Appeals Court Kicks Willis Out

Appeals Court Kicks Fani Willis Out on her fat ass on the Donald Trump prosecution and so this now CRUMBLES! Letitia James NEXT to Go? Finally the Georgia appeals court booted Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s (D) office from the 2020 election interference case against President-elect Trump on Thursday due to her relationship with a top prosecutor on the case. Something which should have never been brought to court to start with but now it's just another witch haunt on Trump which went nowhere but only was done to try and hurt the election of Trump which ended up as a major fail in every way.

The panel described Willis’s relationship with ex-special prosecutor Nathan Wade as a “significant appearance of impropriety.” The court declined to outright dismiss Trump’s indictment, but disqualifying Willis’s office throws the future of the case already complicated by Trump’s impending return to the White House further into doubt. Folks in other words this case is DEAD like Fani Willis political career, and she needs to have her Barr license evoked.

“After carefully considering the trial court’s findings in its order, we conclude that it erred by failing to disqualify DA Willis and her office,” Judge E. Trenton Brown III wrote in the court’s ruling. “The remedy crafted by the trial court to prevent an ongoing appearance of impropriety did nothing to address the appearance of impropriety that existed at times when DA Willis was exercising her broad pretrial discretion about who to prosecute and what charges to bring,” it continued. The decision leaves open a theoretical possibility another prosecutor could take over the case, but the path forward remains precarious. Trump’s legal team has separately sought to dismiss all his criminal prosecutions on the grounds that he is the president-elect.

“As the Court rightfully noted, only the remedy of disqualification will suffice to restore public confidence,” Trump attorney Steve Sadow said in a statement. “This decision puts an end to a politically motivated persecution of the next President of the United States.” The Hill has requested comment from Willis’s office. Defense attorney Ashleigh Merchant, who represents one of Trump’s co-defendants and brought the initial claim against Willis and Wade, said she and her client are “thankful” the court agreed Willis should not be allowed to prosecute the case any further. Willis charged Trump and more than a dozen of his allies last summer for allegedly entering a months-long unlawful conspiracy to overturn President Biden’s 2020 victory in Georgia.



The revelation of the romance between Willis and Wade, whom the district attorney hired to spearhead the Trump prosecution, created a months-long detour in the case. After a whirlwind hearing in February that saw both prosecutors take the stand, Judge Scott McAfee, who oversees the trial proceedings, found the romance amounted to an appearance of a conflict. The judge said the prosecution could move ahead if Wade stepped aside, which he quickly did. For months, Trump and his allies have appealed that ruling to the Georgia Court of Appeals, insisting the district attorney should not be allowed to move forward. In the meantime, the trial proceedings ground to a halt. 

The appeals court panel in Thursday’s ruling rejected Trump’s arguments that the romance amounted to an actual conflict agreeing it was only an appearance of one but said the judge was wrong to conclude Willis could move ahead.

“While we recognize that an appearance of impropriety generally is not enough to support disqualification, this is the rare case in which disqualification is mandated and no other remedy will suffice to restore public confidence in the integrity of these proceedings,” the appeals court wrote. Judge Ben Land dissented from the other two judges on the panel, suggesting the appeals court should defer to the trial judge’s findings instead of interfering with their discretion.

“Where, as here, a prosecutor has no actual conflict of interest and the trial court, based on the evidence presented to it, rejects the allegations of actual impropriety, we have no authority to reverse the trial court’s denial of a motion to disqualify,” Land wrote. “None. Even where there is an appearance of impropriety.” Willis could appeal the ruling to the state’s Supreme Court. But if that effort fails, the case against Trump and his allies will be handed over to the Prosecuting Attorneys Council of Georgia. It would follow the same trajectory as when Willis’s office was previously disqualified from prosecuting Georgia Lt. Gov Burt Jones (R) in the case after she fundraised for his political opponent.

More than two years later, the council declined to bring charges.

A Court judgment against DA Fani Willis?

I don't know who is worse Tish James up in NY or Fani Willis in GA. Bot these women suffer deep with TDS and both seem to not be able to read the writing on the wall that their b/s lies and games are over and it's time to call it a day and move on. 

They literally are breaking laws to do what they're doing to Trump and what they don't understand is when Trump is sworn in they're FUCKED! So if they're smart which they're not they would just drop it all issue an apology and WALK AWAY... But these are what we call "DUMB HOOD RATS" who were put in a position to do harm to not just Trump but the entire country and whoever they wanted to mess with. 

But looks like the tide is turning as a Fulton County Superior Court has issued a default judgment against District Attorney Fani Willis for refusing to turn over records that could document her collusion with the J6 committee and Special Counsel Jack Smith. 

The court order states: "By finding the Defendant in default, the Court has effectively declared that she violated the ORA [Open Records Act]. The Court further ORDERS the Defendant to conduct a thorough search of her records for responsive materials within five business days of this Order's entry."

"Within the same five-day period, the Defendant is ORDERED to provide the Plaintiff with copies of all responsive records that are not legally exempt or excepted from disclosure. If the Defendant must or chooses to withhold any portion of a requested record, she is instructed to adhere to the procedures outlined in the ORA." However, the Fulton County D.A. claims that such records don't exist, potentially putting her at legal risk of perjury and obstruction of justice.

The court makes it clear that it has substantive reason to believe Willis is withholding records: "Defendant is further ORDERED to provide an explanation why such correspondence does not exist in Defendant’s records (or why it is being withheld)." 

However, if Willis does turn over the records, it could provide proof of a criminal conspiracy. Oh, the irony.

Mean while in NY this moron fat woman who thinks she's above the law AG Letitia James is still in LALA Land thinking she's going to take Trump down... She now is get this folks! She's vowing war?

New York attorney general Letitia James vows war on Trump in hostile press conference https://t.co/BKA9AMtxyj

— VOZ (@Voz_US) November 7, 2024

She ran on getting Trump by any means! She's an idiot who is trying to make a criminal out of Trump with a crime that doesn't exist! She continues even tho she's lied over and over and it's been seen on video.

Both Fani and Letitia are lunatics. But my god it's amazing how these people just won't give it up. The mentality shows that they don't get it still or what's the deal? The writing is on the wall as soon as Trump is in office he will make all this junk just go away if they don't step down. 

To talk about going to WAR with a President? Who the hell do these idiots think they are? They talk about not letting someone be above the law and yet they break the law, and they're all acting nonstop like they're above the law.

Trump election interference case Dropped!

Don't know about you folks but Trump was wrong about one thing! I will never get tired of seeing our side win! LOL Now hear this! The Judge grants Jack Smith request to dismiss Jan. 6 charges against Trump... After the appeal was dropped in the Florida docs case Trump says lawfare against him was a 'political hijacking,' but says he 'persevered against all odds, and WON' So yes he did as now a judge has dropped again all the charges against President-elect Donald Trump in the D.C. case against him, following a request that Special Counsel Jack Smith made on Monday.

The decision concerns the investigation into the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol breach. Fox News Digital previously learned of Smith's request earlier on Monday. "The Government has moved to dismiss the Superseding Indictment without prejudice," U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan wrote in a decision. "Defendant does not oppose the Motion…and the court will grant it." Jack also filed a motion to drop his appeal in his classified records case against Trump a case that was tossed in July by federal Judge Aileen Cannon. 

Jude Cannon ruled Smith was unlawfully appointed as special counsel. The moves come after Smith had already filed a motion to vacate all deadlines in the 2020 election interference case against Trump in Washington, D.C. a widely expected move, but one that stopped short of dropping the case against Trump completely. Smith had said his team planned to give an updated report on the official status of the case against Trump on Dec. 2. Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges in the case and took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing on the basis of presidential immunity. The high court ruled that Trump was immune from prosecution for official presidential acts, forcing Smith to file a new indictment. Trump pleaded not guilty to those new charges, too. Trump's attorneys have been seeking to have the election interference charges dropped in Washington, D.C., alleging that Smith was appointed unlawfully.

