GE Appliances moves some production from China to Kentucky with $490M investment

Well looks like things are working well in the tariffs area as "GE" Appliances announced a nearly half-billion-dollar project. They said that it will create 800 new jobs and shift production of clothes washers from China to its massive manufacturing complex in Kentucky. The $490 million investment positions the Kentucky home appliances company to rank as the biggest U.S. manufacturer of washing machines, it said. “We are bringing laundry production to our global headquarters in Louisville because manufacturing in the U.S. is fundamental to our ‘zero-distance’ business strategy to make appliances as close as possible to our customers and consumers,” CEO Kevin Nolan said. “This decision is our most recent product re-shoring and aligns with the current economic and policy environment.”

The announcement comes as President Donald Trump attempts to lure factories back to the United States by imposing import taxes tariffs on foreign goods. He has slapped 10% tariffs on imports from most countries and put 30% levies on Chinese goods. GE Appliances says nearly all the steel used in its U.S. manufacturing for its appliances comes from American steelmakers. GE Appliances said the project will move production of a combo washer/dryer and a lineup of front load washers from China to the Bluegrass State. In all, production of more than 15 models of front load washers will shift to the company's sprawling Louisville production complex known as Appliance Park, it said. Once the added production is in place, the total area devoted to clothes care production at the Louisville complex will equal 33 football fields, it said.

Kentucky Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear, who has criticized Trump's tariffs, hailed the company's deepening commitment to the state. “Today's announcement brings more appliance manufacturing back to the United States and solidifies Kentucky and Louisville as the global headquarters of GE Appliances,” the governor said. The redesigned factory will become its most advanced manufacturing plant for clothes washing production, the company said, featuring the latest in automation, robotics and material-handling technologies including automated guided vehicles and autonomous mobile robots.

The new manufacturing lines will open in 2027, the company said. Next door at the complex's Building 1, the company produces top load washers and front load dryers. GE Appliances handles product design and engineering work at its Louisville headquarters but lacks overall production capacity to make all of its products at its U.S. plants. So it contracts with other manufacturers, including in China, for some of its production. The company said its core business strategy is to base production in the United States, and the investment announced Thursday is another step toward achieving that goal.

“Manufacturing in Louisville puts production closer to our designers, engineers and consumers so that together we can create our most innovative laundry platforms,” said Lee Lagomarcino, vice president of clothes care at GE Appliances. The $490 million infusion into Appliance Park is the latest round of investments in recent years as part of the company’s growth strategy. It builds on the company's previous investments of $3.5 billion in U.S. manufacturing in the past decade, with more than one-third of the amount going to Appliance Park.

Appliance Park in Louisville employs about 8,000 workers and is home to five plants that produce washers, dryers, dishwashers and refrigerators as well as parts and components. GE Appliances also has manufacturing plants in South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee and Connecticut.

GE Appliances is a subsidiary of the China-based Haier company. This is also something we should look into as they still have ties to CHINA and it could always be seen as a potential issue. So I'd go a step further I'd make them sell the company to AMERICAN investors before letting them do anymore bussiness in THE USA.

President Trump issues warning to Fraud Squad head AOC after impeachment push

Ok so our President Donald Trump called out the village idiot Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) to try impeaching him, and said the democratic socialist should be more focused on keeping hold of her seat instead. Ocasio-Cortez, also known as AOC, had said Trump's ordering of strikes on Iran without congressional approval was grounds for his impeachment. She forgets that well Trump is not the only President to do this but the's an complete fail so she needed to be reminded that "She better start worrying about her own Primary, before she thinks about beating our Great Palestinian Senator, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, whose career is definitely on very thin ice!" Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

"She and her Democrat friends have just hit the Lowest Poll Numbers in Congressional History, so go ahead and try Impeaching me, again, MAKE MY DAY!" Trump told our favorite big booty Latina! And AOC fired back at Trump on X, on Tuesday afternoon saying, "Mr. President, don't take your anger out on me I'm just a silly girl. Take it out on whoever convinced you to betray the American people and our Constitution by illegally bombing Iran and dragging us into war. It only took you 5 months to break almost every promise you made." See this is how these con-women in congress do! They talk trash, lie, and talk bad about TRUMP ALL DAY! The moment that he says anything they're on "Victim" mode and act like he's the badguy. LOL They think we still fall for this con.

But anyway Saturday, the president announced strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan in response to the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, a U.S. ally. On June 13, Israel struck Tehran, Iran's capital, and other cities to disrupt its nuclear capabilities, and Iran retaliated with strikes of its own, the majority of which were intercepted by Israeli defense systems. Just in the past 24 hours, a U.S.-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Iran was announced by President Trump, following a 12-day conflict marked by U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites and Iranian missile attacks on Israel and a U.S. base in Qatar. Despite the ceasefire, both nations have accused each other of violations, with continued missile exchanges and airstrikes casting doubt on the truce's stability.

The U.S. House voted decisively Tuesday to halt an attempt to impeach President Trump on a single charge of abuse of power, stemming from his decision to launch military strikes on Iran without prior congressional approval. The unexpected move, initiated by caveman look alike and moron Rep. Al Green of Texas, a Democrat, who is mindless, and looks like he hasn't showered in months! But somehow he sparked minimal debate but revealed divisions within his party which is good as not many even on his side think this will work. While most Democrats sided with Republicans to table the resolution, dozens supported Green's push. The final vote was 344-79.

Democrats have been split on Trump's response since Saturday's strikes. AOC said this weekend's attack was "disastrous," writing on X, that it was "a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers." LOL Yeah "Disastrous" to IRAN Nuke plans! So AOC pipe down please your low IQ is just mind blowing at how you got in that seat you take up... Someone has to answer how much they paid to get you there because it wasn't due to how smart you are. This idiot said on X, "The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers. He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment." 

Yeah no it's not AOC and you didn't say a thing when Biden did it or Obama did it. Well you might have still been a Bar Tender and Stripper when Obama did it. But Khanna, along with Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, introduced a bipartisan War Powers Resolution last Tuesday in a bid to curb Trump's ability to escalate tensions with Iran.

Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, also ripped Trump on X, writing that he "struck Iran without any authorization of Congress. We need to immediately return to DC and vote on @RepThomasMassie and my War Powers Resolution to prevent America from being dragged into another endless Middle East war." Massie, a longtime thorn in the president's side, and Trump continue to trade barbs on social media over his use of military action. Senator John Fetterman, a Pennsylvania Democrat, came to Trump's side and wrote on X, "As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS. Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities. I'm grateful for and salute the finest military in the world." 

This is not shocking as John Fetterman has been a strong supporter of Israel amid the ongoing war in Gaza and has recently called for the U.S. to provide the country with weaponry, intelligence and military assistance to strike Iran. What People Are Saying Green said ahead of Tuesday's vote, "I take no delight in what I'm doing. I do this because no one person should have the power to take over 300 million people to walk without consulting with the Congress of the United States of America. I do this because I understand that the Constitution is going to be meaningful or it's going to be meaningless."

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican from Georgia, also criticized Ocasio-Cortez, writing on X on Saturday: "Shut up you pathetic little hypocrite. YOU fully supported our military and IC running the proxy war against Russia in Ukraine. And you VOTED to fund the Ukraine war under your President with dementia. You don't get to play anti-war and moral outrage anymore." To which here we say THIS YOU MTG! We needed someone to call AOC that way and House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, said Tuesday: "Many respected constitutional experts argue that the War Powers Act is itself unconstitutional. I'm persuaded by that argument. They think it's a violation of the Article 2 powers of the commander in chief. I think that's right."

Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota reposted a video of Johnson's remarks on X, and said, "Imagine being in Congress and arguing against Congressional authority. They're ready to throw away their own war powers just so Trump can bomb whoever he wants with zero oversight. We've truly lost the plot." What we think is someone needs to stick a WMD up her tight asshole. 

