Federal Funding STOPPED! Why I LOVE This!

OK This makes me very happy to read friends as it's now coming in that all Federal Funding will STOP for any College, School, or University that allows illegal protests. Agitators will be imprisoned/or permanently sent back to the country from which they came. American students will be "permanently expelled" or, depending on on the crime, arrested. NO MASKS! Thank you for your attention to this matter. First victim in the wake of this news "Columbia University just had it's funds canceled and it's about $400 Million. 

IF You don't like it here go back to your country. WE Don't need more freeloading American hating dorks here. The Trump administration moved Friday to cancel $400 million in grants and contracts to Columbia University, citing "the school's continued inaction in the face of persistent harassment of Jewish students."

"Since October 7, Jewish students have faced relentless violence, intimidation, and antisemitic harassment on their campuses only to be ignored by those who are supposed to protect them," Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said. "Universities must comply with all federal anti discrimination laws if they are going to receive federal funding. For too long, Columbia has abandoned that obligation to Jewish students studying on its campus. Today, we demonstrate to Columbia and other universities that we will not tolerate their appalling inaction any longer."

"We are reviewing the announcement from the federal agencies and pledge to work with the federal government to restore Columbia's federal funding. We take Columbia's legal obligations seriously and understand how serious this announcement is and are committed to combating antisemitism and ensuring the safety and well being of our students, faculty, and staff," a Columbia University spokesperson said. Columbia students reacted to the news. "If those are the necessary steps needed to incentivize the school to make a positive step for Jewish students, that's what needs to be done," student Maya Cukieman said.

"Can these students stand up for what they believe in without compromising their future? Not really," student Wesley Epps said. "President Armstrong and the Columbia Board of Trustees must understand that their continued inaction on support for terror and antisemitism on campus have serious consequences. While initial steps have been taken to address these issues, they are broadly insufficient. 

This move by the federal government hurts all of us, including numerous Jewish graduate students and workers at Columbia who are supported by federal funding. We hope that Columbia responds accordingly in order to prevent further cuts," student group Columbia Jewish & Israeli Students said in a statement.

"This move is the latest escalation by the Trump administration to coerce colleges and universities into censoring student speech and advocacy that isn't MAGA-approved, like criticizing Israel or supporting Palestinian rights. It is unconstitutional and unprecedented, but it is entirely consistent with Trump's long-held desire to silence views with which he disagrees and clamp down on protest," 

New York Civil Liberties Union executive director Donna Lieberman said. "Protected political speech should not be a basis of punishment, and Title VI must be applied consistently with the First Amendment. With little regard for the Constitution and case law, it is no surprise that the Trump administration prefers to see what it can get away with."

"Withdrawing millions of dollars in grants, often funding medical research, to essentially punish free speech is unconstitutional, and i think ineffective way to achieve the important goal of stopping antisemitsm," said First Amendment attorney Ian Rosenberg. Earlier this week, President Trump threatened to pull funding from schools that allowed what he called "illegal protests."

"All Federal Funding will STOP for any College, School, or University that allows illegal protests," Mr. Trump posted on social media Tuesday morning. "Agitators will be imprisoned/or permanently sent back to the country from which they came. American students will be permanently expelled or, depending on on the crime, arrested. NO MASKS!"

Mr. Trump's statement on Tuesday came on the heels of the Department of Education, Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. General Services Administration announcing a comprehensive review of Columbia's federal contracts. 

The administration cited potential violations to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Columbia has more than $5 billion in federal grant commitments. "This is only the beginning," said Leo Terrell, head of the DOJ Task Force to Combat Antisemitism. "Cancelling these taxpayer funds is our strongest signal yet that the federal government is not going to be party to an educational institution like Columbia that does not protect Jewish students and staff." Mr. Trump's statement also raised questions about what constitutes an illegal protest.

AL GREEN CENSURED for Outburst at Trump Speech!

Time this moron is removed from all politics as AL Green is one of the worst people on Congress. This guy looks filthy, and acts like how he looks. Like he's been rolling around in cow shit. Now this was bipartisan by both sides of lawmakers who voted to censure Representative Al Green following his outburst during President Donald Trump's address to a joint session of Congress.

A rare rebuke, censuring does not remove a member from office but serves as a formal statement of disapproval with potential political consequences. Green, a Democrat from Texas, was disciplined for shouting at Trump during his speech and was asked to be removed from the chamber by House Speaker Mike Johnson. Green has been a longtime critic of Trump, having filed multiple impeachment resolutions against the president, including one after his outburst. Following the vote, Green defended his actions, saying he "was making it clear to the president that he has no mandate to cut Medicaid." 

Censure is a formal and public reprimand issued by a legislative body to express disapproval of a member's actions. Unlike expulsion, it does not remove the individual from office but serves as a condemnation that can impact their influence and reputation in the House. Green's actions have sparked debate about the boundaries of political protest within Congress, particularly during high-profile addresses by the president. His supporters argue that his protest was justified, while critics including members of his party viewed it as an inappropriate breach of protocol.

Approximately 10 House Democrats voted with several Republicans for Green's reprimand. 

Those who voted in favor included:

1. Ed Case of Hawaii
2. Tom Suozzi of New York
3. Jim Costa of California
4. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington
5. Jared Moskowitz of Florida
6. Ami Bera of California
7. Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania
8. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio
9. Laura Gillen of New York
10. Jim Himes of Connecticut

Some of these representatives hail from swing districts or moderate-leaning constituencies, which went red for Trump in the 2024 election.

