holdings, which has become infamous for its connection to Hunter Biden who was paid $50,000 per month salary to serve on its board from April 2014 to April 2019.

Misko is the second Intelligence Committee staffer to have ties to the Atlantic Council, according to Breitbart. Thomas Eager, another member of the Intelligence Committee staff, is currently a fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Congressional Fellowship, a program that “educates staff on current events in the Eurasia region.”

During the 2016 election year, according to Breitbart, other funders of the Atlantic Council included Google, liberal billionaire George Soros’ Open Society network, and the law firm of Perkins Coie, which represented the Hillary Clinton campaign in hiring Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm that produced the Steele dossier. Small world, huh?

In October, Breitbart reported that Eager was part of an Atlantic Council trip to Ukraine in August that included a meeting with acting Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor, who in November was a key witness in Schiff’s impeachment hearings a trip that took place 10 days after the “whistleblower” complaint was first filed

If that wasn’t all chummy enough, it sounds like Misko and Eric Ciaramella, the suspected “whistleblower,” were on very friendly terms, according to Breitbart’s report, and before working for the House Intelligence Committee, Misko was the director for the Gulf States at the National Security Council from 2015 to mid-2018, according to the Washington Examiner, and at the time, Ciaramella, who is now an analyst with the CIA, was also a part of the NSC.

The men had “had similarly antagonistic attitudes toward the Trump administration and were witnessed by a former National Security Council official, like Ciaramella, a nonpolitical appointee, to frequently be around one another,” the Washington Examiner reported.

So, Schiff has already acknowledged that his staff’s contacts with the so-called “whistleblower” were closer than he let on, and lied while in congress again when he says he doesn’t know who this “Whistleblower” is, and yet knows when to shut Vendeman up.

If Ciamarella really is the “whistleblower” and attorneys for the “whistleblower” have never denied it then it sounds like those contacts were closer than previously reported. “My understanding was that they were friendly with one another,” a former NSC official, described as “senior” to Ciaramella, told the Washington Examiner. “They would walk around the halls. Get lunch together and stuff like that.”

He told the Examiner they were “very much cut from the same cloth,” and their friendship was “bro-like.” So, this impeachment inquiry farce was not only sparked by a complaint from a “whistleblower” based on second-hand information, but it is also being handled by a staff with at least two members who have ties to a think tank financially supported by a company at the heart of an important part of the whole affair.

And to top it all off, one of those staffers could well have a “bro-like” friendship with the “whistleblower” that includes shared “antagonistic attitudes toward the Trump administration.” So now you know WHY Adam Schiffhead has been leading the charge in these bogus inquiry hearings or whatever he’s calling it this week, and also why he’s lied so much during the hearings.

Friday, August 9, 2019

Jerry Nadler is EVIL case closed! This man is crazy.

Jerry Nadler, (House Judiciary Committee Chairman) (D-N.Y.) confirmed on Thursday that his committee has now launched “formal impeachment proceedings” into the alleged misconduct of President Donald Trump.

Appearing on CNN, (FAKE NEWS) Nadler said people shouldn’t be “hung up on the semantics” since his committee is “investigating” the facts and evidence. Meaning “Hey doesn’t matter if he’s guilty or if this is even based on reality we’re can’t beat Trump in 2020 so we’re doing this.

He said that he “wasn’t waiting” for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who has been publicly reluctant to support impeachment, but added that she’s been “very cooperative” with his investigation. So let me guess this right they want to impeach someone based on fake information created by Hillary Clinton, and others who are the actual ones which need to be looked into. There has to be a way to stop Jerry and the evil left from this twisted plot and agenda of theirs.

After being pressed as to whether his investigation was considered an “official formal impeachment” Nadler insisted that’s what it is. But again I ask! BASED ON WHAT GROUNDS? This man is fucking stupid, crazy or sold out? It became clear during the Candace Owens congress hearing where she busted Rep.: “Mr. Lieu” trying to bismerch her good name! She brutually, and amazingly destroyed him but look how fucking stupid Nadler is.
Like she says! They do “Believe That Black People Are Stupid” but Jerry is both deaf, and dumb. IF you haven’t seen that video check it out.


“This is formal impeachment proceedings,” Nadler said. “We are investigating all the evidence, we’re gathering the evidence and we will at the conclusion of this, hopefully by the end of the year, vote to, vote articles of impeachment to the House floor or we won’t. That’s a decision that we’ll have to make. But that — that’s exactly the process we’re in right now.”

“All right, so when you say formal impeachment proceedings, have you started drafting or preparing articles of impeachment should you need them?” host Erin Burnett asked.

“There are articles of impeachment introduced a number of months ago and referred to the committee,” Nadler responded. “As the investigation proceeds, we may want to draft our own articles of impeachment that may more closely fit the evidence. We’ll see.”