Showing posts with label Socialists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Socialists. Show all posts

Friday, June 27, 2025

Republicans are calling to revoke Mamdani’s citizenship and deport him


Republicans are calling on President Donald Trump’s administration to revoke Zohran Mamdani’s citizenship and deport him from the country as the likely Democratic nominee for New York City’s next mayor endures a torrent of Islamophobic bigotry. The 33-year-old democratic socialist declared victory in the primary after former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo conceded the race on Tuesday evening. The New York Young Republican Club reacted to the primary results with a “call to action” on X. “The radical Zohran Mamdani cannot be allowed to destroy our beloved city of New York,” the group wrote. The group urged the president to invoke the Red Scare-era Communist Control Act to yank Mamdani’s citizenship and “promptly deport him.”

The club called on White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and Trump border czar Tom Homan to take action. “The time for action is now,” the group wrote. “New York is counting on you.” Following Mamdani’s victory, Miller claimed New York City is the “clearest warning yet of what happens to a society when it fails to control migration.” “The entire Democrat party is lining up behind the diehard socialist who wants to end all immigration enforcement and abolish the prison system entirely,” he added. Republican Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee referred to Mamdani as “little Muhammad” and said he’s “an antisemitic, socialist, communist who will destroy the great City of New York.”


“He needs to be DEPORTED. Which is why I am calling for him to be subject to denaturalization proceedings,” he added. Mamdani, who could become the city’s first Muslim and Indian-American mayor, won one of the first major Democratic primaries since the start of Trump’s second stint in the White House. His platform has largely focused on a growing affordability crisis, with plans for universal childcare, free buses, and a freeze on rent increases in rent-controlled units.

The administration claims Mamdani’s victory is the result of uncontrolled immigration as it pushes a mass deportation agenda. The NYYRC, founded in 1911, is a political and social club for New York Republicans between the ages of 18 and 40. Mamdani, born in Uganda in 1991, moved to New York along with his family at the age of seven in 1998 and became a naturalized U.S. citizen two decades later in 2018. The Communist Control Act was signed into law by President Dwight Eisenhower in 1954 during the Cold War. The legislation outlawed, in theory, the Communist Party in the United States and prohibited communists from attaining certain positions. But it was rarely enforced and faced a litany of legal challenges as a relic of the McCarthyism era.

Mamdani’s victory had some prominent Republicans cheering on the return of Sen. Joseph McCarthy’s Un-American Activities Committee. “New York City is on the verge of electing a socialist for mayor,” Sen. Mike Collins wrote. “Might be time to bring back the committee.” Trump also slammed Mamdani on Truth Social on Wednesday, calling him a “Communist Lunatic.” Incumbent New York Mayor Eric Adams is set to run as an independent in November’s general election after he faced corruption charges, which the Department of Justice subsequently dropped. Adams, who has rejected all allegations of wrongdoing, has faced accusations from Democrats of a quid pro quo with the Trump administration to facilitate its immigration agenda.

The group Republicans for Renewal responded to NYYRC’s “call to action,” saying that “communist radical Zohran Mamdani should be remigrated as soon as possible.” Republican New York councilwoman Vickie Paladini wrote on June 2 that it would be “insane” for voters to elect someone who hasn’t been a citizen for more than 10 years, “much less a radical leftist who actually hates everything about the country and is here specifically to undermine everything we've ever been about. “Deport,” she said.

A spokesperson for the councilwoman subsequently added that she “stands by this statement” and accused the state assemblyman of being eligible for removal from the country “due to his involvement in multiple antisemitic and far-left organizations in college,” according to Newsweek. Mamdani has repeatedly rejected allegations of antisemitism against him and has denounced rising acts of antisemitic abuse. He struck back at Paladino, writing that like nearly 40 percent of New Yorkers, “I wasn’t born in this country.” “I moved here at age 7. It's my home. And I’m proud to be a citizen, which means standing up for our Constitution,” he added. “Councilmember Paladino might consider reading it.”