Green is not the first lawmaker to disrupt a president during a congressional address. In 2009, Representative Joe Wilson, a South Carolina Republican, shouted "You lie!" at then-President Barack Obama during a speech on health care reform. The House later reprimanded Wilson. More recently, in 2024 and 2023, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, interrupted then-President Joe Biden during his State of the Union address. She did not face formal censure.

Which Other Politicians Have Been Censured?

Historically, only a handful of lawmakers have faced this formal rebuke. One of the most recent cases before Green was Republican Representative Paul Gosar of Arizona, who was censured in 2021 after posting an animated video that depicted violence against Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat.

The move to censure Gosar was supported mainly by Democrats, with only two Republicans voting in favor. In 2023, Democratic Representative Rashida Tlaib of Michigan was censured for her remarks regarding the Israel-Hamas conflict. The resolution accused her of promoting rhetoric that was deemed antisemitic by critics. Another prominent censure occurred in 2010, when Democratic Representative Charles Rangel of New York was censured for 11 ethics violations related to tax evasion and improper use of congressional resources. The House overwhelmingly voted to censure Rangel.

What's Next for Al Green?

Green has vowed to continue speaking out against Trump and his policies. However, the censure could impact his standing within the Democratic Party and among key House committees. Historically, censured lawmakers have faced challenges securing leadership positions and committee assignments. Meanwhile, the broader conversation about decorum in Congress is likely to continue.

Trump Admin Pauses Aid to Ukraine

Thank you Mr President! So it looks like there is a pause coming days after a tense exchange between Trump and the Ukrainian president in the Oval Office which has lead to a lot of heated back and forth online. A LOT of Americans feel as I do that should stop feeding them our Money, and Military aid. There comes a time and place where one has to get tough on cases like these if not the war will never end in peace. So when we hear that Impact could be ‘crippling’ so kidding? LMAO But I don't think anyone here is going to lose sleep over it and so President Donald Trump is ordering a pause on shipments of US military aid to Ukraine after his heated and disrespectful action in the Oval Office when he started the argument with President Trump.

The halt in aid, which came after Trump held a series of meetings with top national security officials at the White House, could have dire effect on Ukraine’s war-fighting abilities, officials and analysts said. It will remain in place until Trump determines Zelensky has made a commitment to seeking peace talks, one official said, essentially forcing Ukraine to a negotiating table by threatening further losses on the battlefield. “The president has been clear that he is focused on peace. We need our partners to be committed to that goal as well. We are pausing and reviewing our aid to ensure that it is contributing to a solution,” the White House official said.

After more than a week of open hostility between Washington and Kyiv, Monday’s pause was the most material sign of how far the relationship has deteriorated since Trump took office and refused to keep letting this Ukrainian actor and wannabe President one Zelenskyy take our tax payers for a ride. In recent weeks, Trump has tried to get Russian President Vladimir Putin’s to come to a peaceful end to the war, and we laugh that the left is defending Zelenskyy when saying Trump falsely is claiming Ukraine started the war and accusing Zelensky of being a dictator, but wait he was afterall who said he would not allow Ukraine to have anymore elections and would stay in power. This friends this is a Dictator. He even dresses like Fidel Castro.

Trump based his decision to halt the delivery of military aid in a move that could have real consequences for the balance of the conflict and strengthen Putin’s hand. The pause will apply to all military equipment not yet inside Ukraine, officials said, and amounts to a direct response to what Trump views as Zelensky’s bad behavior last week. Ukraine could likely sustain its current fighting pace for several weeks perhaps until the start of the summer before a US pause would begin to have a major effect, Western officials said in the wake of the decision. The Biden administration rushed shipments of weapons to Ukraine in its waning days, providing the country with large stockpiles of advanced weapons.

It is those sophisticated weapons including the long-range ATACMS missiles that have allowed Ukraine to strike deep into Russian territory, a strategy that could suffer if those weapons remain paused. While European nations may be able to replace US shipments of artillery, supplemented by Ukraine’s own growing defense industry, the most advanced weapons used by Kyiv come from the United States. “The impact is going to be big. I would call it crippling,” said Mark Cancian, a senior adviser with the Center for Strategic and International Studies who has closely followed the war. Cancian estimated that Ukraine would feel the impacts of the pause in aid within two to four months, as aid from European countries helps Kyiv remain in the fight for now. “That’s why they don’t fall off a cliff, but when your supplies get cut in half, eventually that shows up on the front lines,” Cancian said. “Their front lines would continue to buckle and eventually they would break and Ukraine would have to accept an adverse even catastrophic peace settlement.”

But Cancian warned the Trump administration has more forms of aid to Ukraine that can be paused or canceled altogether, including intelligence sharing and the training of Ukrainian forces. “There might be a way out of this, but it’s going to be extremely humiliating for Zelensky,” Cancian said.

