Donald Trump 2014 Payment trophy... So where is the victim?

Check out this Trophy that was given by Deutsche Bank to Donald Trump because they were so proud of the Loan they made with him. They had the best Lawyers, the smartest Loan Officers, and were thrilled to do business with “TRUMP.” Interest was fully paid every month (no payment ever missed!), he never received a default notice, and if Interest came due on a weekend, he paid it on a Friday. 

THE LOAN WAS PAID OFF FAR AHEAD OF SCHEDULE! But, because of the Corrupt DOJ, FBI, and Racist New York State Attorney General Trump is in court and in a case with no Victims, there were only happy Bankers! But despite a PERFECT LOAN, he's being sued by the Incompetent, Radical Left New York State AG, Letitia “Peekaboo” James, under a Statute that was never used for this before, and where Trump is not even entitled to a Jury. 

A Liberal Democrat Judge, with all Trump Haters surrounding him, is going to make this very important decision. If he had a Jury, he would stand a better chance of actually having a chance to win, but regardless, this is a case that should never have been brought. 

YES FOLKS THIS IS ELECTION INTERFERENCE!

China owned (China Investment Corp, the Country’s Sovereign wealth Fund!), and very badly failing, Forbes “Magazine,” which lost most of its relevance long ago, and which knows less about Trump than Stormy Daniels (who doesn’t know him at all!) They took him off their Fake Forbes 400 list, just by a “whisker,” even though they know that he should be high up on that now very dated and discredited “antique.” 

They are working with the Racist and highly incompetent, job killing Attorney General of New York, Letitia “Peekaboo” James, who has allowed Murder and Violent Crime in the State to hit epidemic levels. China owned Forbes is a participant in the Election Interference Scam, and after what I have done to China, with hundreds of billions of dollars being paid to the USA, who can blame them? For years Forbes has attacked me with really dumb writers assigned to hit me hard, and I am now up 60 Points on the Republicans, and beating Crooked Joe by a lot. 

On the base, it reads: "Trump Old Post Office LLC," the amount of the loan, "$170,000,000," and the date, "July 23, 2014."

Aired on November 19, 1998. The Roseanne Show (1998)

#48 with Donald Trump, Michael Moore & Virginia Graham.

So much for Forbes & the cases against Trump being legit in anyway. We know these cases are just for the left to help with the election fraud they did in 2020, and plan again in 2024. The liars know no means even when proven to be a lie by them it's mostly useless when the DA, and JUDGE are both on the same page which is to drain TRUMP from his earnings though his business. 

Before the trial had even started remember the JUDGE ordered all of TRUMPS business license to be revoked and his properties taken. Wait he's now guilty until proven innocent? The case wasn't even started how can the judge do this? Clearly he's made up his mind before he even became this trials Judge, Jury and executioner. Might as well call him Judge Dreedgeron.

"They had the best Lawyers, the smartest Loan Officers, and were thrilled to do business with 'TRUMP,'" he said, speaking about himself in the third person. "Interest was fully paid every month (no payment ever missed!), never received a default notice, and if Interest came due on a weekend, I paid it on a Friday. THE LOAN WAS PAID OFF FAR AHEAD OF SCHEDULE!"

Trump, who described the loan he received from the bank as a "PERFECT LOAN" then went off on the Justice Department and the New York attorney general, saying that there were no "Victims" of his alleged misdeeds.

"There were only happy Bankers (sic)!" - Trump

This Is Probably Why AOC Is Under Investigation | Forbes Exclusive

 Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York is under investigation by the House Ethics Committee. 

AOC As she's better known from the now well hated "Fraud Squad" in congress might be in some deep poo! For showing up to a party in an expensive dress she shouldn't have been able too. Remember this pic folks?

The committee said it had received a referral from the Office of Congressional Ethics, a separate office that reviews misconduct allegations, on June 23. That means a majority of that body decided the matter was substantial enough to refer to the committee, which is chaired by Democratic Rep. Susan Wild of Pennsylvania.

They committee said the disclosure of the investigation was mandated by the panel's decision to extend the amount of time it's investigating the matter. It added that it had not made a judgement on whether an ethics violation had occurred. It also said it would "announce its course of action in this matter" next year after the 118th Congress convened.

The committee did not indicate why the congresswoman was under investigation, and in a statement to Insider, Lauren Hitt, her spokesperson, did not offer further details.

"The Congresswoman has always taken ethics incredibly seriously, refusing any donations from lobbyists, corporations, or other special interests," Hitt said. "We are confident that this matter will be dismissed."

It's possible that the investigation was spurred by a September 2021 complaint from the conservative American Accountability Foundation accusing the congresswoman of accepting an impermissible gift by attending the 2021 Met Gala, where the cost of attendance for many guests is $35,000. Ocasio-Cortez was invited to the event as a guest of the Met and did not pay for her ticket. 

The congresswoman notably wore a dress emblazoned with "TAX THE RICH" at the event. She was not permitted to keep the dress, Hitt told PolitiFact last year. Ocasio-Cortez has said she attended the event in her official capacity as a member of Congress and that lawmakers from New York were routinely invited. Rep. Carolyn Maloney, a fellow New York Democrat, has attended multiple Met Galas, and the Office of Congressional Ethics recently opened an investigation into whether Maloney solicited a ticket to the event in 2016. House rules state that members may not accept gifts, except under exemptions for widely attended events or charity functions.

The conservative group said Ocasio-Cortez's attendance violated those rules because the event was exclusive and run by Condé Nast, a for-profit media company.