"The American People re-elected President Trump with an overwhelming mandate to Make America Great Again. Today’s decision by the DOJ ends the unconstitutional federal cases against President Trump, and is a major victory for the rule of law," Trump spokesman and incoming White House communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement. "The American People and President Trump want an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and we look forward to uniting our country." Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges stemming from both of Smith’s investigations.

Smith is expected to resign as special counsel before Trump takes office. Trump posted to his Truth Social Monday afternoon that the cases against him "are empty and lawless and should never have been brought." "These cases, like all of the other cases I have been forced to go through, are empty and lawless, and should never have been brought. Over $100 Million Dollars of Taxpayer Dollars has been wasted in the Democrat Party’s fight against their Political Opponent, ME," Trump posted. "Nothing like this has ever happened in our Country before." Although the case will still go forward for Trump’s two co-defendants, valet Walt Nauta and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos de Oliveira, the order satisfies Smith’s request to terminate an appeal in the case as it concerns Trump. In both cases, Smith cited Trump’s upcoming inauguration and Department of Justice guidelines that prohibit the prosecution of sitting presidents. Smith also moved to dismiss Trump’s election meddling case without prejudice. Smith was contesting Judge Aileen Cannon’s decision to dismiss the case in the classified materials case, which found that the special counsel had been appointed illegally.

Liberals clung to hope that the appeal would be successful, claiming that Judge Cannon’s decision counters 50 years of prior rulings regarding special counsel regulations, and the court has previously reversed one of her decisions. “Nonetheless, it brings to an end for Trump a serious case focused largely on his conduct after leaving the White House. It was potentially the stronger of Smith’s two cases after a Supreme Court ruling that determined former presidents retain broad immunity for their conduct while in office. Prosecutors brought both Espionage Act and obstruction of justice charges against Trump after he repeatedly refused requests to return White House records, including defying a subpoena,” The Hill reported.

Trump said "state Prosecutors and District Attorneys, such as Fani Willis and her lover, Nathan Wade (who had absolutely zero experience in cases such as this, but was paid MILLIONS, enough for them to take numerous trips and cruises around the globe!), Letitia James, who inappropriately, unethically, and probably illegally, campaigned on ‘GETTING TRUMP’ in order to win Political Office, and Alvin Bragg, who himself never wanted to bring this case against me, but was forced to do so by the Justice Department and the Democrat Party."

🚨 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed to drop President-elect Trump’s classified documents case in Florida pic.twitter.com/lTsKthn5FB

— Martin Walsh (@martinwalsh__) November 26, 2024

Trump reportedly has a plan in place to fire the entire team of Jack Smith, including the prosecutor himself, and investigate the results of the previous election in which he was defeated by President Joe Biden. The president-elect plans to even get rid of the career attorneys who are typically protected from political retribution, The Washington Post reported. Trump “wants to clean out ‘the bad guys, the people who went after me,’” a source close to the president-elect said. The special prosecutor’s team consists of dozens of attorneys, FBI agents, and staff who were likely assigned to the cases and did not choose to be on his team, the report said. “President Trump campaigned on firing rogue bureaucrats who have engaged in the illegal weaponization of our American justice system, and the American people can expect he will deliver on that promise,” Karoline Leavitt, the press secretary for the president-elect, said to The Post.

“House Republicans previously told Justice Department officials that anyone who had worked on the Trump cases with Smith should preserve all of their communications in a move that signaled that Smith, among others, could be targeted by congressional investigators,” the report said. “Trump also apparently plans to use the DOJ to investigate the 2020 election in which he lost to President Joe Biden but has continued to claim that his loss was due to widespread cheating. Many investigations have found no proof of the widespread voter fraud Trump and his GOP allies claimed,” it said. Smith is likely to step down from his position after ending his cases against President-elect Donald Trump, according to reports. A Justice Department source told CNN that Smith is in talks with DOJ leaders about how best to wind down the Jan. 6 case as well as an appeal of U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s ruling over the summer to throw out his classified documents case against the soon-to-be 47th president.

“Trump has threatened to fire Smith, but Smith expects to be gone before Trump takes office,” CNN reported. “The talks between Smith and DOJ leaders extend beyond Trump’s criminal cases to questions about what to do with other defendants in the classified documents case as well as the special counsel’s office and what happens to its budget and staff,” the outlet continued. Smith is required to submit a report on his work to Attorney General Merrick Garland. It remains unclear whether the timing of Smith’s departure will be affected if the report needs to be reviewed and approved by the intelligence community, according to sources familiar with the discussions, CNN said. Smith is working to finalize the report before Trump takes office, as Garland will need to approve it and decide whether any part of it will be released publicly, one source said. The New York Times was the first to report Smith’s plans to resign from his post.

As president, Trump is afforded protections against prosecution that he didn’t have as a private citizen. Longstanding Justice Department policy dictates that a sitting president cannot be prosecuted for crimes, and a Supreme Court ruling this summer confirmed that Trump has “absolute” immunity from prosecution for actions taken within his core constitutional powers as president, CNN said. Before his departure, Smith will need to determine how to resolve the two criminal cases he initiated against Trump. In Florida, Smith has appealed Cannon’s decision to dismiss the classified documents case, which found that Smith was unconstitutionally appointed as special counsel and that the funding for his office also violated the law. In Washington, D.C., Smith’s team is moving forward with the criminal case accusing Trump of orchestrating a conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election following the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity, CNN noted.

Jeff brother of Tim Walz pro Trump?

US election 2024 INFO: Our own Laura Loomer the well known Right-wing activist posted that Jeff Walz, the brother of Democratic Vice Presidential nominee Tim Walz, supports Republican Presidential pick Donald Trump, and yes this news has now gone viral. As we could expect the news of Jeff Walz, the brother of Kamala Harris’s running mate Tim Walz coming out as a supporter of Republican presidential Donald Trump the online speculation about the reclusive Walz brother’s political leanings took social media by storm.

After Laura Loomer posted a photograph, purportedly of a donation slip, which she claims shows that Jeff Walz donated to Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. While the authenticity of this photograph couldn't be verified, the post has since gone viral, sparking heated debate. 

Loomer’s post on X (formerly Twitter) read, "Tim Walz @GovTimWalz and @KamalaHarris are such a bad Presidential ticket that Walz's own BROTHER is supporting Donald Trump instead."

Sharing “evidence”, she continued, "According to these FEC records, Jeff Walz, the brother of VP candidate Tim Walz, donated to President Trump's presidential campaign in 2016. Jeff Walz lives in Florida. Perhaps I will go interview and ask him about his support for Donald Trump." The controversy deepened as Loomer shared more alleged details about Jeff Walz’s political stance. She claimed that on March 30, 2023, the same day Trump was indicted for business fraud, Jeff Walz referred to the US under the Biden administration as a “third world banana republic” on his Facebook page.

Loomer wrote, “Jeff Walz, the brother of Democrat Vice Presidential candidate Tim Walz, donated to President Trump’s 2016 Presidential campaign and said ‘We’ve just become a third world banana republic’ on his Facebook page... Now she’s running for President with Jeff’s brother.” In the wake of Loomer's posts, Jeff Walz made statements on Facebook distancing himself from his brother's political ideologies. In a comment, he expressed his disapproval, saying, "The stories I could tell. Not the type of character you want making decisions about your future."