According to several officials, Trump and his senior aides are seeking an acknowledgement from Zelensky potentially in the form of a public apology before moving ahead with a deal on Ukraine’s rare earth minerals, which had been close to agreement before Friday’s meeting, or a discussion on continuing foreign aid. The decision to halt the aid was made later on Monday, one person said, and is part of a pressure strategy on Ukraine.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly called for Zelensky to apologize for Friday in an interview on CNN. The halt puts Trump even more clearly at odds with the United States’ traditional European allies like Britain and France, who made clear their support for Zelensky at a summit in London on Sunday. “There is a capability gap that Europe cannot fill alone,” one US official said. A European official called the Trump administration’s decision to pause military aid to Ukraine “petty and wrong.” The official said it will immediately deepen distrust in the US government among the Ukrainian people. The official also predicted it will cause unnecessary civilian casualties, as Ukraine will not be able to defend against Russian air attacks after they run out of air defense missiles.

Since the start of the war, the Biden administration announced 74 separate packages of military aid pulled directly from US inventories, allowing the critical munitions and supplies to flow quickly to Ukraine. The largest of these packages was nearly $3 billion, though most were far smaller. Zelensky has repeatedly thanked the US for the weapons on social media, as well as in calls and meetings with American officials. The pause comes one day after a defense official told CNN that military aid to Ukraine announced by the Biden administration was still flowing. Those shipments included critical munitions such as anti-tank weapons, thousands of artillery rounds, and rockets. Those shipments were expected to continue for several weeks, but the decision from the Trump administration freezes the aid that was en route. “DoD is also providing other capabilities, such as armored vehicles, as soon as required repairs are completed,” the defense official said on Sunday. The US had set up facilities in Poland to repair Western equipment damaged on the battlefield before sending it back to the Ukrainian military.

There are also multiple longer-term contracts between arms manufacturers and the US to send weapons systems and air defense systems to Ukraine. “This is a critical time for Ukraine. And I managed the Ukraine supplemental last year that provided additional help to Ukraine, and I do not think we should be pausing our efforts. It’s the Ukrainians who are shedding blood,” the Maine Republican said. Collins acknowledged that Congress may not be able to do anything to ensure Ukraine continues to receive aid from the US. “A lot of it is linked to the president’s draw down authority,” she noted, pointing to accusations during former President Joe Biden’s term that he had “slow walked” aid. “Unfortunately, we’ve seen this movie before, and I remain convinced that it’s not only in Ukraine’s interest but our interest to back Ukraine because Putin is not going to stop there,” she said.

House Foreign Affairs Chair Republican Rep. Brian Mast told CNN he “knew it was an option” for the Trump administration to pause all US military aid to Ukraine. “I think people can assume that everything is on the table with Ukraine right now,” he said.

Dan Bongino NEW FBI deputy director

Oh wow this is awesome news friends! Just got word that Ex-Secret Service agent and conservative media personality Dan Bongino has been officially picked as FBI deputy director under Kash Patel. Dan who has penned best-selling books, ran unsuccessfully for office and gained fame as a conservative pundit with TV shows and a popular podcast both on YouTube and later both there and Rumble where he has some ownership in. This was ordered by the man himself President Donald Trump as he announced the appointment Sunday night in a post on his Truth Social platform, praising Bongino as “a man of incredible love and passion for our Country.” He called the announcement “great news for Law Enforcement and American Justice.”

The selection places two staunch Trump allies atop the nation’s premier federal law enforcement agency at a time when Democrats are concerned that the president could seek to target his adversaries. Bongino would serve under Kash Patel, who was sworn in as FBI director at the White House on Friday and who has signaled his intent to reshape the bureau, including by relocating hundreds of employees from its Washington headquarters and placing greater emphasis on the FBI’s traditional crime-fighting duties.

The deputy director serves as the FBI’s second-in-command and is traditionally a career agent responsible for the bureau’s day-to-day law enforcement operations. Bongino, like Patel, has never served in the FBI, raising questions about their experience level when the U.S. is facing escalating national security threats. The two are inheriting an FBI gripped by turmoil as the Justice Department over the past month has forced out a group of senior bureau officials and made a highly unusual demand for the names of thousands of agents who participated in investigations related to the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. Bongino served on the presidential details for then-Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush, before becoming a popular right-wing figure. He became one of the leading personalities in the Make America Great Again political movement to spread false information about the 2020 election, which Trump and allies have continued to maintain was marred by widespread false even though such claims have been widely rejected as false by judges and former Trump attorney general William Barr.

For a few years following Rush Limbaugh’s death in 2021, he was chosen for a radio show on the same time slot of the famous commentator. Bongino worked for the New York Police Department for several years in the 1990s before joining the Secret Service. He began doing commentary on Fox News more than a decade ago, and had a Saturday night show with the network from 2021 to 2023. He is now a host of The Dan Bongino Show, one of the most popular podcasts, according to Spotify. Bongino ran for a U.S. Senate seat in Maryland in 2012 and for congressional seats in 2014 and 2016 in Maryland and Florida, after moving in 2015. He lost the three races. During an interview last fall, Bongino asked Trump to commit to forming a commission to reform the Secret Service, calling it a “failed” agency and criticizing it for the two assassination attempts last year.

“That guy should have been nowhere near you,” Bongino said about the man who authorities say camped outside Trump’s golf course in West Palm Beach, Florida, before he was spotted with a rifle. During the same interview, Trump praised the Secret Service agent who saw the rifle’s barrel coming out of a bush. Patel and Bongino will succeed the two acting FBI leaders, Brian Driscoll and Robert Kissane, who have led the bureau since the departure in January of former Director Christopher Wray, who was appointed by Trump in 2017 and held the job for the next seven years before resigning at the end of the Biden administration to make way for his chosen success.