This moron can't be deported? Why?

AOC downplays LA riots as mere 'teens' throwing rocks!

AOC "Squad" Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has not just lied many times in the past but now this moron is downplaying the recent riots in Los Angeles, attributing the chaos to unruly teens not violent anarchists and blaming President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown for the unrest. This Fraud Squad lunatic AOC took to the social media platform Bluesky on Tuesday and said Democrats don’t need to "answer for every teen who throws a rock" and that her party was falling into a Republican trap by trying to explain why parts of the sanctuary city had gone up in flames. 

AOC instead blamed President Trump for the chaotic scenes that have resulted in property being burned and rocks and Molotov cocktails thrown at law enforcement as some agitators waved Mexican flags. The ugly scenes that kicked off on Friday prompted Trump to deploy the National Guard and the U.S. Marines. "It is 100% carrying water for the opposition to participate in this collective delusion that Dems for some reason need to answer for every teen who throws a rock rather than hold the Trump admin accountable for intentionally creating chaos and breaking the law to stoke violence," Ocasio-Cortez wrote. 

"They are in charge." Rioters have been seen throwing rocks on police cars and at police, while one violent individual was caught on video pelting several moving law enforcement vehicles in Paramount, California, as they drove past him. He was identified as Elpidio Reyna, and an image of Reyna released by U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli clearly shows he is an adult. He is still at large, and the FBI initially offered a $50,000 cash reward for information leading to his arrest. In a second post, Ocasio-Cortez blamed Trump for the unrest, writing that his decision to send Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) out to apprehend illegal migrants triggered the response in Los Angeles. 

Trump swept to victory in November, promising to carry out the largest deportation effort in U.S. history, and arrested more than 66,000 people and deported approximately 65,000 in the first 100 days of his second presidency. "Everything was fine until Trump decided to unleash violent raids w/o grounds in elementary schools, shopping areas, & peaceful public spaces. ICE then illegally blocked Members of Congress entry into the facilities they are disappearing people into, escalating the situation," Ocasio-Cortez wrote, referring to members of Congress recently turning up at a New Jersey ICE detention center unannounced. 

"Let’s start there," Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Bluesky, a competitor to X. She did not post her comments to X and instead shared the Bluesky posts to her Instagram stories. Meanwhile, the Department of Homeland Security on Wednesday announced that ICE arrested a previously deported illegal immigrant from Mexico after he allegedly threw a Molotov cocktail at law enforcement amid rioting in Los Angeles on Saturday. He has been charged with attempted murder. Rioters have also set off fireworks at police officers and vehicles, vandalized property with graffiti, looted businesses and smashed windows of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) headquarters. 

California Gov. Gavin Newson and LA Mayor Karen Bass have also tried to pin the blame on Trump. The president and his allies, meanwhile, maintain that he acted boldly and that the situation would have escalated further had he not done so. "If our troops didn’t go into Los Angeles, it would be burning to the ground right now, just like so much of their housing burned to the ground," Trump posted to Truth Social on Wednesday morning. 

"The great people of Los Angeles are very lucky that I made the decision to go in and help! The view once again gas lighting the issue, and lying! They have no issues with the rules until it's TRUMP using them if he does it's HITLER all over again. Gov. Gavin Newscum is being mocked online for an “embarrassing" televised address that experienced several technology meltdowns leaving his speech without sound.

These women are con artists, and should all be fired.

Trump calls Russian President Vladimir Putin crazy!

So in a turn that even the left media are having a hard time putting into words since it takes away their hoax that Trump and Putin are the best of friends The Kremlin responded Monday to President Trump’s criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin” Why? Well cause Trump called Putin "CRAZY!" And well we can all agree he's "crazy" there is no doubt there, and also a power driven KGB loving dictator. So our President isn't lying but the hilarious reply was that they're citing “emotional overload” at this “very important moment." This folks is hilarious!

But let's continue here "We are really grateful to the Americans and to President Trump personally for their assistance in organizing and launching this negotiation process,” said Russian spokesperson Dmitry Peskov when asked about Trump’s remarks, according to Reuters. “Of course, at the same time, this is a very crucial moment, which is associated, of course, with the emotional overload of everyone absolutely and with emotional reactions.” The comments come after Trump lashed out at Putin in recent days, a noticeable shift in tone that many have interpreted as a sign Trump is losing his patience with the Russian leader amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.

“I’ve always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!” Trump wrote Sunday night on Truth Social. At this point I think I should remind what happened last Trump term when these "CRAZY" dictator or terrorist decided to F' Around... They Found Out.

Exhibit A & B

Earlier that day, the president said he was “not happy” with his Russian counterpart as he prepared to board Air Force One. “I don’t know what the hell happened to Putin,” Trump told reporters. Russia overnight launched a record number of drones into Ukraine, along with nine cruise missiles, according to The Associated Press. No deaths were immediately confirmed. The attack followed a similar onslaught Saturday, when the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv came under fire from a barrage of Russian drones and missiles, killing at least 12 people. Trump has repeatedly vowed to end the conflict, the current phase of which began when Moscow invaded Ukraine in February 2022. 

The president’s comments are some of his toughest yet directed at Putin, though Trump has also ratcheted up his criticism of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. “Likewise, President Zelenskyy is doing his Country no favors by talking the way he does,” Trump said in his remarks Sunday before boarding Air Force One.

VP Vance tells Biden his foreign policy was a 'total disaster'

Vance fires back at Biden's criticism, calls his foreign policy a 'total disaster' and tells Fox News' Martha MacCallum he sees progress in Ukraine talks and global trade negotiations. Almost feels like something out of "The Phantom Menace" doesn't it? BRING IN THE DROIDS!!!

Vice President JD Vance also had something to say in reply at Joe Biden's criticism of the now infamous Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, dismissing the former commander-in-chief's foreign policy this is when he said about Biden that his policy was a "total disaster." He continued saying that "I think it's rich for Joe Biden to comment on anything that we’re doing when it comes to Russia and Ukraine," said Vance told Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum Thursday on "The Story." "Under Biden’s administration, Russia launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine…I wish Joe Biden the best. I don't really care what he has to say about American foreign policy because so much of what he actually did was a total disaster."

In an interview with the BBC earlier this week his first since leaving office in January Biden called the President Donald Trump-Vance meeting with Zelenskyy "beneath America." And we all in America who are not communists libertarded morons hope the entire Biden crime family ends up under a prison in America. Maybe in Alkatraz? Hey Hunter can smoke rocks there with the Salad Tossing man.

"We obviously want Ukraine to remain a sovereign country," he said. "We knew that the Russians' first offer would be too much. We knew that they would ask for more than was reasonable to give. That's how negotiations often work. I'm not bothered by that." What the left wants is for us to either keep sending our Money for more people keep fighting, and the WAR continues and Peace is never had and we lose more Money here, and well they want to cause global destruction from the looks of it. But as Vance said "What would bother me is if we conclude that the Russians are not engaging in the negotiation in good faith. And if that happens, yeah, we're [going to] walk away," said Vance.

Despite a recent rejection of a ceasefire proposal by Russia, Vance struck a cautiously optimistic tone about the direction of peace talks. "I actually think it’s progress that they’re even talking," he said. "We’re putting concrete peace plans on the table." Vance also addressed developments in global trade, touting the administration’s first formal tariff agreement reached with the United Kingdom. Earlier this year, the Trump administration imposed a 10% reciprocal tariff on U.K. imports, and additional tariffs on global products like steel and vehicles.'

"Because of our long time history and allegiance together, it is a great honor to have the United Kingdom as our FIRST announcement," Trump wrote on TRUTH Social. "Many other deals, which are in serious stages of negotiation, to follow! Vance said the U.K. was chosen first because of its openness and strong relationship with the current administration. As for China, which retaliated with steep tariffs of its own, Vance acknowledged the difficulty of rebalancing global trade but said the administration remains committed.