NEW:

🚨🚨🚨

Tim Walz @GovTimWalz and @KamalaHarris are such a bad Presidential ticket that Walz’s own BROTHER is supporting Donald Trump instead.

According to these FEC records, Jeff Walz, the brother of VP candidate Tim Walz, donated to President Trump’s presidential… pic.twitter.com/6wEwGo6bCu

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) August 30, 2024

He also revealed a strained relationship with his brother, stating, "Haven't spoke to him in 8 years. I'm 100% opposed to all his ideology." Jeff Walz alleged that after Tim Walz was tapped as Kamala Harris’s running mate, his family was not informed or provided with any security. He also said he had "thought about" joining forces with Trump and publicly endorsing his re-election bid. Not much is known about Tim Walz’s brother Jeff, except that he was born in Nebraska and currently lives in Florida. The brothers have two other siblings: a sister named Sandy who lives in Alliance, Nebraska, and a brother named Craig who died in a camping accident in 2016

On the other hand, the person who put Jeff Walz in the spotlight is quite a notorious figure. A far-right internet personality and activist from Florida, Laura Loomer is known for her inflammatory rhetoric. She has previously described herself as a “proud Islamophobe,” a label that has resulted in bans from major social media platforms, though her X account was reinstated after Elon Musk took control of the platform. Loomer has a history of making incendiary comments, from calling Muslims “savages” to describing Islam as a “cancer.” She has also promoted conspiracy theories about various mass shootings. Amid these controversies, Loomer has remained a vocal supporter of Donald Trump, who has publicly praised her as “terrific” and “very special.”

In April 2023, The New York Times reported that Trump considered giving Loomer a role in his campaign, though this did not materialize. Nevertheless, she continues to be an outspoken figure within far-right circles and has attacked Kamala Harris, questioning whether she is “Black or Indian” in a racially charged critique.

RFK Jr. dropping out of the race help Trump?

OK So rumor has it that following a controversy filled campaign that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has ran and his poll numbers compared to Trump are reportedly planning to suspend their presidential bid. He is considering endorsing former President Donald Trump and reportedly hopeful that he might secure the position of Trump’s health secretary if he wins. Kennedy was an environmental lawyer known for his work cleaning up the Hudson River with a storied last name who in recent years has become known for spreading conspiracy theories about medicine, including vaccines and anti-depressants. He used the popularity he gained as an anti-vaxxer during the pandemic to briefly challenge President Joe Biden in the Democratic primary before announcing an independent bid for president in October 2023.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Address to the Nation https://t.co/Wf4xt12GSX

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) August 23, 2024

He had been seen as a potential spoiler for both candidates, given his connection to the Democratic Kennedy dynasty as well as his embrace of the anti-establishment and anti-vaccine views held by certain segments of the GOP. He was polling around 10 percent nationally for the better part of 2024, and even higher in some swing state polls. But he struggled to get on the ballot in many states, though his campaign maintains that he has secured enough signatures to do so in all but Kentucky, Mississippi, Rhode Island, and Wyoming. And after Vice President Kamala Harris became the Democratic nominee, he seemed to hold less sway among voters who were turned off by Biden. His poll numbers consequently cratered to under 5 percent.

Despite Kennedy’s flagging national numbers, polling suggests his exit from the race could still help Trump, with whom he’s become decidedly more cozy in recent months. Trump wouldn’t have to win a lot of Kennedy’s potential voters to make a difference in key swing states; if the race is as close as it was in 2020, Trump gaining even a fraction of a percent from Kennedy could make the difference. Trump probably has the most to gain from Kennedy dropping out. Kennedy has increasingly endeared himself to Republican voters while struggling to get the same support among Democrats and independents. And polls conducted in recent months, including since Biden dropped out of the race, suggest that Trump would pick up more of Kennedy’s supporters. 

Any margin would likely be small but potentially significant and his endorsement of the GOP leader Donald Trump could be the tide turning moment in this election. The Republicans tend to see Kennedy more favorably than Democrats, and those with favorable views toward him tend to have more favorable opinions of Trump than of Harris, according to a July AP-NORC poll conducted before Biden dropped out. Several national polls conducted since Harris became the presumptive nominee have also tested a race between Harris, Trump, and Kennedy, as well as a two-way race between Harris and Trump. Trump tends to get a bigger bump than Harris when Kennedy is excluded. 

In an August Reuters/Ipsos poll of registered voters, for instance, Harris received 42 percent support, Trump 37 percent, and Kennedy 4 percent, while 15 percent supported another candidate, weren’t sure who they would support, or weren’t sure if they would vote at all. But when voters were pushed to select either Trump or Harris, 49 percent backed Harris and 47 percent Trump a 10 percentage point boost for Trump.

Trump had a similar edge with Kennedy voters in a July Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll. In a three-way contest, Harris earned 44 percent support, Trump 47 percent, and Kennedy 10 percent. In a head-to-head poll, Harris earned 48 percent and Trump 52 percent. It may seem like the advantage Trump gains when Kennedy is out of the picture is relatively small. But Biden won in 2020 by exceedingly narrow margins in six key battleground states; in Arizona, it was by less than 11,000 votes. On the margin, Kennedy’s supporters could make a difference, depending on where they’re distributed. In Arizona, for example, Kennedy is still polling at about 6 percent, according to The Hill’s polling average. 

Of course, he might not actually win that large a vote share if he decides to stay in the race; third-party candidates tend to poll much better than they actually perform on Election Day, when their supporters are confronted with the reality that their preferred candidate won’t win. But that vote share would have been more than enough to have swung the 2020 results in the other direction.

The same is true in other swing states, where polling suggests a very tight race. An early August New York Times/Siena survey of registered voters in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin found Harris leading Trump 46 percent to 43 percent when respondents were given all third-party candidates to choose from. When asked to pick between just Harris and Trump, the gap tightened to 48 and 46 percent, respectively. Those states are likely to be key, given their high electoral college vote count and in most scenarios, Harris would need all three to win. Harris’s entry into the race likely limits the impact of Kennedy’s exit While RFK Jr.s supporters may still be able to make an important impact on the margins, their power to drag the Democratic nominee’s polling down seems to have diminished substantially.

Before Harris became the nominee, there was a much larger than usual number of disaffected voters who didn’t like either Biden or Trump and just wanted someone anyone as an alternative. A theoretical no-name candidate as an alternative to Biden and Trump got about 10 percent in Ipsos polling conducted earlier this year.

Kennedy provided an alternative for a while. But when Harris stepped into the POTUS 2024 picture, that undermined his appeal at least among Democrats. “There were some wavering Democratic voters who just thought Biden was too old, or they didn’t like him, and Harris is just a more appealing candidate for those kinds of people,” said Kyle Kondik, managing editor of Sabato’s Crystal Ball at the University of Virginia Center for Politics.

Kondik said it’s possible that Biden may have ended up winning back those voters anyway if he had stayed in the race and had a typical post-Democratic National Convention bump. But at this point, Kondik said, he would not be surprised if the third-party vote share in the election ends up being about 2 percent of the electorate, as it was in 2012 and 2020. 

Before Harris became the nominee, political analysts were projecting that it would be closer to the nearly 6 percent share third parties got in 2016, which some analysts argued doomed Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s candidacy. “For all the talk about third parties in this election, a combination of the most prominent third-party candidate dropping out, in addition to the increased favor-ability of the two major party nominees, means that there’s just going to be less of a market for third party candidates,” he said.