Ilhan Omar to be deported?

They need to stop messing around with this evil clown Ilhan Omar. She needs to be sent packing back to Somalia and never allowed back into this country as she is clearly an enemy of this country. How she's being voted into office is beyond me as she's not doing a good job in any capacity and has shown flashes of being pure evil and corrupt. Now with Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) circulating a petition for his supporters to sign to deport Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) needs to happen. Gil had previously called on Omar to be deported, arguing she is more loyal to undocumented immigrants in the United States from her native Somalia than to the United States. The petition and an email circulated by Gill were first reported by Axios. 

Omar became a U.S. citizen in 2000 after fleeing her native country due to civil war. The Minnesota representative has been the target of Republican insults following her staunch criticism of President Trump during his first administration. “Friend, we should have never let Ilhan Omar into our country. And frankly, America would be a much better place if she were to be sent back to Somalia,” Gill wrote in the email which included a picture of him next to President Trump. As in the past, he criticized Omar for discussing how to evade Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. “Recently, it came out that Ilhan Omar is hosting free workshops for Somalians, who are in our country illegally, on how to evade ICE and deportation. It could not be more blatant: Ilhan Omar is more loyal to illegal Somalians than she is to the United States, or the office she was elected to,” he added. Several Democrats criticized the most recent remarks by Gil, a freshman member of the new Congress. 

“⁦@SpeakerJohnson⁩, get control of your caucus before we have to take other actions. This is demeaning & embarrassing,” Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wisc.) said in a post on X. “We all need to be better than this shit. I expect an answer today.”

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) also raised concerns with the GOP member’s comments. “It’s disgusting that Republicans are attempting to raise money by threatening to deport a US citizen just because they disagree with her,” she wrote on X. “Ilhan Omar is a tireless advocate for her district, a fierce protector of our democracy, and I know these fascist threats won’t keep her down.”

But this corruption is not just her as we seen AOC the Village IDIOT in NY might end up in prison for doing webinars on helping illegals avoid ICE, and openly says to not follow the law of the land ON VIDEO. Hence why she really is The Village Idiot. Check out the video below... This is hilarious and scary.      

This is the resistance? LMAO

Why does this always seem to be the pattern here.. Just think this so called anti Trump resistance always looks a certain way, and act in an evil twisted anti American way... Besides the obvious people in congress, and corrpupt DA like FATASS Letitia James, and Fani Willis. 

Check out these LOW IQ Demons on social media thinking that the majority of the people are behind their idiotic mindsets.

Why do these people always look like this? pic.twitter.com/EC8AVjdtdc

— Penny Calls a Lid 🇺🇸🇮🇹 (@PSwal807) February 14, 2025

What does thing thing think Congress does? Well right now the majority of Congress House, and Senate are Republican, and the President is Republican and we're fighting to keep this country great with less inflation, lower taxes, stopping corruption and while Trump is doing the best for this country these liberal idiots keep resisting? Resisting to what you morons? But boy oh boy why is it they all look like side show freaks? Seriously?

Why do these people always look like this? pic.twitter.com/rpSqbyERAD

— Penny Calls a Lid 🇺🇸🇮🇹 (@PSwal807) February 14, 2025

NYC Anti-ICE protesters Arrested!

Oh yeah remember these are "THE FUCK AROUND and FIND OUT" times... These morons are about to find out that when we say if you harbor or protect illegals, and you are for stopping ICE from doing the work WE VOTED this administration to do you will be arrested.

Isn’t this what Hakeem wanted?! We’re gonna fight in the streets.

Why are Democrats so violent? https://t.co/tJMnd8fCW5

— ISawTheLightMAGA🇺🇸 (@JettPlain9) February 14, 2025

Look all these morons sticking up for ILLEGAL activity.. Such moronic behavior from these libtards.

Protesters took to the streets of lower Manhattan to denounce and protest U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on Thursday evening Feb. 13, a group of about 400 protesters marched from the ICE building at Federal Plaza near Foley Square to the ICE Officer at West Houston and Vertex Street in SoHo. The protest came hours after Mayor Eric Adams met with President Donald Trump’s Border Czar Tom Homan. 

The meeting resulted in the city reopening the ICE facility at the Rikers Island jail complex. The group was seen carrying several banners and signs in English and Spanish, shouting, “Mayor Eric Adams must go; he doesn’t care about immigrant communities.” One protester, Jason Darlugo of Nicaragua, told the crowd while fighting back tears, “I came here to give my family a better chance at life.” 

NYPD Officers on foot patrol, motorcycles, and bicycles kept up with the group and attempted to cut the group route off several times. Some protesters attempted to agitate the officers. Six protesters were arrested and taken into police custody during the protest, though at this time, the NYPD could not confirm further details.

The group ended the march with, “Thank you for taking a stand against Donald Trump, I.C.E., and Mayor Eric Adams on this pivotal day in New York and American history.” Over the past few weeks since President Donald Trump was sworn in, ICE raids have been taking place in New York City, one of the more notable raids taking place in the Bronx. In that particular raid, Trump’s Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was on site and there were 20 reported arrests.

