🚨U.S. Capitol Police Investigating Video of 2 Men Having Sex in Senate Hearing Room

So remember folks evil deeds done by evil people who live a risky life with skeletons in their closet are always rewarded with KARMA and well as the U.S. Capitol Police are investigating reports of two men having sex in public on Capitol grounds, The Advocate confirmed late Friday that a very explicit video reportedly shot in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill has ignited widespread controversy and attention online. The Daily Caller, first reported on the existence of the video on Friday. The clip depicts two men engaged in a sexual act in what the publication claims is room Hart 216.

The footage seems to be shot in a Senate hearing room and it's said the video has two unidentified men engaged in a sexual act inside what appears to be a room known for hosting hearings by the Senate Judiciary Committee. One of the men is nude and hunched over the dais behind which senators would typically sit when conducting official business and questioning witnesses. The clip, recorded from the perspective of the other participant, includes a brief pan of the Senate seal on the wall.
“We are aware and looking into this," a spokesperson for the Capitol Police told The Advocate Friday evening in response to a request for comment. 

Reports are that The Advocate contacted the office of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, the New York Democrat, but did not immediately hear back. 

Widely circulated and unconfirmed reports online identified a staffer for Maryland Democratic Sen. Ben Cardin as one of the people who are shown in the video. He's the Anti Trump cock sucker in the video on top and now I can say he's a cock sucker because he indeed is now known to be a man who enjoys sucking cock. As per the video he's also a massive asshole.

"We have seen media reports emanating from the right-wing media. As this is a personnel matter and under review, we will not be commenting further at this time," a spokesperson for Cardin told The Advocate. 

LOL "A personal Matter" yea had this been a conservative these same leftists would be calling for an instant removal or whoever it was from stepping in congress again. Talk about a pervert though! Old man can't go have his gay sex in private in his own home or Hotel? What a dick! LOL

Hey Nasty Nancy Mr Biggs said take a hike!

House Freedom Caucus Chairman, and my new hero of the week Andy Biggs, R-AZ, is calling for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “to be removed from her post as Speaker of the House,” in a new op-ed for FoxNews.com. “Isn’t it past time for Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to leave her office as Speaker of the House? I call upon our leaders in Congress to put forward the Motion to Vacate the Chair that has been prepared and merely needs to be brought to the floor,” Biggs wrote in his opinion piece.

Biggs used several examples that he believes are reasons for her removal where Pelosi acted “above the law,” including her recent visit to get her hair blown dry which violated her home State’s COVID-19 lockdown order.

Pelosi, however, claims she was “set up” by the salon’s owner and wasn’t aware of the rules that San Francisco residents can only have their hair done outdoors.

“Frankly, it a narcissistic, authoritarian view,” Biggs added. Moreover, he said it’s “the same hubris that is demonstrated in Pelosi’s attacks on a small business owner, with the apparent objective of crushing her, also permitted the corruption of our federal intelligence gathering apparatus to spy on a political opponent’s campaign, denies that Marxist agitators are rioting, looting, and murdering; and when polling shows that Americans know better, tries to change the narrative to blame Trump.”

GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz files a criminal referral against Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg with William Barr

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., on Monday asked Attorney General William Barr to open a criminal investigation into Mark Zuckerberg over allegations that the Facebook CEO lied to Congress.

In a letter to Barr, Gaetz accused the social media executive of making false statements to Congress on two occasions in 2018. He alleged that Zuckerberg “repeatedly and categorically denied any bias against conservative speech, persons, policies or politics” on his platform.

“On both occasions, members of Congress asked Mr. Zuckerberg about allegations that Facebook censored and suppressed content supportive of President Donald Trump and other conservatives,” Gaetz wrote.

“Mr. Zuckerberg also dismissed the suggestion that Facebook exercises any form of editorial manipulation,” he added.

Zuckerberg made the remarks in 2018 under questioning from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Tex., who accused Facebook of “bias and censorship.” Cruz cited a 2016 Gizmodo revealing allegations that the social media platform had knowingly suppressing conservative news. Zuckerberg responded:

I understand where that concern is coming from, because Facebook and the tech industry are located in Silicon Valley, which is an extremely left-leaning place. And this is actually a concern that I have, and that I try to root out in the company, is making sure that we don’t have any bias in the work that we do. And I think it is a fair concern that people would at least wonder about.

As evidence to support his claims, Gaetz directed Barr to a recent sting by Project Veritas, a right-wing organization known for its efforts to take down liberal organizations, mainstream media outlets and public figures through misinformation and deceptively edited “insider” videos.