Kennedy could make more of an impact as a surrogate for Trump. He could help the former president with certain demographics, such as young men who listen to prominent personalities such as Joe Rogan, who has praised Kennedy. But the Trump campaign might also be wary of attaching itself to Kennedy’s brand: If the brain worm and the bear incident weren’t enough, he has been disavowed by members of his own famous family and now peddles conspiracy theories not just about the Covid-19 vaccine, but his father’s killer, 5G cell phone transmission, fraud in the 2004 election, and more. “The Democratic refrain against Trump and his running mate JD Vance is that they’re ‘weird,’” Kondik said. “Kennedy doesn’t make them less weird.” This from a person who supports boys bathrooms with Tampons, Abortions until 9 months, Drag Queen reading hour with Elementary kids... 

Weird? Because they're loving husband, fathers, and want to make this country the best it can be. Weird because Trump, Vance, and RFK Jr love our country and want to help our Citizens and not illegal criminals. 

Yeah we should be as weird as Trump, Vance, RFK Jr... We need more weird people like that and less brain dead morons like Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Barrack & Mike Obama, Bill & The She devil known as Hillary Clinton. Oh and rest of the liberal tards in Congress, Senate and voting class.

Michelle Obama Gas-Lighting the blacks again!

So the artist known as the former first lady Mike... I mean Michelle Obama sent a what could only be described as a racially motivated and gas-lighting message to black Americans that voting in the November elections is “critical” to protecting their “freedom.” This from a man.. Woman who's party which include her husband the guy who was born in Kenya who illegally took the White house and who with the current sock puppet in place in Joe Biden are currently working hard to subvert our freedoms to vote, speak, do our normal lives and above all targeting political rival Donald Trump on a bunch of fake charges to send him to prison like if this was a banana republic 3rd world country. These leftist have some nerve but with the grand cojones this man has Mike said that “Juneteenth is all about celebrating our collective freedom and fighting to protect it,” Obama said in a video posted on X. Damn hypocrite and didn't these people all say at one time they hated Elon for buying Twitter or X and would be leaving there? Anyways.

He... She said “Our power, our rights, and even our planet are on the ballot this year,” Obama stated. And I agree for once... But it's because she knows THEY on the left are the ones which are doing the damage and she's telling us this is what they are striving for. They are the ones who want to destroy this country and bring in their Marxist/communist views. But her disgusting behavior and words continued with “So, now is the time to think about how you’re going to make your voice heard in this election.” And here is where it gets funny as this clear desperate message comes as recent polling shows that former President Donald Trump may be on the verge of capturing a historic number of votes from black Americans. Cause people of all walks of life are being RED PILLED and waking up from the leftist, lying sack or shit BLUE pill which has kept them in the MATRIX like Coma all their lives. This is terrifying to liberals as your ignorance is how they continue to stay in power and do the damages they have done and will continue.

The former first lady established the voter registration and engagement organization “When We All Vote” in 2018, and pushed her 22 million followers on X to visit the group’s website. “Get yourself registered to vote, and then text three friends to do the same,” she said. “Do not sit on the sidelines this year, because this is a critical moment for all of us.”

During a January interview on Jay Shetty’s “On Purpose” podcast, Obama put out another over-the-top call to action, claiming she was “terrified about what could possibly happen” like more people going to find out how her and her husband are behind all these Trump cases and are the ones running the government with Biden as their mentally weak sock puppet... This election that will likely feature a rematch between Trump and President Joe Biden again terrifies them all. “Because our leaders matter,” she said and once again she's right this is why we the "PEOPLE" are turning away from the left and going towards to supporting Trump for president. Because our leaders matter" and Joe Biden is a disaster.

“Who we select, who speaks for us, who holds that bully pulpit it affects us in ways that sometimes I think people take for granted.” Yeah a President who's a MAN And is an Alpha Male results in respect, power and strength on a global scale something we don't currently have with Creepy "PEDO PETE" as his kids call him cause he likes to touch kids, and well his own daughter said that Joe would molest her in the shower as a kid growing up. Remember this was on her diary and this was CONFIRMED as FACT... This is not me or a conspiracy. This is well known and JOE had the FBI raid illegally the "Project Veritas" office to bring it back to them and sweep under the rug. This happened folks and this is who the Obama duo and the left are pushing to continue in office. A Rapist, Pedophile, father of a crackhead who is a racist and wrote crime bills in the 80's and 90's targeting minorities. Has been using racist language all his life including saying black kids are roaches, and going as far as saying black men who use drugs should be locked up so they don't attack his mother or kids with a baseball bat. This was in congress... 

In March, Obama’s office confirmed again that she “will not be running for president,” as many had speculated she would amid disturbingly low poll numbers for Biden. This is a good thing because if she ran it would make it harder to fight her in debates as she is more clear minded, can follow their script better than dementia JOE! But she being of color can also say "RACIST" as anything or "MiSOGYNIST" because he's now a woman. Or whatever Joan River once said about Mike... Err Michelle. But Mich here continued by saying that “As former first lady (thats not the punchline.. wait for it!) Michelle Obama has expressed several times over the years, she will not be running for president,” Crystal Carson, director of communications for Obama’s office, told NBC News at the time. 

On Juneteenth, we celebrate our freedom, our resilience, and our progress. Today we're honoring all the Black folks who came before us – who helped build our country with their bare hands – who marched and fought to do everything they could to build a better future for us all.… pic.twitter.com/NmdjgcUK3t

— Michelle Obama (@MichelleObama) June 19, 2024

She said that “Mrs. Obama supports President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris’ re-election campaign,” she added. But that hasn’t stopped some from speculating that the former first lady will eventually enter the race. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, predicted in September that “the Democrat kingmakers [will] jettison Joe Biden and parachute in Michelle Obama” at the Democratic convention in August. Trump has been polling better with blacks and Hispanics for about over a year now. According to a new survey from Rasmussen Reports in April, the prospective GOP nominee took a double-digit lead over Biden among likely Hispanic voters, as Black and Asian Americans also appear to be shifting more towards the Republican Party. Overall, Trump is leading Biden 49-41 percent, which is the same as the pollster’s survey of likely voters last month, the Washington Examiner reported.

The outlet added: But this time, Rasmussen highlighted the gap in Hispanic voters that favors Trump. The pollster said Latinos back Trump over Biden, 48%-37%. That is a significant change from 2020, when Hispanics backed Biden 59%-38%, according to Pew statistics. In 2020, Biden also won Asian voters, and that margin has shifted. In 2020 he won Asians by a margin of 72%-28%, Pew said. Rasmussen now shows Trump leading 39%-36%. In the last election, Biden also did well with black voters, 92%-8%. Rasmussen showed Biden’s lead cut to 48%-39%. Democrats are concerned about the huge shift from 2020 as they need a big minority advantage to win, although those gaps are expected to turn in Biden’s favor as the election nears, the Examiner added. In addition, Trump is polling better among self-described Independents. “Trump benefits from both stronger partisan intensity and a double-digit advantage among independent voters,” the Rasmussen analysis noted. “In a head-to-head matchup with Biden, Trump gets 83% of Republican votes, compared to Biden’s 74% among Democrats.

Man Dies After Setting Himself on Fire Outside Trump Trial

Some of you I'm sure heard the news about the man who set himself on fire recently outside the trial of Donald Trump. Now we have the story as reported by the EPOCH Times... Check it out.

 

[Epoch Times] The man who set himself on fire outside a Manhattan courthouse where former President Donald Trump’s so-called hush money trial was proceeding has died from his injuries, police said. Max Azzarello, a 37-year-old resident of St. Augustine, Florida, carried out the act of self-immolation on Friday afternoon in Collect Pond Park, located across the street from the courthouse that has been a gathering point for demonstrators and media outlets covering jury selection for the trial. He threw a stack of pamphlets in the air before pulling out a canister, soaking himself in a liquid police believe was an “accelerant” and setting himself on fire in front of horrified witnesses.