In response to the raids, NYPD brass claimed that the department is only working with ICE to arrest those who have committed a crime. The Adams administration also noted in a recent memo that city employees, including those in public schools and hospitals, should allow federal immigration authorities to search city property or hand them requested information, even without a warrant, particularly if they feel threatened. Adams faced backlash for that memo, with immigration leaders and politicians rallying outside City Hall last week to denounce the directive.

Disclosure on UAP-UFO-USO's coming!?

YES You read it right according to the one and only Anna Paulina Luna will be leading a House task force on declassification of some our country's biggest hidden secrets and biggest conspiracy theorists are going to enjoy this. To me the citizens of this country as you know have become increasingly concerned about the lack of transparency and disclosure on issues pertaining to Non-Human Intelligence (NHI), Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), and Unidentified Submersible Objects (USO). For decades the talks in many conspiracy circles have been about the embargo on the truth about what the Government knows. 

With this said on Inside Tha Jackals Head myself Angel Espino as host of that show have said in the past that Trump was going to move to not just drain the swamp, end corruption and he would disclose our biggest hidden secrets including the JFK, RFK and Alien stuff. Truth is I didn't expect the release of the MLK files but those never really had the talking heads going like disclosure on these other topics. The big one being Aliens, UFO's, UAP's, USO's and so on. On my podcast this has been a main focus for over a good 14 years now that I've been on air.



 It's about time we get full disclosure but like I've said before we will get what they have on paper which I don't expect that to be "Full Disclosure" as most of the stuff might not be written down as this is how secrets are kept. But they're not just going to put out what they have but there will be an investigation according to the Trump White House on this because with all the drone activity and all the sightings and reports and interest well. This is time. Also remember I said I believed Trump would be our disclosure President. Also keep in mind why I think this. Before Roswell, and after WW' 2 Nikola Tesla passed on and he was working on exotic tech which include free energy, and even a UFO like craft.

When he died Donald Trump's uncle John Trump was part of the recovery team which went to get the paper work, and belongings of Tesla who died broke, and never got the recognition alive he deserved.. Now fast forward to today and we have President Trump and Elon Musk working together. Elon Musk owns SPACE X, and "TESLA" Cars... He's also about the Smartest and richest man on the planet. Folks we're on for a great 2025 if all things fall in place how I'm expecting. Keep in mind for the most part also they don't mention USO's much but she does and this is interesting because I've long held the theory that most of these orbs, crafts, and other things "Alien" which we think are coming from deep space are actually from inside out planet deep in the ocean below and they have very intelligent beings down there who can communicate and have tech which are far more advanced than ours on top. This is why I do think this topic is so hot right now and why we need to be told not just what is coming from space but what is right under our feet deep in our oceans darkest parts.

The issue is not only a matter of being transparent and open about the subject but also the dangers we're facing in our aviation safety and again we have a global right to know whether we are truly alone in the universe. According to the National UAP Task Force, there were 144 reports of encounters between U.S. military and unidentified phenomena between 2004 and 2021, highlighting the need for more transparent investigations and communications. We believe that it is possible to confirm the existence of these phenomena without jeopardizing national security or disclosing sensitive technology. At this point I don't think that will be much of a problem as we don't wanna have people thrown in prison for keeping this secret. We just want to be told the truth and so we all can move on and build our way into Space with out space brothers, and sisters.

YOU'RE LOCKED OUT!

This is amazing, and great to witness... The SWAMP is being LOCKED OUT! Literally. 

So this comes on the heels of the NY DA Letitia James continuing her witch hunt on Trump after multiple warning to step off and back down from her lawless activity. NOW it's come time for her to pay the piper as she's getting closer, and close to getting her fat ass thrown in prison along with Diddy!

Now reports also come out from Roger Stone and others than Letitia James might herself be enrolled in doing herself what she's accused Trump of doing? Well what? You mean she inflated money value of a property? Well this is just hilarious.

President Donald Trump said in an exclusive interview with the New York Post on Saturday that he revoked the security clearance for some former Democratic officials and current legal authorities, following his decision to do the same for former President Joe Biden earlier this week.

So what does this mean? Why It Matters? Well when Trump announced on Friday that he had revoked Biden's security clearance and discontinuing the daily intelligence briefings that Biden had been receiving retaliation for Biden doing the same to Trump in 2021 due to "erratic behavior" and the concern he would disclose sensitive information. Traditionally, former presidents continue to receive intelligence briefings even after leaving office. However, in a post on Friday, Trump claimed that Biden used his tenure to instruct the intelligence community to prevent Trump from accessing national security information after he left office.

But we know Biden and his co-conspirators of corruption need to be cutoff at the knees, and not allowed to know anything going on in anyway when it comes to security Clarence. Also they should do this to the Obama's, Clinton's, and Bush clan... This also should extend to Nancy Pelosi, and A LOT of liberals, and conspirators of being Anti America first.

Trump on Saturday told the New York Post in an exclusive interview that he would revoke the clearance of eight additional Democrats, which the newspaper wrote was meant to "punish" them. Without their clearance, the officials will not be allowed to access classified information or enter federal facilities.