Thursday, November 14, 2024

How Liberals really feel about LATINOS!


Here is how these liberal meltdowns are going since the Trump Re-Election! This is from INFO WARS and It's hilarious and myself as a Latino I hope that this does keep going viral and this disgusting woman is canceled from her work, and all her friends leave her behind... She is a horrible example of the way America is headed with what has been brain washing our country.


One thing she forgets the "LATINOS" who like myself voted for TRUMP also come from places like CUBA, and Venezuela and countries which are bad due to the same garbage she loves and endorses and we got here legally and got the right to vote the right way. Trump doesn't want to deport myself I'm a USA Citizen Born in CUBA! 

He is after ILLEGALS who have criminal and mental issues who have been coming in during the last 4 years thanks to this OPEN BORDER Crap the BIDEN/HARRIS white house allowed. But this fact is just too much for that dumb libtard woman and anyone making the claim that TRUMP Will deport all Latinos... Such idiotic language has no place in our country... These lies just to smear TRUMP is outrageous and she needs to be exposed!

Thursday, August 29, 2019

Nasty Nancy Pelosi, Nadler & Co Caught In Major Lie!

So in the Impeachment Proceedings, Court Docs Show They Started Before Mueller Turned In the infamous Report which showed the President did nothing wrong, and that the left hung their hopes would crucify Trump.

Speculation, Analysis & Opinion of Kirsters B| House Judiciary Committee Democrats indicated in a Monday court filing that they have been working on an impeachment probe of President Donald Trump since before special counsel Robert Mueller even submitted his report. This seems to contradict previous comments made by committee chairman New York Democrat Jerry Nadler and California Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Earlier this month, Nadler claimed that “formal impeachment proceedings” were beginning as he filed “a petition to get secret grand jury information from the Mueller report. But Monday’s filing in a separate case looking to compel testimony from former White House counsel Don McGahn suggested that it had already started on March 4 — weeks before Mueller sent his report to Attorney General William Barr on March 22,” according to Fox News.

“On March 4, 2019, the Judiciary Committee opened an investigation into ‘threats to the rule of law,’ encompassing alleged obstruction of justice, public corruption and other abuses of power by President Trump, his associates, and members of his Administration,” the filing stated, going on to say that “one critical purpose of the Committee’s investigation is to determine whether to recommend articles of impeachment against the President.”

However, Mueller and The Office of the Special Counsel did not file their report until March 25th. The motion filed on Monday pushed for a summary judgement or preliminary injunction, which would force McGahn to testify. He has refused to testify previously when served with a committee subpoena, insisting that he has immunity. According to Fox News, “The March 4 date is in line with an Aug. 1 op-ed for the South Florida Sun-Sentinel by Rep. Ted Deutsche, D-Fla., but it is in stark contrast with previous claims from the Democratic leadership.”

The Washington Post published an interview on March 11th in which Pelosi said, “Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country.” Monday’s court filing reveals that Democrats had already been making moves in this direction a week before the interview was released.

Via Fox News:
It was early August when Nadler first told CNN that “formal impeachment proceedings” were taking place, at the same time that he was initiating the case for the secret grand jury material. In May he said during a WNYC radio appearance that “there certainly is” justification for Congress to begin impeachment proceedings against Trump, but that it was critical for the American public to agree before launching the process.

“We’re going to have to have the investigation,” Nadler said in response to a question from a caller, adding that he was going to talk to colleagues about the possibility of a formal impeachment inquiry. In May, Nadler was sure to note the difference between a “formal impeachment inquiry” and “holding hearings outside the context of a formal inquiry,” according to Fox. Nadler made note of “functional differences” between “holding hearings in an official impeachment investigation and doing so without one, including ‘legal powers that we wouldn’t have without it,’” Fox explains.

Note that we are assuming Pelosi knew about this. As Speaker of The House and essentially leader of the party, I think she must have been aware. It looks to me like she and Nadler and trying to the good ol’ “good cop, bad cop’ routine. What they fail to realize is you actually need a good cop to make it work …