"We’re [going to] have a conversation with them. We’ll see where it leads," he said. "We just [want a] deal with any country, whether it's China or anybody else that makes American workers and American businesses in a better position," Vance continued by saying he felt that goal was "very achievable."

Turning to domestic issues, VP Vance discussed ongoing efforts under DOGE, even as its leader Elon Musk steps back from day-to-day involvement. "Elon’s not disappearing," Vance said. "Nobody said that the work of DOGE would only last 110 days and that would be it…We think there’s a lot more waste and fraud that we can find." He confirmed that Attorney General Pam Bondi is preparing investigations into potential large-scale fraud and that lawsuits could follow. "I know that she's working on building the case against some of these people who have committed absolute fraud on the American people. You're [going to] see some of those prosecutions over the next few years."

When asked about rumored tension between himself and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, both of whom have been floated as potential Trump successors, Vance dismissed the idea. "Marco's actually my probably my best friend in the administration," he said. "We hang out and talk all the time. He's doing a really good job. And, of course, I'm doing the best job that I can." Still, Vance didn’t rule out a run for the presidency in 2028. "I can see myself doing a really good job for the next 1,100 days, and then the American people can figure it out from there," he said.

Trump to build national center for homeless veterans with funds previously spent on housing illegal aliens

So money being used for Illegals huh? Well no more! As President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order to establish a national center for homeless veterans with redirected funds previously spent on services for illegal aliens, Fox News Digital has learned. The president’s order directs the secretary of veterans affairs to establish the National Center for Warrior Independence on the Veterans Affairs campus in West Los Angeles. Los Angeles has approximately 3,000 homeless veterans more than any other city in the country, and accounting for about 10% of all homeless veterans in America, according to the White House.

"The new National Center for Warrior Independence will help them and other veterans like them rebuild their lives," the White House said. The center will allow veterans from around the nation to seek and receive care, benefits and services "to which they are entitled," the White House said. The order redirects funds previously spent on housing or other services for illegal aliens to constructing, establishing and maintaining the new center. "The Center will promote self-sufficiency through housing, substance abuse treatment, and support for productive work for the veterans housed there," the White House explained.

It said the goal is to house up to 6,000 homeless veterans at the center by 2028. The order also directs the secretary of housing and urban development to use vouchers to support homeless veterans and instructs the secretary of veterans affairs to "restore accountability at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)."

The order also instructs the VA to take action against individuals who have committed misconduct and to investigate and rectify the Biden administration’s decision to "rehire and reinstate back pay for employees previously fired for misconduct." The order also ensures that veterans will have access to increased options for care, benefits and services including reduced wait times for Veterans Health Administration appointments through options such as expanded hours, weekend appointments and virtual healthcare.

The order also directs a feasibility study at the Manchester VA Medical Center to expand services to support a full-service medical center in New Hampshire.

"President Trump strongly believes that every veteran deserves our gratitude, and that the federal government should treat veterans like the heroes they are," the White House said. The order comes a week after the White House announced that Trump will host a military parade on June 14 to honor military veterans and active-duty service members and commemorate the U.S. Army’s 250th birthday.

District Judge Edgardo Ramos blocked canceling more than $1 billion in funding on COVID-19 pandemic!

Shocking I know but yet Another NY liberal radical federal judge on May 6 blocked the U.S. Department of Education from canceling more than $1 billion in funding that was allocated to help address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary schools and students. This is becoming comical folks but the U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos entered a preliminary injunction that prohibits the Department of Education from enforcing its rescission of extensions for the funding that had been granted in January by the prior administration. Education officials also cannot modify the previously-approved extensions without giving the states at least 14 days notice, the judge said. The Congress allocated funds to states to distribute to schools to address problems stemming from the pandemic. The more than $276 billion was distributed to states through an education stabilization fund. Under laws passed by Congress, states had until Sept. 30, 2024, to designate the money, and until Jan. 28, 2025, to access funds to achieve the designations.

The States could ask for extensions for the latter deadline, and a number did so. The Department of Education granted extensions to at least 16 states, and Washington, enabling them to access the money through March 2026. Education Secretary Linda McMahon informed the states in March that the extensions were being rescinded because additional review had determined they were “not justified” in part because the pandemic is over, although the states could reapply for extensions. The Covid PANDEMIC IS OVER! We don't need more wasted money which we all know is being used for things NOT related to Covid. We all know in reality this is just finding it's way into the pockets of crooks in congress on lets say the LEFT Radical side.

The plaintiffs "New York, Oregon, 13 other states, Washington", and Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro said that they were facing being cut off from more than $1 billion if a preliminary injunction was not entered. Notice again the places all trying to stop this from being taken away? All liberal radical blue states who love to waste our time, and money with their idiotic b/s. But In a memorandum in support of their motion for an injunction, they said that the Department of Education’s shift with regards to the extension requests was arbitrary and capricious, in violation of federal law. The change “assumes incorrectly that all [the] appropriations were intended only for use during the pandemic” and “lacks any reasoned explanation,” they wrote on which I say AHA? Now like I said this money wasn't going where they claimed... All going into the pockets of these liberals.

The Lawyers for the government said in response that the actions were not arbitrary and capricious. “The Department’s actions are not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law because recession of the prior extension was within the Department’s discretion and did not conflict with the relevant appropriations statutes,” they said in a brief. Also the lawyers said that the plaintiffs would not be irreparably harmed absent an injunction because they can still reapply for a fresh extension, but have chosen not to do so. The Department of Justice, which represents agencies in court, did not respond to a request for comment on the ruling by publication time. New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, said in a statement that “this is a major win for our students and teachers who are counting on this funding to help them succeed.” Like I said look who is on there in a "QUOTE" the one and only!

Federal judge orders Trump admin to immediately resettle 12K migrants?

So another Radical Biden-appointed federal judge ordered Trump admin to begin processing refugees within next 7 days and so U.S. District Judge Jamal Shithead or Whitehead whatever on Monday he ordered the Trump administration to immediately resettle some 12,000 refugees into the U.S. under a court order that partially blocks President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at halting the refugee admissions program.

Jamal the Shithead, a 2023 appointee of former Con Artist and fake President Joe Biden, issued the order despite the Trump administration saying during a hearing last week that it should only have to process 160 refugees into the country and would likely appeal any order requiring thousands to be admitted. "This Court will not entertain the Government’s result-oriented rewriting of a judicial order that clearly says what it says," Whitehead wrote on Monday.

"The Government is free, of course, to seek further clarification from the Ninth Circuit. But the Government is not free to disobey statutory and constitutional law and the direct orders of this Court and the Ninth Circuit while it seeks such clarification." Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office suspending refugee resettlement and ordering the Department of Homeland Security to report back in 90 days on whether resuming resettlement would be in the interests of the U.S. In February, Whitehead blocked the Trump administration’s move to suspend refugee admissions into the U.S. in response to a lawsuit from refugee aid groups. 

So Whitehead said at the time that Trump’s actions were an "effective nullification of congressional will" in setting up the nation’s refugee admissions program. Whitehead ordered the Trump administration within the next seven days to resume processing the cases of refugees who are protected by the court order. The federal judge also told the government to immediately take steps to facilitate admission to the U.S. for those refugees whose clearances, including medical and security authorizations, have not yet lapsed.

Doge cuts $361,000 that went toward towards 'BIPOC' (Black, Indigenous, and people of color) and other wasted money!

Boy the alphabet people and their liberal congress butt buddies are not going to like this but it looks like the team Dodge did it again friends. Turns out that the USDA got rid of 420 grants for a savings of $2.3 billion, according to DOGE. Among the programs the money was used for, $361,000 went toward "gender non-conforming, non-binary, two-spirit" BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and people of color) farmers in New York. We kid you not and if you are not clear as to what these people are getting paid to produce neither does anyone else. 