The list includes:

• Biden's Secretary of State Antony Blinken
• New York Attorney General Letitia James
• Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg
• former national security adviser Jake Sulivan
• Biden's deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco
• Lawyers Andrew Weissmann, Mark Zaid and Norm Eisen

Each of those listed were at some point involved with investigations into Trump. James and Bragg both brought cases against Trump. James brought a civil fraud lawsuit against Trump's real estate company ahead of the 2024 election. Trump maintains his innocence, and the judgment of now over $500 million, including interest, is on appeal. Bragg led the hush money case against Trump that led to 34 counts of falsifying business records related to payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels that led to a conviction and a largely symbolic "unconditional discharge" sentence. Trump has maintained his innocence and is appealing the case as well.

James is also leading a new lawsuit against Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) for its access to sensitive payment systems in the Treasury Department. "This is to take away every right they have [revoking security clearances] including they can't go into [federal] buildings," Trump told the Post, which characterized the revocation as largely symbolic rather than consequential for James and Bragg. However, neither will be able to enter the U.S. attorney's offices for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York.

What Are People Saying? 

Norm Eisen, who now serves as a senior fellow at Brookings, wrote on BlueSky: "I take my inclusion on Trump's list as a backhanded compliment in response to our court successes against his administration this week. And I intend to return it in the best way I know how: by filing many more lawsuits against his and his cronies' wrongdoing."

Brian Krassenstein, entrepreneur and anti-Trump internet personality, wrote on X, formerly Twitter: "These actions are unprecedented in a democracy. This is not about national security it's a calculated move of political retribution and obstruction. By targeting officials involved in investigations and foreign policy, Trump is undermining the rule of law and putting America's security at risk."

Laura Loomer, a conservative activist, wrote on X: "President Trump just REVOKED the security clearances of the following 8 Democrat lawfare agents," adding, "They are now forbidden from walking inside any Federal buildings since they illegally weaponized law fare to carry out election interference. I told you it would be a spicy weekend full of firings and demotions! A little birdie at the White House told me ... Stay tuned! Even MORE is coming this weekend." With nine officials losing security clearances over the past two days, it is possible Trump is not done and will revoke clearance from other former Democrat officials and lawyers especially if Loomer's warning pans out.

What are they frightened about?

So a liberal Judge in New York has put a temporary hold on Elon Musk, and President Trump + DOGE’s Treasury Access.! All this after we find out where the waste of the USAID money is going and liberals are up in arms cause the end of the gravy train is done, and so here Are All The Major Lawsuits Against Trump. Question is what is the left so scared about huh?

A New York judge has temporarily barred Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from accessing a sensitive Treasury payment system, after over a dozen Democratic states sued late Friday the latest in a slew of legal actions as Democrats and others fight President Donald Trump and cost-cutting Elon Musk in court. But what are these people so scared about? Hmmm Remember these activist DA's like Letitia James are known to go and get whatever they want from Liberal Judges and this is who "Judge Paul Englemayer" is and it's no different than the people used against the Trials vs Trump before he won re election. They're always going to find a way to lie, cheat and steal with these liberal NY Judges... Simple as that. This is part of the corruption these liberals keep hiding in.

Feb. 8Judge Paul Engelmayer ruled political appointees and “special government employees”—like members of Musk’s team—must be cut of from access from the Treasury’s systems until another New York-based judge can rule on the issue next week.

Engelmeyer’s ruling came after a group of 19 Democratic state attorneys general sued Trump over DOGE’s Treasury access, arguing the move put personal information at risk, exceeded Treasury’s legal authority and could lead to DOGE unconstitutionally blocking spending that’s already been approved by Congress (a court order in a separate lawsuit said only two DOGE staffers can have read-only access).

Feb. 7A group of states that sued Trump over last week’s sweeping federal grant freeze alleged in a filing they “continue to be denied access to federal funds” even though a judge put the freeze on hold, claiming “scattershot outages” have cut them off from accessing several Biden-era grant programs.

Feb. 7Judge Carl Nichols—, a Trump appointee, blocked a plan to put 2,200 U.S. Agency for International Development staff on paid leave as of Friday, part of Trump’s gambit to wind down the foreign aid agency, multiple news outlets reported—a temporary reprieve following a lawsuit by a federal employees’ union calling Trump’s efforts to dismantle USAID without Congress’ permission “unconstitutional and illegal.”

Feb. 7The Justice Department agreed to not name the FBI agents involved in the Jan. 6 investigation before a judge rules on two lawsuits from FBI agents that argued the dissemination of the agents’ names could threaten their employment, reputation and wellbeing.

Feb. 7The University of California Student Association sued the Department of Education accusing Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency of illegally accessing “sensitive personal and financial information” of about 42 million federal student loan borrowers.

Feb. 6Boston-based Judge George O’Toole paused a Thursday deadline for over 2 million federal employees to accept a buyout offer—part of Trump and Musk’s cost-cutting push—as he considers whether to grant a request by federal workers’ unions who sued to block the buyouts, extending the deadline until Monday.

Feb. 6Judge John Coughenour in Seattle extended his pause on Trump’s day-one executive order rescinding birthright citizenship for the children of undocumented or temporary immigrants, in response to a lawsuit brought by Democratic-led states, writing, “The president cannot change, limit, or qualify this Constitutional right via an executive order.”

Feb. 6D.C.-based Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly said only two Musk-affiliated staffers can access the Treasury Department’s payment system on a “read only” basis, after workers’ unions sued the Treasury amid reports Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency accessed sensitive records. (One of the employees given access has reportedly since resigned over racist tweets.)