Project Veritas published hidden-camera footage of purported Facebook content moderators apparently admitting that they delete conservative posts. Gaetz says the “whistleblowers” in the video offer “ample evidence” of the company’s “bias and manipulation.”

“According to the Veritas report and undercover footage, the adjudicators were outspoken about their political bias against Republicans and actively chose to eliminate otherwise-allowable content from the platform and from public view simply due to its political orientation,” Gaetz wrote.

“At the same time,” Gaetz added, “speech promoting violence against the president and his supporters was labeled as merely ‘political,’ and was thus allowed to stay on the platform.”

The Republican representative also claims, without citing evidence, that Facebook’s artificial intelligence content screening program is itself not politically neutral, which he alleges is a violation of the “good faith” provision of the Communications Decency Act.

Republicans — from internet trolls, up to lawmakers and President Donald Trump himself — regularly accuse Facebook and other social media platforms of anti-conservative bias.

However, Facebook launched its own project in the weeks after the 2016 election — “Project P,” for propaganda — which found dozens of pages peddling fake news ahead of Trump’s victory. Nearly all the pages were based overseas, had financial motives and “displayed a clear rightward bent,” according to the Washington Post.

Another reason why moderators may encounter a higher volume of flagged conservative content is because Facebook’s most popular content has become overwhelmingly conservative over time. “Facebook has become the home of right-wing America, while Twitter and Snap have become the home of the left,” Vanity Fair’s Nick Bilton reported earlier this year.

And while liberals have criticized Facebook for refusing to fact-check political ads — and even threatened to break up the social media platform — a number of leading conservatives have reportedly met in secret with Zuckerberg, including Tucker Carlson, Sen. Lindsey Graham, and on at least one occasion, Trump himself. Zuckerberg has not disclosed the content of those meetings.

Second Stimulus Check Now Might Be More Than $1,200

So the Senate is currently working out the details to the next coronavirus relief package, which will pass once Democrats and Republicans agree on everything in it, but that’s not all that has to happen before qualified Americans can get the stimulus check included. The President has to sign off on it also, and in an interview yesterday, he took issue with the current amount of the stimulus check, which he thinks isn’t enough, and I for one agree.

Even though both sides of the aisle tentatively agreed on a check for $1,200 to anyone making $75,000 or less, like the first check was, Trump wants it to be more. When asked by WMID in Texas this week, “Is $1,200 enough?” Trump responded, “We’re going to see. It may go higher than that actually.” He went on to state:

“I’d like to see it be very high because I love the people. I want the people to get it, you know. The economy is going to come back. We just had tremendous job numbers as you know it was just announced. We had great retail sales numbers, so this is all coming back. We had the greatest economy we’ve ever had and we had to close it up because you know we had to do it. We saved millions of lives by doing that, but now we’re bringing it back and now it’s going to come back. We gotta take care of the people in the meantime.”

He might have a difficult time accomplishing that. Some Republicans already think the $1 trillion price tag on the bill is too high, so adding more to it might be a hard sell. As it stands, a $1,200 check will go to anyone making less than $75,000, while those who earn more will get $1,200 minus 5% of the amount they make over $75K. Meanwhile, joint filers earning less than $150,000 get the full benefit and those who make more will have their check reduced by 5% of the amount over $150K they earn. Anyone qualified will also receive $500 extra for any dependents.

No word on when the stimulus checks will go out though as there are a lot of things left for Republicans and Democrats to agree on. Other sticking points are unemployment benefits, state and local financial assistance, and liability protection for businesses, schools and hospitals. Hopefully they can come to an agreement fast and pass a bill before August 7, when the Senate takes their summer recess. If they do, expect checks to go out about 13 business days after a package passes. However, if they can’t agree on a bill before their recess or if Trump vetoes it, you might not see a check until October. This doesn’t work for most Americans struggling to pay for rent, food, and bills which are piling up while most of us are stuck not being able to work or find a job. Honestly they should just give everyone who made less than 75k last year a $2,500 check a month for the rest of this year or until we have a handle on this virus. This is the only way to keep the economy moving, and we need to not give another dime to Millionaires, and Billion Dollar companies. I mean they’re BILLIONAIRES! They don’t need more money.

THE SENATE ASSUMPTIONS TRIAL TO REMOVE TRUMP! 🚨DAY 5🚨

The impeachment trial of President Donald J. Trump resumes Friday, Jan. 24 as Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts presides over the U.S. Senate. Trump’s team will begin opening arguments at 10 a.m. ET. #FoxNews