In a post on X, the Elon Musk-led group said it got rid of the contracts, which have a ceiling value of $250 million and a savings of $70 million. The problem contracts included a $14,000 commitment by the Department of Health and Human Services for an "executive transformational leadership training program." Another was a $5.2 million contract with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, the human resources agency for the federal government, to "provide strategic advisory and assistance to improve and transform current processes and organizational systems".

DOGE recently announced $51 million in cuts from the U.S. African Development Foundation, which included hundreds of thousands of dollars for marketing shea butter and pineapple juice, as well as mango drying facilities. The group was created in an effort to slash government waste and provide additional transparency in government spending. It recently helped the U.S. Coast Guard save $32.7 million by eliminating an "ineffective IT program" known as the Logistics Information Management System.

Americans recently shared mixed reviews of the transparency group. Fox News Digital conducted interviews in Knoxville, Tennessee; Washington, D.C.; Detroit; and Houston, where citizens provided reactions and graded its ongoing efforts. Some criticized DOGE for "trying to do their job with a sledgehammer," while others praised the group for looking into government waste. Nearly half of all layoffs so far in 2025 have been driven by cuts related to the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) efforts to slash government funding and reduce the size of the federal workforce, according to a new report from outplacement firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas.

The report shows that “DOGE Actions” led to 283,172 job cuts in the first four months of 2025, and “DOGE Downstream Impact” was cited as the reason for another 6,945 job losses, which the report indicates largely come from non-profits and education organizations. Together, that accounts for 48 percent of all job cuts announced so far this year. The vast majority of job cuts related to “DOGE Actions” occurred in March, which saw 216,670 positions cut. Government job cuts last month also accounted for the vast majority of layoffs across all sectors, which totaled 275,240 in March. In April, job cuts attributed to DOGE plummeted, with just 2,919 announced cuts attributed to the government cost-cutting initiative spearheaded by tech billionaire Elon Musk.

But April still saw a high number of job cuts — 105,441 — the highest level since April 2020, which was the highest month ever recorded by the outplacement firm, which began reporting on job cuts in 1989. Reasons given for April cuts include “Market/Economic Conditions” and tariffs and restructuring. “Though the Government cuts are front and center, we saw job cuts across sectors last month. Generally, companies are citing the economy and new technology,” said Andrew Challenger, the firm’s senior vice president. “Employers are slow to hire and limiting hiring plans as they wait and see what will happen with trade, supply chain, and consumer spending.” Gross domestic product shrank during the first quarter of 2025 as a surge of imports ahead of President Trump’s tariffs, which he announced in March and later delayed for 90 days, hit economic growth calculations.

Trump-Appointed Federal Judge Fernando Rodriguez Blocks Use Of Alien Enemies Act To Deport Venezuelans

Who Is Judge Fernando Rodriguez? The Trump-Appointed Federal Judge who just Blocked the use Of Alien Enemies Act To Deport Venezuelans to their home country even when they're not citizens here but of Venezuela, and are here illegally. Now while he was selected on September 7, 2017 by President Donald Trump when he was nominated. Judge Rodriguez has served as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, to the seat vacated by Judge Gregg Costa, who was elevated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on May 20, 2014. On November 29, 2017, a hearing was held on his nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee. On January 11, 2018, his nomination was reported out of committee by a voice vote.

On June 5, 2018, the United States Senate invoked cloture on his nomination by a 94–1 vote. Later that day, Rodriguez was confirmed by a 96–0 vote. He received his judicial commission on June 12, 2018. He has since been used sadly by the left to help them and has shown his true RINO colors, and this is just more proof of it. This was one of the reasons why these people have done this unlawful moves in the court as a lot of these judges have been compromised and clearly don't care about our Rule of law or what the people want. 

We voted for this but these rogue judges keep trying to stop it, and stick up for known criminals. Now one reason I think the Judge is aimed this towards Venezuelans and not say El Salvador or other countries where people are being deported too is due to them not being known locations where MS-13 originated out of as it's documented they came out of El Salvador, Mexico mostly but the part which leaves us with a major WTF moment is that Venezuela has a communist leadership, and they don't want to play ball with us on these deportations also Tren de Aragua is a transnational criminal organization from Venezuela.

Tren de Aragua is led by Héctor Rusthenford Guerrero Flores, alias "Niño Guerrero ... And these people are as bad as MS-13 and are again considered terrorists. SO The fact that this judge wants to help people here who have ties to "Tren de Aragua" is shocking and shows the level of either ignorance or criminal mentality by these Judges. 

Let's also keep in mind that recently in Texas Judges have been getting busted helping illegals and even been arrested for it. So this is starting to smell like something which could be tied into the Fort Pen County Judge KP George who was arrested and charged with money laundering between 30 and $150,000.

The Southern District of Texas, where Rodriguez would serve, encompasses such cities as Houston, Galveston, Corpus Christi, and Laredo. Rodriguez was born in this district in 1969, in Harlingen, a city near the Mexican border. After graduating from Yale University in 1991, he spent several years with Teach For America, teaching at an inner-city school in Houston. In 1997, he graduated from the University of Texas at Austin School of Law, and went on to become a partner in the Dallas office of Baker Botts. Since 2010, he has worked for the International Justice Mission, a nonprofit Christian organization focused on combating human trafficking.

He is a Mexican decedent who was born in America out of all things he's an anchor baby himself and the Judge was brought to Trump to nominate because most of his nominations had been "white" at the time and so the party wanted this guy because he was of Mexican roots. Who in the GOP wanted him you ask? The Rinos at the time pushed him on Trump during his first term back in 2017 so when he took his nomination like he accepted Mike Pence, and others based on the party saying these people should be his nominations and recommended them to Trump he picked them as he was new to politics, and was set up by these bad actors in the GOP who wanted to help the left make sure TRUMP was a failed administration and this did not work out as the American people can now see thru this. So while this looks bad look at the facts of who this shitbag Judge is and why he did this against Trump. This doesn't shock when another activist leftist leaning Judge comes out and does something nobody asked him to do and get in the way of sending illegal criminals back home who got here illegally.

He's working against the people of Texas, and should resign as he clearly doesn't care about the people in Texas who are suffering due to the illegal overload, and even the Gov, and others there are on Trump side on this point in history. Rodriguez was born in this district in 1969, in Harlingen, a city near the Mexican border. After graduating from Yale University in 1991, he spent several years with Teach For America, teaching at an inner-city school in Houston. In 1997, he graduated from the University of Texas at Austin School of Law, and went on to become a partner in the Dallas office of Baker Botts. Since 2010, he has worked for the International Justice Mission, a nonprofit Christian organization focused on combating human trafficking.

Benny Agosto Jr. (Democrat Mexican American), partner at Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto, and Aziz in Houston, told NBC that “Rodriguez has a great pedigree. He has the eastern education but also he is someone who has been through different life experiences, that maybe some big-city folks have not.” Agosto believes that Rodriguez’ experience will translate into a successful judicial career. “He has a big-firm work ethic, and based on my personal vetting, he is well-respected.”

“He is a really smart lawyer,” said Tim Durst (Democrat leadning independent), partner-in-charge at the Dallas office of Baker Botts. “Fernando was a wonderful colleague who was used to dealing with complicated, sophisticated issues. He brought a lot to the table, and he was a great teammate.” At Baker Botts, Rodriguez worked on corporate commercial litigation cases, representing a steel supplier in a federal breach of contract case, and defending a Costa Rica partnership in a breach of contract claim over the building of a hospital.

This is why these people got away with them 2 fame impeachments of Trump during his first term, and are now acting as roadblocks on deporting illegal Aliens back to their home country where they are CITIZENS off. This is called treason behavior and it's time for them to resign immediately as they are acting against the will of the people of this country. This is what we voted for in a majority for Trump and these Rogue activist Judges of Latino or Democratic party tools are hell bent on causing chaos and ruling against the will of the people at all cost. They really believe they are not just keeps of our laws but above it. This folks is communism. But what can we expect from a bunch of communist pigs but grunts.