Feb. 5A second judge —Deborah L. Boardman of Maryland—blocked Trump’s policy rescinding birthright citizenship, in response to a lawsuit brought by nonprofits representing undocumented pregnant women.

Feb. 4Judge Royce C. Lamberth in D.C. paused Trump’s restrictions on transgender women being incarcerated in women’s prisons and federal prisons providing gender-affirming medical treatment, after multiple inmates sued to block the policy.

Feb. 3District Judge Loren L. Alikhan broadly blocked the Trump administration’s memo halting almost all federal assistance—even after the White House claimed it had been rescinded—while litigation brought by nonprofit groups that receive government funds moves forward.

Jan. 31The Trump administration’s memo pausing most federal assistance was partially blocked, as Judge John J. McConnell Jr. ruled the Trump administration cannot withhold funding from the Democratic-led states that sued to block the funding freeze.

Jan. 26O’Toole prohibited law enforcement from transferring an incarcerated transgender woman to a male prison facility—at least while litigation filed by the inmate moves forward—after Trump stripped transgender Americans of their legal protections, including being incarcerated at prisons aligned with their gender identities.

Jan. 23Coughenour paused Trump’s order rescinding birthright citizenship, the first major ruling against the second Trump administration.

Jan. 20The first lawsuit against Trump’s administration was filed minutes after he was sworn into office, as public interest law group National Security Counselors argued DOGE should be classified as a federal advisory board that has “fairly balanced” membership and follows public transparency rules. 

Lawsuits have been filed against a number of other Trump administration directives in cases that haven’t resulted in any rulings yet, including pending cases on Trump’s immigration policies like asylum restrictions, raids on sanctuary cities, immigration officers entering houses of worship, and restricting grants to immigration-related groups. Multiple other transgender rights-focused cases are pending, including litigation against Trump’s transgender military ban and minors receiving gender-affirming care, as well as a lawsuit challenging Trump’s broader restrictions on diversity, equity and inclusion policies. Other lawsuits that are still pending include litigation against the Justice Department targeting agents who worked on Jan. 6-related cases, Trump’s “Schedule F” that makes it easier to fire career civil servants, Trump’s firing of National Labor Relations Board member Gwynne A. Wilcox, the Office of Personnel Management allegedly storing emails on an unsecured server and the government removing health data from federal websites.

 Multiple lawsuits are also arguing Trump should not have been able to create Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” by renaming the U.S. Digital Service, while another challenge takes aim at DOGE accessing records at the Department of Labor.

None of the lawsuits against the second Trump administration have yet made it to the Supreme Court, though at least some inevitably will. The high stakes of the lawsuits brought against Trump policies, plus the fact that bringing multiple lawsuits against a single policy may result in conflicting rulings, makes it all but certain the high court will eventually weigh in on some of the legal challenges that are now making their way through the courts. It’s unclear how the 6-3 conservative court, stacked with three Trump appointees, will ultimately rule on any challenges, though legal experts have suggested some of the administration’s moves may be too much for even the conservative-leaning court to get behind. Georgetown Law School professor Stephen Vladeck wrote he was skeptical the Supreme Court would back the administration’s memo halting federal funding, for instance. He noted that while the court was willing to give Trump more power in its recent decision giving him some immunity from criminal charges, it would be “quite another” thing for them to give him “the right to refuse to spend any and all money Congress appropriates.” 

Legal experts have also been highly skeptical of the legal justification the Trump administration has used to justify the order nullifying birthright citizenship, which claims the 14th Amendment which guarantees citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” has always exempted the children of undocumented immigrants or non citizens. Mark Krikorian, who runs the Center for Immigration Studies and supports ending birthright citizenship, acknowledged to NBC News in July Trump’s argument is “something that the Supreme Court may well decide against,” and legal experts have previously decried the legal theory behind Trump’s order as a “lunatic fringe argument,” with University of Massachusetts, Amherst, professor Rebecca Hamlin telling NPR in 2018 that any lawyer who believes it is “like a unicorn.” 

Trump has already issued a number of major executive actions, and many have not yet been challenged in court, such as him pulling out of the World Health Organization, withholding federal funding from schools that allow transgender women in women’s sports, imposing tariffs on China, removing safeguards around artificial intelligence, and rescinding Biden-era climate change initiatives, including ordering federal agencies not to disburse some funding that was approved by Congress. Musk and DOGE have also undertaken a number of controversial moves that haven’t yet resulted in court action, including DOGE staffers accessing information for Medicare and Medicaid and reportedly using artificial intelligence to search through sensitive internal data for the Department of Education.

Trump has issued a slew of executive orders in the less than three weeks he’s been in the White House, issuing broad orders on issues such as climate change, transgender rights, DEI initiatives, education, immigration, the U.S. military, abortion, the federal death penalty and more. Musk, whom Trump appointed to lead DOGE and has become one of his top advisers, has also drawn widespread controversy as DOGE has burrowed into the federal government and gained access to government information while proposing widespread cuts to spending. With Republicans holding both the White House and control of Congress, the courts have become the primary way for Democrats to issue any sort of check on the Trump administration’s actions, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., has pointed to litigation as a key pillar of Democrats’ response to the second Trump presidency. “We’ve seen a flood and an avalanche of outrageous executive actions that have been taken by the administration and by the current president, but that has also prompted a response of righteous litigation,” Jeffries told MSNBC when asked how Democrats would oppose Trump’s policies, saying the litigation strategy “will continue as we move forward.”