Emergency responders were quick to arrive and put the blaze out, but the man suffered severe burns as he was rushed to the hospital. Hours after being admitted to a burn unit, he was declared dead. The New York Police Department said they do not believe the incident has anything to do with President Trump’s trial, although it did raise concerns over the security in the area. In a press briefing, Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey told reporters that the NYPD will review security protocol because of the “gravity of the event going on,” referring to the high-profile trial.

“We’re very concerned,” Mr. Maddrey said, noting that Mr. Azzarello didn’t breach any security checkpoints in accessing the park, given that it is a public space. “Of course we’re going to look at everything,” the police chief said. “We’re going to reassess our security with our federal partners.” A self-proclaimed “investigative researcher,” Mr. Azzarello traveled to New York City earlier in the week from Florida without his family knowing, according to the police. In the days leading to his self-inflammation, Mr. Azzarello appeared to have been protesting in front of the courthouse against political leaders from both sides of the aisle. He allegedly drove a vehicle emblazoned with a phrase that repeatedly shows up in his writings—”fascist coup”—and featured the name of his Substack blog, “Ponzi Papers.”

In a nearly 3,000-word rambling manifesto, Mr. Azzarello said that he carried out the extreme act to “draw attention to an urgent and important discovery.” His Substack manifesto directs outrage to a wide array of subjects, ranging from cryptocurrency, New York University, “The Simpsons,” the Clinton family, and the U.S. government and its allies. “We are victims of a totalitarian con, and our own government (along with many of their allies) is about to hit us with an apocalyptic fascist world coup,” he told his readers. “These claims sound like fantastical conspiracy theory, but they are not. They are proof of conspiracy.” Describing what he called a “Ponzi scheme,” Mr. Azzarello claimed that the Democrat-Republican adversary “has been entirely manufactured.” Ever since the 1996 election that saw former President Bill Clinton’s victory, he claimed, presidential candidates of the rival parties had been secretly collaborating, merely “acting as characters that are against one another” in a way akin to scripted wrestling matches.

“Both parties are run by financial criminals whose only goals are to divide, deceive, and bleed us dry,” he wrote. “They divide the public against itself and blame the other party while everything gets worse and more expensive and handful of people take all the money.” In addition, Mr. Azzarello claimed he discovered that “elites” have been funneling “trillions of dollars in stolen cash through the stock market” to create “the largest stock-market anomaly in history.” He claimed that the U.S. government “unleashed COVID on the world” to “explain the massive anomaly.” In the pamphlet he threw out before setting himself on fire, Mr. Azzarello said his goal was to abolish the government and replace it with one that “serves all.” The NYPD has dismissed the pamphlets as “propaganda-based” material. “The pamphlets appear to be propaganda-based, almost a conspiracy theory type of pamphlet,” NYPD Chief of Detectives Joseph Kenny told reporters. “Some information in regards to a Ponzi scheme, and the fact that some of our local educational institutes are fronts for the mob.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. forming a new party?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who I think is a good guy and would make a good President but his main problem is his voice and I mean that literally... Not his words or message but his actual voice.

While he's got zero chance of winning in 2024 he is trying to form a new party to help get on the ballot in six states for 2024. IF Anything the man is persistant. Sadly he's hard to listen to but he's got a great mind which is a sad issue for someone of his caliber, and background. But these are facts. But while he's trying to get in several states in an effort to get on the ballot in those states with fewer signatures than would otherwise be needed Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s presidential campaign announced Tuesday he is working to create a new political party the "We The People party".

The campaign said it is forming the parties in some states because “the party ballot access requires fewer signatures (than running as an individual candidate) and is therefore the most direct path to ballot access in those states.” At least two of those states require party registration to get on the ballot, according to the New York Times, meaning Kennedy Jr. will need to get about 75,000 voters in California to register with the party in order to gain ballot access, and about 770 voters to do so in Delaware.

His campaign said overall the political party route will reduce the total number of signatures he needs to get on the ballot in every state by about 330,000. That’s how many states Kennedy Jr. has already qualified to be on the ballot in, according to the New York Times. Kennedy Jr. collected the 1,000 required signatures in Utah earlier this month.

Kennedy Jr. began his presidential run as a Democratic candidate last April, but switched to run as an independent candidate in October abandoning his family’s long history with the Democratic Party, after attracting much of his support from far right online circles. After initially launching his campaign as a Democrat, though, Kennedy Jr. criticized both parties, saying their leaders are corrupt, as is the two-party system as a whole. A longshot candidate for the presidential race this year, he has also spent years promoting conspiracy theories about things ranging from Covid-19 and the efficacy of vaccines generally to alleging that the wrong person could have been convicted of killing his father.

Kennedy Jr. pulls in about 15% support in three way polling with President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump on the ballot, according to the latest RealClearPolitics polling average.

Judge will Hold Hearing on Allegations of DA Fani Willis’s ‘Improper’ Use of Funds + Affair

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee indicated a hearing on what one attorney termed “scandalous” allegations surrounding the district attorney’s relationship with a prosecutor would be held mid-February.

During a hearing the Georgia Judge let it known that he will be holding motion hearings every Friday for the next several weeks in the case Fulton County possible case against D.A Fani Willis. Yes the same one who is prosecuting former President Donald Trump for his constitutional right to challenge the 2020 election results.

The President Trump and 14 codefendants have been charged with violating the state’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and have been accused of operating a criminal conspiracy in their election challenge efforts. Remember this is a witch haunt because all Trump did was to ask them to make sure all votes were accounted for and make sure that they look into the possible rigging done. Like we saw in the footage of people pulling out bags in the middle of the night when all other people were told to go home that they were closed for the night.

We saw on the CCTV there were people who stayed behind and they pulled out secret bags from under the tables in the room and jammed those fake ballots which we now know all were in favor of Joe "BIG GUY" Biden. So we know they helped rig the election in 2020 from these things the left & the M.S.M refuses to admit happened.

So we have Trump being on trial for questioning the events while Stacey Abrams who lost multiple times and has yet to ever admit she lost in a clean election! Only thing different is she's a radical leftists who has a sister who is a Judge, and she's a fat black woman so if you say anything against her it's a tool for the left to be able to attack you with such words as "White Supremacist, racist, misogynists, and so on.

Earlier this week, defendant Michael Roman, a former GOP strategist, made huge accusations of the “improper” use of funds in the district attorney’s office. So this made people see for themselves how corrupt this woman is. He alleged that Nathan Wade, an attorney for the prosecution who has argued at every hearing in the case, had taken lavish vacations with Ms. Willis using state funds. Mr. Wade is currently married and seeking divorce.

Mr. Wade is a partner at his own, private law firm, and would be paid by the district attorney’s office after his appointment as special prosecutor, which the motion alleges is close to $1 million in legal fees. Mr. Wade has been paid at a rate of $250 per hour, and around $650,000 for this case.

Mr. Roman also alleged the funds for the case investigation had been obtained “to clear the COVID backlog” but not used for those purposes. In a 100-plus page filing, Mr. Roman argued this was grounds for dismissal of his charges and dismissal of the district attorney and her team.

Prosecutors have not yet filed a response to the motion but said they would do so. Judge McAfee said a hearing on this motion would not be scheduled until after the court has received the response, and the earliest would likely be mid-February.

In the court hearing, Steve Sadow, attorney for Donald Trump, asked for the option to adopt the motion at a later date. He said he presently had no foundation for the “scandalous and salacious” allegations, the first of which was made public through the court filing, and would certainly wait to see the district attorney’s response filing before making a decision to adopt Mr. Roman’s filing. The judge had no issue with him doing so.