Democrat Rep. Shri Thanedar introduced seven articles of impeachments OF President Donald Trump

Now anyone who knows me knows I've been saying this for a long time that there is a major section in the country from India that is behind a lot of the lawlessness, and the overall attempt to take over this country. Even at a presidential level the person who lost to Donald Trump one Kamala Harris is from India background born to parents born in Jamaica but both again from INDIAN families, and both families of hers have once long back been "SLAVE OWNERS" ... These facts have been suppressed by the main stream over her time as VP due to the MSM doing their role in this coup of the country by these communists who are trying to destroy us from the inside.

IF You notice in the congress, and senate on almost every level now the liberal left is stacked with people who are not from this country or from Indian, Muslim or communists countries, and those who are not have bent knee to these people because yes folks they're making MILLIONS from selling out this country. We the people spoke loud when we elected Donald Trump last November back into office as this sort of inside JOB they were enacting under the Biden/Harris/Obama coup was finally being seen by so many people that the election was to big to rig. We won the Senate, House, and White House. Mid terms coming up soon and we must keep kicking these leftists out... One name we all need to include is Indian born Democrat Rep. Shri Thanedar who is another insane liberal and he just introduced seven articles of impeachment OF President Trump.

The Indian-born Democrat is accusing Trump of obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and other accusations. "Donald Trump has already done real damage to our democracy, but defying a unanimous Supreme Court ruling, That has to be the final straw." Now check out the video below folks, and no TRUMP didn't defy the court ruling he just did the right chess move, and beat the game so these people are upset. So watch this unhinged lunatic on video. Remember Trump got impeached 7 times during his first term and 2 went all the way past the first level so President Donald Trump was impeached twice during his single term in office. In each case, he was acquitted on all counts by the Senate.

Now we had someone from the left come forward and address this and well it looks like much like the party this is a DEAD ISSUE... The chair of the House Democratic Caucus on Tuesday rejected the efforts in the party to impeach President Trump. Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) did not go so far as to say that Trump has not committed impeachable offenses in his first 100 days back in office. But with Republicans controlling both the House and the Senate, Aguilar suggested the move is simply impractical. “Impeachment is, at times, a tool that can be used. This president is no stranger to that; he’s been impeached twice,” Aguilar told reporters in the Capitol. “But we don’t have any confidence that House and Senate Republicans would do their jobs. And so this is not an exercise that we’re willing to undertake.”

A day earlier, Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) filed seven articles of impeachment against Trump for actions he’s taken since January, including the wrongful deportation of a Maryland man to El Salvador and efforts to slash government spending without congressional approval. Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), another sharp Trump critic who looks like a caveman and someone who has never heard of things like a shower, has said he also plans to file impeachment articles at some point. The impeachment talk has ramped up amid liberal criticisms that Capitol Hill Democrats haven’t been aggressive enough in combating Trump in the early months of his second term. Democratic leaders, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), have rejected that characterization, pointing to a host of actions from field hearings and rallies, to sit-ins and town halls in GOP districts that Democrats have conducted to get their message out to voters.

“And we’re going to continue to show up, stand up and speak up in a variety of ways inside the Capitol, outside the Capitol, on the Capitol steps, in Democratic districts and Republican districts and throughout America,” Jeffries said Monday. Yet all these efforts to take down a President when people in actual need of help for disabilities, and other help that these people could spend their time working on they rather spend our tax payer money on this garbage. Then these liberals wonder why they have lost the voters? Why we voted in a RED WAVE in November? But Aguilar on Tuesday offered a similar message, saying Democrats will focus their energies on highlighting the unpopular elements of Trump’s policy agenda including Medicaid cuts and tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans rather than impeachment. Which is the right thing for them to do.

“Right now, we will deal with the tools in front of us,” Aguilar said. “The policies that he and House Republicans have placed forward which are reckless cuts to the health care system, to our supplemental nutrition that is relied on by women and children and families across this country those are the policies that we’re going to push back against. “And those are the items that the American public is paying attention to.” Let's hope that there is some sanity left in the decaying party known as the Democratic Party. But let's take a look back at how the past impeachments of Trump went.

The first impeachment trial stemmed from a call President Trump had with the President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine in which President Trump asked the Ukrainian President to announce two investigations: one involving his potential opponent in the upcoming 2020 presidential election and a second into unsubstantiated allegations that entities within Ukraine had interfered in the 2016 presidential election.1 At the time of the call, the Office of Management and Budget had frozen $400 million in military aid to Ukraine at the direction of the President.2 The contents of the call initially came to light through an intelligence community whistle blower report, but a summary of the call was later made public by President Trump. And proved that he never mentioned any of these things and simply asked "President Volodymyr Zelenskyy" to help end corruption in his country and to investigate what happened with "Cloudstrike" ... 

The House investigation proceeded in two phases. The fact-finding portion of the investigation was primarily handled by the House Intelligence Committee, in cooperation with the Committee on Oversight and Reform and the Committee on Foreign Affairs. The early stage of this phase of the investigation saw some controversy over whether the House must explicitly authorize the initiation of an impeachment investigation. Although the Speaker of the House had announced that the committee investigations constituted an official impeachment inquiry, the White House counsel objected to the investigations on the ground that the investigation lacked the necessary authorization for a valid impeachment proceeding and violated the Due Process Clause.

As a result, the President instructed members of his administration not to cooperate with the House’s unconstitutional inquiry. The House later took action to explicitly approve the impeachment investigation by adopting a resolution authorizing the House committees to continue their ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry into whether sufficient grounds exist . . . to impeach Donald John Trump. Nevertheless, the White House and other Executive Branch offices generally refused to comply with the House investigators requests for information, including subpoenas. Some Executive Branch officials, however, made the individual determination to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry and, as a result, the Intelligence Committee was able to hold a number of investigative hearings and issue a report outlining their findings. The record established in the fact finding phase was then provided to the Judiciary Committee.

Phase two of the impeachment investigation was conducted by the Judiciary Committee. This phase focused on whether the President’s conduct, as uncovered in the fact finding phase of the inquiry, constituted an impeachable offense. Following a series of hearings, the Committee recommended two articles of impeachment against the President, both of which were ultimately approved by the House. The first charged the President with abuse of power, alleging that he had used the powers of his office to solicit Ukraine’s interference in the 2020 election and had conditioned official acts, such as the release of military aid to Ukraine and a White House visit, on President Zelenskyy agreeing to announce the investigations. President Trump, the article alleged, engaged in this scheme or course of conduct for corrupt purposes in pursuit of personal political benefit. The second article charged the President with obstruction of the House impeachment investigation by directing the unprecedented, categorical, and indiscriminate defiance of subpoenas issued by the House of Representatives.

This abuse of office, the article alleged, was subversive of constitutional government and nullif[ied] a vital constitutional safeguard vested solely in the House of Representatives. Although the impeachment articles were adopted by the House on December 18, 2019, the managers were not appointed and the articles not delivered to the Senate until January 15, 2020. The Senate trial was characterized by deep partisan divides and complicated disagreements over questions of law and fact, including presidential motive. But one clear constitutional conflict that arose during the trial involved the proper relationship between impeachment and criminal law. Trial briefs and debate made clear that the House managers and President Trump’s attorneys reached very different conclusions on the question of whether high crimes and misdemeanors require evidence of a criminal act or other legal violation.14 The House, consistent with past impeachment practice, asserted that for purposes of Article II high Crimes and Misdemeanors need not be indictable criminal offenses. 