Trump has already issued a number of major executive actions, and many have not yet been challenged in court, such as him pulling out of the World Health Organization, withholding federal funding from schools that allow transgender women in women’s sports, imposing tariffs on China, removing safeguards around artificial intelligence, and rescinding Biden-era climate change initiatives, including ordering federal agencies not to disburse some funding that was approved by Congress. Musk and DOGE have also undertaken a number of controversial moves that haven’t yet resulted in court action, including DOGE staffers accessing information for Medicare and Medicaid and reportedly using artificial intelligence to search through sensitive internal data for the Department of Education.

Trump has issued a slew of executive orders in the less than three weeks he’s been in the White House, issuing broad orders on issues such as climate change, transgender rights, DEI initiatives, education, immigration, the U.S. military, abortion, the federal death penalty and more. Musk, whom Trump appointed to lead DOGE and has become one of his top advisers, has also drawn widespread controversy as DOGE has burrowed into the federal government and gained access to government information while proposing widespread cuts to spending. With Republicans holding both the White House and control of Congress, the courts have become the primary way for Democrats to issue any sort of check on the Trump administration’s actions, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., has pointed to litigation as a key pillar of Democrats’ response to the second Trump presidency. “We’ve seen a flood and an avalanche of outrageous executive actions that have been taken by the administration and by the current president, but that has also prompted a response of righteous litigation,” Jeffries told MSNBC when asked how Democrats would oppose Trump’s policies, saying the litigation strategy “will continue as we move forward.”

RFK Jr.'s HHS votes are in!

Good news friends RFK Jr. clears key Senate committee, moving Trump's nominee to be the nation's top health official, moved closer toward confirmation Tuesday, with the Senate Finance Committee voting along party lines to send his controversial nomination to the full Senate. 

By a 14-13 vote, the committee voted to advance Kennedy, who has faced intense scrutiny over his past anti-vaccine statements and questions about how he would lead the Department of Health and Human Services. The key swing vote putting Kennedy over the edge was Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., a physician who fell in line with the Republican majority and voted for Kennedy despite raising reservations about Kennedy's position on vaccines.

#RFKJrConfirmation
How on earth did We The People allow “this thing” in our govt! 🤮🤮 Let’s Go RFK Jr! 👏🏻👏🏻🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/afPkA1g0ys

— july4thbaby (@TerriMorrison4) February 4, 2025

Cassidy, who is up for reelection in 2026, announced his support shortly before the vote in a post on X, saying he had "very intense conversations" with Kennedy and The White House over the weekend. "With the serious commitments I’ve received from the administration and the opportunity to make progress on the issues we agree on like healthy foods and a pro-American agenda, I will vote yes," Cassidy said. 

The vote came after Kennedy was grilled by Democrats during two days of committee hearings last week. He struggled to account for past statements he made questioning vaccines and conspiracy theories he's pushed and stumbled over questions about Medicare and Medicaid. Democrats continued on the attack saying “I simply do not trust him to oversee the CDC,” Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., “He’s unqualified, and I dare say everybody here knows it.”

Outside of Trump's Defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, Republican senators have stayed united behind the president's Cabinet picks, but Kennedy's nomination as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services has presented the biggest test yet. It's unclear whether Kennedy has the votes for passage in the Senate, but at least four Republican senators would likely have to vote against Kennedy for his nomination to fail given Republican's 53-47 majority.

Ranking member Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon said Democrats are not done trying to block Kennedy’s confirmation, despite Tuesday’s notable setback. “This fight is going to go on. And I’m going to pull out all the stops,” Wyden said, without elaborating what those stops are and acknowledging that Republicans have been reticent to alienate themselves from Trump over his Cabinet nominees.

“Obviously it is a challenging political time,” Wyden said, but, “the fight is not over. We can continue this on the floor of the Senate." Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., a polio survivor, has raised concerns over Kennedy's position on vaccines. And Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine have showed a willingness to buck Trump when it comes to his nominees when they voted against the Hegseth pick. 

Yet even if all three were to vote against Kennedy's nomination, Vice President JD Vance would be in position to cast a tie-breaking vote, like he did with Hegseth, if at least one more Republican senator didn't also vote against Kennedy. Kennedy's fate in the Finance Committee came down to Cassidy, R-La., a physician, who had talked openly about being torn over Kennedy because of his views on vaccines. 

But the vote also posed tough political considerations for Cassidy, who has already drawn a Republican primary challenger in 2026 after voting to convict Trump during the president's second impeachment in 2021. "I've been struggling with your nomination," Cassidy bluntly told Kennedy during last week's hearings. "Does a 71-year old man who spent decades criticizing vaccines and was financially vested in finding fault with vaccines, can he change his attitudes and approach now that he'll have the most important position influencing vaccine policy in the United States?" 

Democrats have attacked Kennedy for a trail of controversial past statements including casting doubt about vaccines, comparing the CDC's work to "Nazi death camps," saying it "highly likely" Lyme disease was a military bioweapon and concerns about antidepressants. 

BREAKING: The stocks of both vaccine manufacturers, Pfizer and Moderna, immediately crashed after RFK Jr.'s nomination advanced toward the Senate. pic.twitter.com/L1o28ipxrl

— The General (@GeneralMCNews) February 4, 2025