In the court filing, Mr. Roman only cites “sources” and does not provide evidence of Mr. Wade and Ms. Willis’s relationship or proof of such vacation expenditure. “Admittedly, this is a bold allegation considering it is directed to one of the most powerful people in the State of Georgia, the Fulton County District Attorney,” the filing reads.

“Nevertheless, the district attorney’s fame and power do not change the fact that she decided to appoint as the special prosecutor a person with whom she had a personal relationship and who is now leading the day-to-day prosecution of this case.”



Mr. Roman argued that public records don’t show that Ms. Willis obtained county approval to appoint Mr. Wade as special prosecutor, and that he has sealed records in his ongoing divorce case. He argued this was “indefensible conduct” and thus created an “irreparable defect” in the indictment.

Ms. Willis is already under investigation by House Republicans, who have alleged election interference and “colluding” with the Jan. 6 Select Committee. Jan. 12, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) sent a letter to Mr. Wade demanding materials and as part of oversight of “politically motivated prosecutions by state and local officials.”

Mr. Jordan had previously asked Ms. Willis to provide documents and correspondence as part of an investigation, arguing her actions have indicated the case was politically motivated against President Trump, the front runner for the Republican Party nominee. The committee is asking Mr. Wade for documents that show the district attorney’s coordination “with other politically motivated investigations and prosecutions and the potential misuse of federal funds.”

“According to a recent court filing, you have been paid more than $650,000 at the rate of $250 per hour to serve as an ‘Attorney Consultant’ and later a ‘Special Assistant District Attorney’ in the unprecedented investigation and prosecution of the former President and other former federal officials. This filing also alleges that while receiving a substantial amount of money from Fulton County, you spent extravagantly on lavish vacations with your boss, Ms. Willis,” the letter reads, referencing Mr. Roman’s motion.

Mr. Wade’s invoices include expenses incurred to interview investigators with the Jan. 6 Select Committee and hours of interviews at the White House. Politico recently reported on the district attorney’s office meeting with the Jan. 6 Select Committee during their investigation, and Mr. Jordan asked Mr. Wade to provide materials to show whether politically motivated collusion had occurred.

Mr. Sadow had previously requested materials from the district attorney’s office which came out of this meeting. During the Jan. 12 hearing, prosecutors confirmed that some notes taken were work product and not subject to discovery, but any video evidence viewed has since been made public.

Did Judge Engoron's Wife Post Anti-Trump Messages on X?

OK So we now have the corrupt Judge Arthur Engermoron's wife has been at the center of allegations that she posted a number of explicit and derogatory claims about Donald Trump, allegations she has denied but is there merit to these claims? Dawn Engoron was accused by pro-Trump conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer this week of posting photos and posts deriding the former president, including illustrations of Trump in jail and one post that included the words "F*** TRUMP." This goes with the Judges own views on Trump, and those of Latisha James. Now remember these people are all liars, and con artists trying to throw an innocent Trump into a mix where he would lose all his money, and keep him from running for President in 2024. So is this another lie by the Judge, his wife, and the leftist fatass Tish James?

Judge Engoron ruled in September that Trump, his adult sons, their businesses, and executives committed fraud without any proof, and claims to the contrary by the same banks that these charges claim he defrauded are on Trumps side, and testified as we reported earliar that he (TRUMP) did nothing wrong. He's now deciding on six other accusations, including falsifying business records, insurance fraud, and conspiracy claims in a $250 million lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Which is NOT her job to do, and is crossing the line of her job into bringing fake charges against Trump. The case in NY is based on pure lies by the leftist puppets James, and Engermoron. While Loomer's claims are based on content she had a right to post it just further shows that she and the rest of these idiots are all brainwashed anti American losers. Her allegations were noticed by Trump, who has reposted and promoted them via Truth Social. Loomer has continued sharing her allegations about Ms. Engoron, and they claim it's despite seemingly no credible evidence to support what she's said.

Donald J. Trump
ReTruthed

Laura Loomer@LoomerReport

WATCH: Engorons EXPOSED! I caught Dawn Marie Engoron @dm_sminxs Tweeting out vitriolic anti-Trump posts while her husband Judge Art Engoron is overseeing active litigation against President @realDonaldTrump in New York.… pic.twitter.com/sdywPbJSUL

— Donald J. Trump Posts From His Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) November 29, 2023

This from people who have a trial based on no victims, no crimes actually being committed, and all based to smear, and destroy the leading political rival of Joe "Pedo" Biden and his Crime syndicate. Conservative activist Loomer posted on X, formerly Twitter, on November 28, 2023, claiming Dawn Engoron had been "attacking" her on her X account "for my expose about her corrupt husband who is overseeing the civil fraud trial of President Trump." Loomer claimed the account @dm_sminxs belonged to Dawn Engoron, but offered no evidence to prove this. But ironically the account was taken offline as these alligations became public... Hmmm I wonder why if it's NOT her account? Why is the account no say "This account doesn’t exist?"

She stated on Truth Social: "I have Uncovered screenshots from the X account of Dawn Marie Engoron, the wife of Leftist NYC Judge Arthur Engoron, who is overseeing the civil fraud against President Trump that shows that she has been posting attacks on Trump from her account @c as the trial is ongoing. "This is incredible bias. On or around November 7th, she posted tweets in which she said 'F*** TRUMP'. She posted photoshopped pics of President Trump in an orange jump suit, she attacked me during my Live show a few weeks ago for exposing her husband, and she is openly attacking President Trump's lawyer Alina Habba. Loomer's post included what appeared to be screen grabs from an account @dm_sminxs, with the username Dawn Marie.

One of the posts included a photo of what looked like an older person spray painting an obscenity about Trump, a photo of what looked like Trump without hair in a prison jumpsuit, and two other illustrations of Trump in a prison setting. The account has since been deleted from Twitter, although archive results show it was created in May 2021. Of the archived pages available, the user @dm_sminxs had been re-posting anti-Trump content earlier this year. There is nothing in the archived posts that shows they were written by Dawn Engoron. The only similarity is the name of the account holder.

There is nothing that indicates the account belongs to Engoron. Loomer has continued to claim that the posts are authentic, posting on Friday, without any new evidence, that "Those are 100% the posts from the account of Dawn Marie Engoron, the wife of Judge Arthur Engoron." There is nothing that indicates the account belongs to Engoron. Newsweek has contacted Loomer via Twitter for comment. The justice's wife has told Newsweek directly that she did not send the messages on Twitter. "I do not have a Twitter account. This is not me. I have not posted any anti Trump messages," she said. While Newsweek has been unable to verify whether the account does belong to Dawn Engoron, there is no compelling evidence that shows it's hers either.

Loomer has not shared any other content apart from screengrabs from the account. None of this content sufficiently supports her claim. Which doesn't matter as both Tish James, and Judge Engermoron are both on record with ANTI TRUMP attacks themselves. And both lied about it. On both them it's been discovered they both also lied about not being Anti Trump. On James own side she said publically she did not run on a basis that she was after Trump! But we have her on record and video contradicting her own statements which makes the whole thing very laughable.

The left claims that material elsewhere that indicates Dawn Engoron's political views are not around but if she takes the account offline when she's busted only screen grabs can be used as proof unless a certain Elon Musk can somehow bring these back to life, and for all to see. The New York Office of Court Administration has backed up Engoron, (Shocking right?) telling CBS News "Justice Engoron's wife has not sent social media posts regarding the former president. They are not hers. She does not have an X, formerly Twitter, account." Despite the lack of evidence, Trump reposted Loomer's allegations, referring to Dawn Engoron as "Judge Engoron's Trump Hating wife" claiming that she and others had "taken over control of the New York State Witch Hunt Trial aimed at me, my family, and the Republican Party."