In response, however, the President’s attorneys asserted that an impeachable offense must be a violation of established law, and that the articles fail[ed] to allege any crime or violation of law whatsoever, let alone ‘high Crimes and Misdemeanors,’ as required by the Constitution. The acquittal provided no clear resolution to these conflicting positions, but the debate over a link between illegal acts and impeachable acts appears to have had some impact on individual Senators. Indeed, the House’s managers’ failure to allege an explicit criminal act appears, along with criticism of the House investigation and failure of the House to prove its case, to have been among the primary reasons given for acquittal.

As the Senate trial proceeded, it became apparent that a major point of contention would be whether the Senate would call its own witnesses. The House managers asked that the Senate authorize subpoenas for relevant Executive Branch documents and for testimony from various White House officials including former National Security Advisor John Bolton.18 With only forty-nine Senators voting in favor, the Senate chose not to approve that request, and the record was limited to the evidence provided by the House. Ultimately, the Senate acquitted President Trump on both counts. Article I failed by a vote of 48-52 while Article II failed by a vote of 47-53.

The second Trump impeachment occurred a year later in the waning days of the Trump presidency following the events on January 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol in which some supporters of President Trump attempted to disrupt the congressional certification of the 2020 presidential election as having been won by Joseph Biden. The House moved quickly following those events. Passing on an investigation, the Judiciary Committee staff compiled publicly available evidence relating to the President’s actions on January 6 and within one week had introduced and approved a single article of impeachment charging the President with incitement to insurrection. Specifically, the article alleged that in the months running up to January 6th the President had consistently issued false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people. He then repeated those claims when addressing a crowd on January 6, and willfully made statements that, in context, encouraged and foreseeable resulted in lawless action at the Capitol. . . . Notably, although the House ultimately impeached President Trump prior to the expiration of his term, the Senate did not commence a trial until after President Trump had left office. 

The Senate trial saw the chamber make two important threshold determinations regarding trials of former Presidents. First, although the Constitution clearly requires the Chief Justice to preside over presidential impeachment trials, the Senate implicitly determined that that requirement does not extend to the trial of a former President. At the opening of the trial, Senator Patrick Leahy, President pro tempore of the United States Senate, was sworn in as presiding officer without objection.

The Senate also made the threshold determination of whether it had the constitutional authority to try a former President. After briefing and debate on the question of whether the Senate had jurisdiction over a former President for acts that occurred during his tenure in office, the Senate explicitly determined by a vote of 56-44 that it did. Thus a majority of Senators, as they have on previous occasions, determined that former officials may be tried by the Senate and, though not removable, remain subject to disqualification from holding future office if convicted. With respect to whether the President had committed an impeachable offense, the main substantive question during the trial arguably revolved around the proper application of the First Amendment. 

The former President’s attorneys invoked the First Amendment as a defense to the impeachment charge, asserting that free speech protections apply and limit the conduct that can be considered an impeachable offense. The President’s political statements at the rally, his attorneys argued, constituted core free speech under the First Amendment and thus not an impeachable offense. 

The House managers disagreed, arguing that The First Amendment has no application in an impeachment proceeding because impeachment does not seek to punish unlawful speech, but instead to protect the Nation from a President who violated his oath of office and abused the public trust. Moreover, even if the First Amendment did restrict the impeachment power, it still would not protect President Trump’s calls to violence, which the managers asserted fell within the well-established category of unprotected speech directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action.

In the end, the First Amendment arguments made by the former President’s attorneys do not appear to have had an impact on Senators, as only one Senator who voted to acquit the former President mentioned the First Amendment in the formal explanation of his vote. Although a majority of Senators voted to convict, former President Trump was ultimately acquitted by a vote of 57-43.

Elon Musk to Spend Less Time At DOGE as of May

Elon Musk had let it be known as of a few weeks ago that in May he would step back a bit from Doge to focus on Tesla and Space X and on Tuesday he re confirmed that he does indeed plan to dramatically scale back his work for the Department of Government Efficiency starting in May and turn his attention more fully to automaker Tesla, which just reported a 71% drop in net profit for the first quarter. After all these morons on the liberal left started to burn the cars, and trucks, and key them and what not. 

But he said that “I think I’ll continue to spend a day or two per week on government matters for as long as [President Donald Trump] would like me to do, and as long as it is useful. But starting next month, I’ll be allocating far more of my time to Tesla,” Musk also said in opening remarks at an audio cast Q&A after Tesla’s March quarter numbers were announced.

The billionaire, who is the world’s richest individual according to Forbes, noted blow back against his role at DOGE, a new entity launched by Donald Trump to unearth what it says are billions of dollars of fraud and abuse in government. Tesla sales have been slumping in the U.S. and abroad and there have been ongoing incidents of Tesla vehicles being vandalized. Tesla showrooms have been targeted by protesters as DOGE has gutted federal departments and agencies, resulting in thousands of layoffs and glitches in critical services. Many DOGE initiatives are being challenged in courts in multiple lawsuits.

A report in early April by job placement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas said more than 280,000 layoffs across 27 agencies over previous two months were linked to DOGE efforts. And as we found out these layoff were all of people who literally did nothing for their pay and were all DEI hired by liberals. So this is a good thing we did here folks. Justified since these people when asked what was their job they couldn't answer it.

“There’s been some blow back for time [spent] in government with the Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE,” Musk said. “I think the work that we’re doing there is actually very important to rein in the deficit that is leading our country … to destruction. And the DOGE team has made a lot of progress in addressing waste and fraud. But [there’s] a natural blow back from … those who were receiving the wasteful dollars and the fraudulent dollars.” They “will try to attack me and anything associated with me,” he said. Musk said he thinks much of the heavy lifting at DOGE is done, allowing “my time allocation … to drop significantly.” He said he will continue to be involved in DOGE likely for “the remainder of the President’s term, just make sure that the waste and fraud that we stopped does not come roaring back.”

He reassured Tesla shareholders, who have knocked the stock lower this year, that despite the weak quarter the company has “been through many near death experiences … and this is not one of those times … not even close.” He also called tariffs implemented by the Trump administration on U.S. global trading partners “tough” on the company. Many U.S. cars and even more auto parts come from overseas. “I just want to emphasize that the tariff decision is entirely up to the President of the United States. I will weigh in with my advice, with the President. 

He will listen to my advice, but then it’s up to him to make this decision. I’ve been on the record many times as saying that I believe lower tariffs are generally a good idea for prosperity, but this decision is finally up to the elected representative of the people, being the President of the United States. 

So, I’ll continue to advocate for lower tariffs rather than higher tariffs, but that’s all I can do.” Also just because Elon is taking less time working with Doge and might step away all together the department is set and it's NOT going away it just means it's got the people in place who are doing the work, and so he can step back and work on Tesla and Space X, and those big Fucking Rockets we all love! 

OBAMA Was behind the Biden/Harris White House says Lindy Li

The now Former DNC fundraiser Lindy Li revealed about how the White House was being ran in an appearance on the “Shawn Ryan Show” this week and what was asked and her answer on what was said, and this didn't shock me or anyone here at PSN and shouldn't shock most reading this but she said that “A lot of people say it was Obama’s third term. There’s rumors of… And these aren’t even… These are friends of mine that are moderate Democrats, say that they thought it was Elizabeth Warren running it. 

They thought it was Bernie Sanders running it,” the host said. “But I think the general consensus, I think if you asked the majority of the population, they think it was Obama’s third term.” Li replied “It was for sure Obama’s third term. I don’t think that’s even a question,” Li continued with “That’s why you saw Obama fighting for his dear life. Why was he fighting so hard in the fall? Because he was fighting for his fourth term. He was fighting for his own legacy,” she said as she juxtaposed the relationship between Biden and Obama with that of Lyndon B. Johnson and John F. Kennedy.