Trump reposted some of the posts Loomer alleged were Engoron's, including a mocked-up image of the former president in a prison cell, and another of him in an orange jumpsuit mopping, with the caption: "He'll NEVER be in the WHITE HOUSE again. He's headed for the BIG HOUSE." "Yet another from Judge Engoron's Wife. This Trial, which should never have been allowed to be brought, has turned out to be an embarrassment to the New York State Judicial System," Trump wrote while sharing the post of him sitting in a jail cell. Trump commented about Engoron's wife as he had a gagging order reinstated against him on Thursday, barring him from commenting on court personnel.

The Associated Press reported that Judge Engoron intends to enforce the ruling "rigorously and vigorously," while Trump's attorney, Chris Kise, commented that the reinstatement was "a tragic day for the rule of law." But I could give a F'in you know what myself and we will post it here on "Pure Solid News" as the TRUTH needs to be shared, and told to all. They can't stop the facts from coming out. They can only lie, and cover their own mistakes. Like the idiots they are they keep getting trapped in blunder after blunder when it comes to this political hit job against Trump.

Donald J. Trump Fills docs to have DC interference case quashed!

POTUS 45 Donald J Trump was charged in August under a four-count, 45-page (45 Pages 45 President! Coincidance?) Indictment that accuses him of conspiring to defraud the U.S. by preventing Congress from certifying Democrat President Joe Biden's so called victory and to deprive voters of their right to a fair election. Which is actually what Biden did in actuality as well rational people know by now. So the Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith is leading the prosecution team. "The core conduct alleged in the indictment relating to the presentation of alternate electors had a historical basis that dates back to 1800 and spans at least seven other elections," now Trump is seeking to have his Washington, D.C. election interference case quashed, calling it a "vindictive prosecution." Much of his submission, filed early on Tuesday, hangs on whether alternative electors are a criminal conspiracy or a symbolic act of defiance that is rooted in American history. Trump arrives to Trump Tower on October 23, 2023 in New York City. He is now seeking to have his federal indictment quashed, based on historical precedent. Much of his submission, filed again Tuesday.



"There are no other prosecutions in American history relating to these types of activities. The allegations in the indictment involve constitutionally authorized activities by President Trump as Commander in Chief, as well as speech and expressive conduct by the First Amendment." and it gies ib tge say that "Given this context, it is no surprise that in the months following the 2020 election, senior government officials rejected an investigation of President Trump as unfounded and potentially unconstitutional," the filing stated.



Former U.S. President Donald Trump arrives to Trump Tower on October 23, 2023 in New York City. He is now seeking to have his federal indictment quashed, based on historical precedent. Donald Trump is seeking to have his Washington, D.C. election interference case quashed, calling it a "vindictive prosecution." Much of his submission, filed early on Tuesday, hangs on whether alternative electors are a criminal conspiracy or a symbolic act of defiance that is rooted in American history.



Trump was charged in August under a four-count, 45-page indictment that accuses him of conspiring to defraud the U.S. by preventing Congress from certifying Democrat President Joe Biden's victory and to deprive voters of their right to a fair election. Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith is leading the prosecution team.



"The core conduct alleged in the indictment relating to the presentation of alternate electors had a historical basis that dates back to 1800 and spans at least seven other elections," Trump's application to quash the charges stated. "There are no other prosecutions in American history relating to these types of activities. The allegations in the indictment involve constitutionally authorized activities by President Trump as Commander in Chief, as well as speech and expressive conduct by the First Amendment."



"Given this context, it is no surprise that in the months following the 2020 election, senior government officials rejected an investigation of President Trump as unfounded and potentially unconstitutional," the filing stated. "Expressive conduct" in First Amendment law has long been used to protect non-verbal free speech, such as an anti-war student wearing a black armband to school or Jehovah Witness children refusing to salute the American flag in class.



Trump is now saying that the alternate electors who signed off a Trump victory across the U.S. were engaged in symbolic free speech to show their disapproval of Biden and the way that the election was run. Edward B. Foley, a constitutional law professor at Ohio State University, said that there is a long history of alternate electors in American politics that stretches back hundreds of years. Writing for the policy think tank, Just Security, Foley said that Trump supporters signing off on his supposed victory in seven battleground states was "a fool's errand, since there never was a chance that Congress was going to recognize Trump as the winner." Former U.S. President Donald Trump arrives to Trump Tower on October 23, 2023 in New York City. He is now seeking to have his federal indictment quashed, based on historical precedent.



Former U.S. President Donald Trump arrives to Trump Tower on October 23, 2023 in New York City. He is now seeking to have his federal indictment quashed, based on historical precedent.
Trump is seeking to have his Washington, D.C. election interference case quashed, calling it a "vindictive prosecution." Much of his submission, filed early on Tuesday, hangs on whether alternative electors are a criminal conspiracy or a symbolic act of defiance that is rooted in American history. Trump was charged in August under a four-count, 45-page indictment that accuses him of conspiring to defraud the U.S. by preventing Congress from certifying Democrat President Joe Biden's victory and to deprive voters of their right to a fair election. Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith is leading the prosecution team.



"The core conduct alleged in the indictment relating to the presentation of alternate electors had a historical basis that dates back to 1800 and spans at least seven other elections," Trump's application to quash the charges stated. "There are no other prosecutions in American history relating to these types of activities. The allegations in the indictment involve constitutionally authorized activities by President Trump as Commander in Chief, as well as speech and expressive conduct by the First Amendment."



"Given this context, it is no surprise that in the months following the 2020 election, senior government officials rejected an investigation of President Trump as unfounded and potentially unconstitutional," the filing stated. "Expressive conduct" in First Amendment law has long been used to protect non-verbal free speech, such as an anti-war student wearing a black armband to school or Jehovah Witness children refusing to salute the American flag in class.

Trump is now saying that the alternate electors who signed off a Trump victory across the U.S. were engaged in symbolic free speech to show their disapproval of Biden and the way that the election was run. Edward B. Foley, a constitutional law professor at Ohio State University, said that there is a long history of alternate electors in American politics that stretches back hundreds of years. Writing for the policy think tank, Just Security, Foley said that Trump supporters signing off on his supposed victory in seven battleground states was "a fool's errand, since there never was a chance that Congress was going to recognize Trump as the winner."



As Foley points out, Trump's Vice President, Mike Pence, acting as Senate president, would not even open the envelope that contained the confirmation from the alternative electors. "Mike Pence, as Senate president, would not even let these pro-Trump submissions be opened in the joint session of Congress because, without any claim of any backing from any part of their state's government, they could not be acknowledged as even asserting to be official electoral votes entitled to be considered by Congress," Foley wrote.



So was the action of Trump's supporters merely symbolic free speech and is there, as his lawyers claimed in their submissions, a long historic precedent? Foley notes that Florida was hotly contested in the 1876 election between Republican candidate, Rutherford Hayes, and Democrat, Samuel Tilden. Florida's attorney general, a Democrat, purported to certify Tilden the winner of the state. On the same day, however, Republican electors in Florida voted for Hayes, backed by a certification from the state's canvassing board.



Later, Florida's judiciary and legislature would act to undo the canvassing board's certification. There were no indictments of any of those involved as it was considered a legal dispute. "In South Carolina, by contrast, there was no one with any colorable claim of official authority in a position to certify Tilden the winner. Still, Democrats there were claiming that he had won" and still "submitted their spurious electoral votes to the Senate president". "None of these South Carolina individuals (as far as I know from my research) were criminally investigated or prosecuted for making this assertion," Foley wrote, noting that a similar dispute occurred in Vermont in 1876.



Other disputes occurred throughout American history, such as both sides claiming to sign off on the winning candidate in Hawaii in the 1960 election between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. Foley said that such acts, done by both Democrats and Republicans, are distinct from cases of forgery, which have occurred in elections in the past. "Openly asserting that one is the duly appointed elector of state, even when that claim is utterly without merit[...]is to make an argument about one's status under the law. It is not an attempt to dupe recipients with counterfeit papers," he writes. Judging from Tuesday's court submissions, that is the logic that will get Trump and his co-accused released from the election interference charges.

Look Judge Tanya Chutkan you can't "Gag the TRUMP!"

So this so called gag order aimed at restraining Donald Trump for putting the judge overseeing his federal election interference case in her place! This also seems that the Judge is now in a tricky and sticky position. She must balance the need to protect the integrity of the legal proceedings against the First Amendment rights of a presidential candidate to defend himself in public. OOPS! But of course things like LAWS, Rules, and the constituional rights to "SPEAK" is something the left doesn't like. They like Open Borders, Lies, doing massive drugs, and well there is a weird thing happening where there seems to be a whole lot of love for pedophiles from these people.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan will hear arguments Monday in Washington over whether Trump has gone too far with remarks such as calling prosecutors a “team of thugs” and one possible witness “a gutless pig.” Watching the case, and the other cases these libtards are putting Trump in well I would say not just is he justified for his comments but to be honest I would have said A LOT more and much worse. He's keeping it clean if you ask me.



While some say this might be the biggest test yet for Chutkan, hidding her biased has become clear from day one! She's a complete puppet and wants him in prison so it's underscoring the unprecedented complexities of prosecuting the former Republican president as the judge vows not to let political considerations guide her decisions. Ending the stream of Trump’s harsh language would make the case easier to manage. But among the difficult questions Chutkan must navigate is how any gag order might be enforced and how one could be fashioned that does not risk provoking Trump’s base and fueling his claims of political persecution as he campaigns to retake the White House in 2024 in which he doesn't just lead the rest of the GOP but Biden himself in every poll!



“She has to think about the serious risk that it’s not just his words that could trigger violence, but that she could play into the conspiracy theories that Trump’s followers tend to believe in, and that her act of issuing a gag order might trigger a very disturbing response,” said Catherine Ross said, a George Washington University law school professor.



“If we allow that to stop a judge from doing what is called for, that’s a big problem for rule of law. But on the other hand, if I were the judge, I would certainly be thinking about it,” she said. Short of issuing an order, Chutkan has already suggested that inflammatory comments could force her to move up the trial, now scheduled to begin in March, to guard against tainting the jury pool. Judges can threaten gag order violators with fines or jail time, but jailing a presidential candidate could prompt serious political blowback and pose logistical hurdles. It's not like this is a legit case anyway so while his rights have been violated from her, and the other people trying to take him to his death bed.



This Shitkan of a woman, who was nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama and is Jamaincan like VP Harris, isn’t the first judge to confront the consequences of Trump’s speech. The judge in his civil fraud trial in New York recently imposed a limited gag order prohibiting personal attacks against court personnel following a social media post that maligned the judge’s principal clerk.



Special counsel Jack Smith’s team envisions a broader order, seeking to bar Trump from making inflammatory and intimidating comments about lawyers, witnesses and others involved in the case that accuses the former president of illegally plotting to overturn his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden. Trump’s lawyers call it a “desperate effort at censorship” that would prevent Trump from telling his side of the story while campaigning. While Biden sells our country down to our enemies and with Obamas orders is literally killing our economy on purpose, and has set up proxy wars, got people LITERALLY killed! Order a strike in the past which killed school children, and these people called it a successfull strike. Oh and the LAPTOP IS REAL!!!



A complicating factor is that many of the potential witnesses in the case are themselves public figures. In the case of Trump’s vice president, Mike Pence is also running against Trump for the GOP nomination. That could open the door for Trump’s team to argue that he should be permitted to respond to public broadsides he sees on television or seek a competitive edge by denouncing a political rival for the White House. Burt Neuborne, a longtime civil liberties lawyer who challenged gag orders on behalf of defendants and lawyers in other cases, questioned whether a formal order was necessary because witness intimidation is already a crime and the court can guard against a tainted jury by carefully questioning prospective jurors before trial.



A gag order may also slow down the case because it’s likely Trump either violates it and the judge will want to punish him or Trump will challenge the order in advance, he said. “And so in some sense, you may be playing directly into his hands by essentially creating yet another mechanism for him to try to push this until after the 2024 election because this is exactly what needs to be done since these leftists are violating his civil rights with all these bogus puppets for Obama... So any gag order that she issues will eventually reach the Supreme Court,” Neuborne said. But Barbara McQuade, a former U.S. attorney in Michigan, said she believes the judge can issue a narrow enough order that withstands legal challenges and protects both the case and Trump’s abilities to campaign.



Especially in this case, where Donald Trump has made it apparent that he will say all kinds of facts since the Judge, and his cohorts are all sold out and want doom for the Donald and so they can say things about him but he can't say anything back and publically defend himself? Well more power to him! This so called judge, is about witnesses the power of words of truth when the public gets wind of how crooked this person is. McQuade, a University of Michigan Law School professor said “So in some ways she has, I think, a responsibility to act here.” Yeah she needs to remove herself from being the Judge and dismiss this case.



There is some limited precedent for restricting speech of political candidates who are criminal defendants. In one case, a federal appeals court in 1987 lifted a gag order on U.S. Rep. Harold Ford Sr., a Tennessee Democrat charged in a fraud case. Ford, who was ultimately acquitted, claimed the case brought under Republican President Ronald Reagan’s administration was racially and politically motivated.



Ford’s gag order prohibited him from even sharing his opinion of or discussing facts of the case. The court noted that Ford would soon be up for reelection and said the gag order would unfairly prevent him from responding to attacks from his political opponents and block his constituents from hearing the “views of their congressman on this issue of undoubted public importance.”



Another appeals court in 2000 upheld a gag order challenged by then-Louisiana Insurance Commissioner Jim Brown in a fraud case, noting the order allowed assertions of innocence and other general statements about the case. The court, however, also noted that the judge briefly lifted the gag order to avoid interfering with Brown’s reelection campaign, saying that the “urgency of a campaign, which may well require that a candidate, for the benefit of the electorate as well as himself, have absolute freedom to discuss his qualifications, has passed.”



Chutkan herself has experience with gag orders. In 2018, she imposed an order restricting the comments of lawyers in the case of Maria Butina, a Russian gun activist who pleaded guilty to working in America as a secret agent for Moscow. The order followed prosecutors’ admission that they had wrongly accused Butina of trading sex for access as well as public comments by her lawyer that Chutkan said had “crossed the line.”



The next year, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson imposed a gag order on Trump ally Roger Stone in his obstruction and witness tampering case after he posted a photo of judge with what appeared to be crosshairs of a gun. Though she warned she could jail him if he violated the order, she instead barred him from using social media months later after he again publicly disparaged the case against him.



But that order was in direct response to a specific action, said Bruce Rogow, Stone’s attorney in that case. He said he was dubious that Trump’s attacks, “while in very poor taste,” posed the kind of danger to merit a gag order. “Trump’s talk may be déclassé, but the First Amendment defends his right to present his distorted view of the world up to the point that he presents a true threat to people or the administration of justice. Not easy to measure,” Rogow wrote in an email. “Like obscenity, one knows it when you see it.”