“JFK had little respect for Lyndon B. Johnson, but he picked him anyway because he wanted to win the South. He wanted to win Texas. But he had very little respect for LBJ’s intellect. JFK was surrounded by his Harvard Brain trust, and he had immense disdain for LBJ’s Texas Hill country vibe,” the former operative explained. “That was the same attitude that Obama had towards Biden. Obama thought that Biden would eventually f–k everything up. That’s eventually actually what happened. But also, he didn’t have much faith in Kamala Harris,”

Li said of Obama’s attitude towards Biden. “Before she ascended to the top role, [Obama] was vetting people like [Arizona Democratic Sen.] Mark Kelly and [Kentucky Gov.] Andy Beshear. Most people, most party chieftains, didn’t have Kamala Harris as their number one choice. But in the party of DEI, you can’t skip a black woman. The optics would have been terrible,” she added.

Some of the people who she said were running the United States during the Biden presidency included his personal attorneys as well as senior advisors Steve Ricchetti, Anita Dunn, and Mike Donilon. Li said that others at the helm were Biden’s former chief of staff, Ron Klane, as well as aides Jeff Zients and Bob Bauer. She even took aim at Harris, who she said paid celebrities to endorse her during her campaign against President Donald Trump. 

“Despite her repeated denials, Beyonce was paid,” Li said. “Cardi B, who famously said she wasn’t paid. Her production company was paid to show up,” she said. “Katy Perry was paid. Christina Aguilera was paid. Oprah wasn’t paid a million. She was paid $2 million. $2 million to Harpo Productions.”

In November, Li told “Fox & Friends Weekend” this month that top campaign officials “misled” her and others and that the overall effort by the vice president was an “epic disaster.” Lindy Li, who said she raised “millions” for Harris, explained to co-host Will Cain that Harris’s campaign officials made a series of false promises and repeatedly claimed that the internal data showed the vice president would handily defeat Trump. “This is just an epic disaster. This is a one-billion-dollar disaster,” Li said, referencing how the losing Harris campaign blew through $1 billion in fundraising and ended up with millions of dollars in debt.

“It’s incredible, and I raised millions of that. I have friends that I have to be accountable to and to explain what happened because I told them it was a margin of error race,” she added. Li stated that Harris campaign chair Jen O’Malley Dillon assured all Harris surrogates that the vice president would win, even going so far as to produce videos to reinforce the message. “I believed her. My daughters believed her. And so, they wrote massive checks,” Li told the Fox News co-host. “I feel like a lot of us were misled.” 

LOL Shocking the Liberals lying in order to get money and misleading people on facts regarding elections? WHOA! LOL Who would have thought it huh? This goes to show you folks... Don't trust Liberals.

🔥 Lawmakers DEVASTATE Fani with New Law That Could Leave Her Bankrupt?

Well looks like our favorite "Fani" "What you talking about" Willis could end up bankrupt after lawmakers are passing a bill which folks could change things in GA forever. Georgia lawmakers passed a new system to pay the wrongfully convicted and here is where current POTUS 47 comes in as his case in GA is tied in so with this now we also find out that the Trump election case was added and he could sue her office along with people like Young Thug for who knows how many MILLIONS! Esentially bankrupting her.

Next stop is Gov. Brian Kemp’s desk for a signature.

Senate Bill 244, originally inspired by Trump’s election interference case in Georgia, was later amended to revive the Wrongful Conviction Compensation Act, a stalled House bill that was aimed at providing reparations to people wrongfully incarcerated. House lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have faced an uphill battle in their efforts to properly compensate those who have been wrongfully incarcerated. The process is currently done on a case-by-case basis through individual compensation resolutions that must pass through the full legislative process like any other bill. Legislation to standardize the process was initially introduced by Atlanta Democratic Rep. Scott Holcomb in 2022, and re-introduced in 2023, but his efforts have repeatedly been stalled in the Senate by Republican opposition. The version that ultimately emerged as the clock ran out on the 2025 legislative session Friday, sponsored by Alpharetta Republican Sen. Brandon Beach, secured a 35-18 vote in its second pass through the Senate, with all Republicans and the three highest-ranking Senate Democrats voting in support of the legislation. Its passage also marked a final sine die gavel for Beach, a staunch Trump ally who was recently appointed by the president to serve as U.S. Treasurer.

If Gov. Brian Kemp signs the bill into law, it will allow criminal defendants to recoup their legal costs from county prosecuting attorneys’ budgets in cases where the prosecutor is disqualified for personal or professional misconduct. (During Trump’s election interference case in Georgia, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis was disqualified after an appeals court judge found that her romantic relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade created a “significant appearance of impropriety.”) Separately, it will establish a new process under Georgia state law for people who have been convicted for crimes they did not commit and later exonerated, allowing administrative law judges to rule on wrongful conviction compensation cases and awarding a standardized rate of $75,000 for each year of incarceration to each exoneree, with an additional $25,000 added for each year spent on death row.

This is the third consecutive biennium that legislators in the House have attempted to reform the system for compensating those who have been wrongfully incarcerated. However, Republican opposition in the Senate particularly from Sen. Randy Robertson, a Cataula Republican and former law enforcement officer has repeatedly stalled those efforts. Under current Georgia law, those who have been wrongfully convicted must find a state representative who is willing to sponsor an individual compensation resolution for them and file a claim with Georgia’s Claims Advisory Board. Those resolutions then go through the full legislative process and must pass committees and floor votes in both the House and Senate before they can take effect, but those efforts too have routinely died in the Senate in recent years.

Though Robertson emphasized that he was still not fully on board with the legislation aimed at compensating the wrongfully convicted, he conceded that the current system was in need of reform in a speech on the final day of the 2025 legislative session. “What I realized is the process is not a good process,” Robertson said, but vowed to continue work shopping the wrongful conviction component of the bill after the 2025 legislative session concludes. “I’m going to ask you today to support the senator from the 21st and vote for this legislation, and in the off-season, we’ll tackle the other thing that’s attached to it and we’ll come up with a process that works,” he continued, addressing his Senate colleagues. “Support this bill, get it across, and I promise you the fight’s not over.” Democrats also condemned the original language of the bill, arguing that it could have a disproportionate impact on smaller counties with more limited budgets, and discourage prosecutors from tackling complex or high-profile cases.

But Holcomb celebrated its passage. “This will give hope to real people whose lives were devastated and destroyed by a wrongful conviction, and it gives them a path to get some measure of compensation so they can restart their lives,” he said. “I’m very grateful for that. This is a major legislative achievement that comes out of this session.” Though he acknowledged that there is no way to fully undo a wrongful conviction, he hopes that the new system will bring equality and efficiency to the process. “There isn’t a person alive who would trade the money that these individuals are receiving for what happened to them in terms of being locked up in our state’s prisons, for usually for decades of their lives for something that they didn’t do,” he said. “This is a path to provide some remedy. It’s an inadequate remedy in terms of nothing can bring back those years, but it’s an adequate remedy in terms of dollars that will really help them through the remaining years of their lives.”

Elon Musk busted "US Institute Of Peace" Deleting A 'Terabyte' Of Data To 'Cover Their Crimes' OMG!!

Elon Musk Claims US Institute Of Peace Deleted 'Terabyte' Of Data To 'Cover Their Crimes' which folks lead up to them handing MILLIONS of dollars over to the Taliban! Now this is incredible as these people were busted deleting a Terabyte worth of data which was records showing where the money went. Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), said all this on Wednesday Musk made the accusation while responding to a post detailing the efforts made by DOGE and law enforcement agencies to uncover fraud at the think tank. The USIP is a government-funded organisation focused on preventing and resolving global conflicts. 

 Elon claimed that despite USIP’s attempt to erase crucial data, DOGE had successfully recovered the information. DOGE is an initiative formed during Donald Trump’s second term, aimed at reducing public sector spending. “They deleted a terabyte of financial data to cover their crimes, but they don’t understand technology, so we recovered it," Musk said on X. The post that Musk responded to outlined how DOGE, with assistance from the FBI and Metro Police, fought for days to access the US Institute of Peace’s records. “The DOGE team fought for days to gain access to the United States Institute of Peace. Eventually, with help from the FBI and Metro Police DOGE was able to access the agency and discovered massive fraud, waste and abuse-including payments to Taliban and Iraq," the post read.

DOGE: The DOGE team fought for days to gain access to the United States Institute of Peace. Eventually, with help from the FBI and Metro Police DOGE was able to access the agency and discovered massive fraud, waste and abuse-including payments to Taliban and Iraq. pic.twitter.com/VymOebovfY

— @amuse (@amuse) March 31, 2025

Reposting the user’s post with a comment, Musk also took the opportunity to mock the USIP, saying, “Any government institution is most likely to be the opposite of its name." The US Institute of Peace was established during former US President Ronald Reagan’s administration. According to a description on usa.gov, the USIP “promotes research, policy analysis, education, and training on international peace and conflict resolution in an effort to prevent and resolve violent conflicts, and to promote post-conflict stability." However, its official website has since been taken down.

In February, US President Donald Trump had signed an executive order aimed at reducing the size of the Federal Government, including actions against the US Institute of Peace, which is now under DOGE’s purview. The order had stated the goal of increasing accountability within government institutions. George Foote, who served as counsel to the USIP till he was dismissed by DOGE, is now involved in legal proceedings seeking to prevent the dismissal of top officials at the institute. Foote is challenging the legality of DOGE’s actions in court.

Bill Maher’s ‘Mind Was Blown’ After White House Meal With Trump

Well as we know Bill Maher the talk show host was meeting Donald Trump our President and now this meeting has happened and well looks like Bill here has been as it's being quoted around as ‘Mind Was Blown’ After White House Meal With Trump. Kid Rock has revealed that comedian Bill Maher’s “mind was blown” after his White House sit down with President Donald Trump. The MAGA musician, who brokered the meet up between the traditional foes, was on Fox & Friends Tuesday morning to talk about how it went down. He, Maher and Ultimate Fighting Championship CEO Dana White were all invited to Washington, D.C. to break bread with the president.

And all of them were suitably impressed by the MAGA commander-in-chief, the “All Summer Long” singer claimed. “Trump is the type of person you have to meet him to understand him,” he said. “Me and Dana said there has never been anyone whoever met the president who has walked away without saying ‘wow, what a great guy.’ [He’s] so funny and engaging and so smart. Bill even said to me after... he goes ‘wow, that was...’ Everybody’s mind was blown, even the president’s.”



He revealed that Trump himself even had reservations about the meeting. “The president called me late last night. Everyone was a little suspect going into this,” the singer claimed. “Even the president said ‘what have you got me doing?’ “Man, we’re trying to show people that even though we’ve been hard on each other when you get face-to-face maybe we can have more civility in the country and try to bring people together. That was my whole intention.”

Kid Rock, real name Robert James Ritchie, detailed what was on the agenda before the group met. “He had never been to the White House,“ he said of Maher. ”The president was gracious. [He] took us up to the private residence, [we] saw the Gettysburg Address in the Lincoln Bedroom.” The group also pored over their shared hatred of “wokeness,” Kid Rock told the hosts. “President Trump extended the olive branch and talked about things we had in common. Ending wokeness, securing the border,” he said. “The president was asking him what he thought about policy going on with Iran and Israel and things. It blew my mind. I was very proud.”

Trump lamented on Truth Social the evening before the Monday sit down that Maher had been “unjustifiably critical of anything or anyone Trump,” but it appears the two might have now found common ground despite the comedian’s quip that he would not be “leaving in a MAGA hat.” Trump and Maher, who has ingratiated himself to the MAGA world due to his “wait and see” attitude towards Trump 2.0, have yet to comment publicly on the meeting, but Kid Rock said photos of the sit down would be released soon.

Elon Musk gives out $1 million payments to 2 Wisconsin voters after state supreme court refused legal challenge

One of the recipients, Nicholas Jacobs, is listed as the chairman of the Wisconsin Federation of College Republicans.

 
But it's now settled as by a unanimous Wisconsin Supreme Court on Sunday refused to hear a last-minute attempt by the state's 'Democratic attorney general' to stop billionaire Elon Musk from handing over $1 million checks to two voters, a ruling that came just minutes before the start of the rally. The Two lower courts had already rejected the legal challenge by Democrat Josh Kaul, who argues that Musk's offer violates a state law. "Wisconsin law prohibits offering anything of value to induce anyone to vote," Kaul argued in his filing. "Yet, Elon Musk did just that."

But the state Supreme Court, which is currently controlled 4-3 by liberal justices, declined to take the case as an original action. The court gave no rationale for its decision. Taking the stage in Green Bay wearing a yellow foam cheesehead hat, Musk gave out $1 million checks on Sunday to two Wisconsin voters, declaring them spokespeople for his political group.

Noting the likelihood the state high court will take up redistricting that could give Democrats a chance at winning two additional U.S. House seats, Musk said, "The House majority is now razor thin." "And if the (Wisconsin) Supreme Court is able to redraw the districts, they will gerrymander the district and deprive Wisconsin of two seats on the Republican side," Musk said. "Then they will try to stop all the government reforms we are getting done, for you the American people." Wisconsin's tightly contested Supreme Court election, where ideological control of the court is at stake, is on Tuesday. The race, with the assist from Musk, has become the most expensive judicial election in American history, with more than $81 million in spending.

Liberals currently hold a 4-3 majority. But five of the court's seven justices have endorsed a candidate in the race, raising potential conflicts for them to hear the Musk lawsuit. The court's liberal justices have endorsed Dane County Judge Susan Crawford, the Democratic-backed candidate. One of the court's conservative justices has endorsed Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel, who also has the backing of President Trump and Musk. Schimel wore a "Make America Great Again Hat" while campaigning Sunday.

"That's exactly what I've committed to anybody, whether it's President Trump, Elon Musk or any donors and donors or supporters or voters in Wisconsin. That's my commitment," Schimel told "Fox News Sunday." It's unclear whether Schimel attended the rally. Crawford's campaign declined to comment on Kaul's legal filing, and Kaul had no immediate comment on the court's order. "Wisconsin law prohibits offering anything of value to induce anyone to vote," Kaul had argued in his filing. "Yet, Elon Musk did just that."

Musk's political action committee used a nearly identical tactic before the presidential election last year, offering to pay $1 million a day to voters in Wisconsin and six other battleground states who signed a petition supporting the First and Second Amendments. A judge in Pennsylvania said prosecutors failed to show the effort was an illegal lottery and allowed it to continue through Election Day.

Musk on Friday initially said in a post on his social media platform, X, that he planned to "personally hand over" $2 million to a pair of voters who have already cast their ballots in the race. Musk later posted a clarification, saying the money would go to people who will be "spokesmen" for an online petition against "activist" judges. After first saying the event would only be open to people who had voted in the Supreme Court race, he said attendance would be limited to those who have signed the petition. 

Also on Friday, Musk's political action committee identified the recipient of its first $1 million giveaway a Green Bay man who had donated to the Wisconsin GOP and the conservative candidate in the court race, and who has a history of posting support for Trump and his agenda. The judicial election comes as Wisconsin's highest court is expected to rule on abortion rights, congressional redistricting, union power and voting rules that could affect the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election in the state.

There will also be congressional elections held Tuesday in Florida that have attracted big fundraising. Florida's 6th District was vacated when National Security Adviser Mike Waltz joined Mr. Trump's Cabinet, and the 1st District was held by former Rep. Matt Gaetz, who resigned to join the Trump administration as Attorney General. 

He eventually withdrew his name from consideration, but he had already vacated his seat. Both districts voted for Mr. Trump by 30 points or more, but Democrats have dominated fundraising.