While I hate this term but the "Second husband Doug Emhoff" was asked about reports from DailyMail.com that he hit one his ex-girlfriend some years ago, reports that have not been picked up by most other outlets of the so called Main Stream News media. OR Fake News as we really know them and so it would not shock most when these things go un checked. Now had this been Trump or one of his sons the full arm of the OBAMA/BIDEN/HARRIS DOJ would want to put them in the electric chair.
So this guy doesn't get how politics works and he's saying “[Trump’s] spreading it about you, saying that tabloid stories about your personal life. He’s saying it should be front and center. He’s saying it about your wife and making incredibly crude and lewd suggestions about her past life. I’m just curious, I know I seem like a very zen, mindful person, but I think I’d be pissed off, and I’m just wondering, how do you all stay centered, how do you stay disciplined and not really go off and not really push back hard at these things?” MSNBC “Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough asked. “We don’t have time to be p***ed off,” Emhoff responded without denying the report. “We don’t have time to focus on it. It’s all a distraction. It’s designed to try to get us off our game.” “Does it get you off your game?” Scarborough replied. But wait these are the same people who constantly call Trump Hitler! These people have done actual harm to Trump using a biased leftist court system and say they will do more if he wins and is elected 47th! These radical leftists MUST BE STOPPED!
“No. All we are doing all we talk about is this election,” Emhoff said. “We understand the stakes, we understand the responsibility,” he added. “Our very country, our future what kind of future are we going to have, who would you like picking the next three Supreme Court justices? The guy who picked the three who overturned Roe v. Wade and want to take away more freedom?” Previously, a spokesperson for Emhoff simply called the report “untrue.” Yeah our country is at stake Doug but from the grips of you're continued radicals side need to keep power they will do anything to not allow the WILL of the people who vote to be the final voice.
Also this just in folks the talk is that if Donald Trump beats Kamala Harris at the polls following the Nov. 5 election, he will likely face an even tougher opponent in court: her campaign attorney, Marc Elias. According to RealClearInvestigation’s Paul Sperry, the seasoned Democratic Party attorney has filed more than 60 pre-election lawsuits aimed at preventing Trump from being elected again. His filings target what he describes as Republican “voter suppression” tactics, such as requiring voters to present identification at polling stations. Echoing a common Democratic position, Elias argues that these measures are “racist” strategies designed to make it more difficult for minority voters to cast their ballots.
“At the same time, Elias has been sending letters to election officials in Georgia and other key swing states threatening legal action if they uphold challenges to voter rolls to remove non citizens and other ineligible registrants,” Sperry writes. “Some Georgia officials complain that his intimidation tactics are interfering with county registrars’ ability to check the qualifications of voters. So this means they plan on helping to RIG the election for the left by making it so ANYONE could vote even illegals or "non citizens" and "New Comers"? This is clear as day as there is when it comes to election result interference which makes me ask the question! Who is now acting like a "Dictator" who won't let go of power? The left... This is all the clear proof you need that they're communists trying to take over the country. Using the courts, and lies, and weaponizing the DOJ, FBI, CIA, and turning the country over to our foreign enemies.
“If Trump is declared the winner, the hard-charging attorney threatens to overturn his election by deploying an army of more than 75 lawyers to sue for ballot recounts in several swing states,” Sperry noted further. “Trump, in turn, has threatened to lock Elias up for election interference, as ABC News moderator David Muir pointed out in last month’s presidential debate between Trump and Kamala Harris.” Elias exemplifies the increasing role of “lawfare” in U.S. elections, as both major parties increasingly rely on the courts to gain a competitive advantage, Sperry’s report noted. A recently released Republican National Committee memo reveals the campaign has enlisted thousands of lawyers to counter what a Trump attorney anticipates will be an “onslaught of litigation” from the Harris campaign challenging the election outcomes.
Naturally, this extensive legal team is also prepared to initiate recounts if Trump does not secure a victory, the report said. The Trump campaign has filed or joined 123 election-related lawsuits across 26 states, with 82 of these cases in battleground states, aiming to address what they term voter fraud.
They can't win a fair election fight against Donald Trump so this entire year up to the election they have him in court on baseless bogus trials and we all can see the clown show these trials are but if this sort of election fraud and interference by these evil leftist cult like swamp creatures wasn't enough! NOW thankfully to an intelligent Judge the latest act of ELECTION RIGGING Was denied!
A federal judge in Wisconsin has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to remove the witness requirement for absentee voting in the major swing state. On Thursday U.S. District Judge James Peterson ruled against the lawsuit brought by the law firm of Marc Elias, a Democrat elections attorney, that sought to get rid of the requirement, Just The News reported. “Elias Law Group argued that the witness requirement violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and Civil Rights Act of 1964,” the report said. “According to the court’s opinion, ‘the most obvious problem’ with the attorneys’ argument ‘is that it simply does not make any sense,’” it said.
The judge ruled that if the plaintiff’s interpretation of the law were to be followed that it would mean that “every witness would have to determine the voter’s age, residence, citizenship, criminal history, whether the voter is unable or unwilling to vote in person, whether the voter has voted at another location or is planning to do so, whether the voter is capable of understanding the objective of the voting process, whether the voter is under a guardianship, and, if so, whether a court has determined that the voter is competent.”
The judge said that the “absurd results to which” the arguments “would lead are reason enough to reject” them. Derek Lyons, the president of the elections integrity group RITE, celebrated the decision. “Since its founding in 2022, RITE has been extremely active in Wisconsin and is proud to have made yet another contribution to the integrity of elections in that state. It’s essential that people voting by mail follow the law in doing so, and Wisconsin has implemented a witness signature requirement that helps ensure they do just that. This case marks another example of liberal activists’ transparent and shameful efforts to co-opt important civil rights legislation for their partisan agendas. Sadly, it is all too clear that these activists are more interested in making unfounded accusations than in ensuring impartial and accurate elections,” he said.
The press release from the group went on to explain its stance. “In a Thursday evening ruling, a federal court in Wisconsin denied liberal activist attorney Marc Elias’s effort to block the state from enforcing its longstanding requirement that mail voters have a witness confirm their compliance with the state’s voting laws. This continues a losing streak for Elias in his efforts to distort the Materiality Provision of the venerable Civil Rights Act into a tool to undermine America’s elections. At the end of March, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals similarly rejected his effort to use the same law to block Pennsylvania from enforcing its requirement that voters sign and date their mail ballots. The three judges who decisively rejected his arguments in these two cases were all appointed by Democrat Presidents,” it said.
“The court’s opinion is a decisive rejection of Elias’s ill-conceived legal argument. As the Court put it, “the most obvious problem” with the argument “is that it simply does not make any sense.” The court later added that the “absurd results to which” his arguments “would lead are reason enough to reject” them. The court also emphasized the importance of the Third Circuit’s recent unequivocal rejection of his out-of-the-mainstream theories, observing that the “Third Circuit’s reasoning is persuasive” as it comprehensively ‘explains why the statute’s text, legislative history, and logic all support an interpretation that the Materiality Provision does not apply to ballot preparation,’” the group said.
“The defeated litigants have twenty-nine days to decide if they want to test their arguments with the Court of Appeals. RITE will continue to defend election law in Wisconsin, as necessary,” it said. Honest Elections Project Executive Director Jason Snead also praised the decision. “A federal judge has officially thrown out a lawsuit filed by Left-wing attorney Marc Elias challenging a key election integrity provision requiring absentee ballot signature verification, exposing his radical legal strategy to flood the zone with dozens of frivolous lawsuits,” he said. “The plaintiff’s theory in this case was yet another example of Elias and the left twisting old statutes to attack modern ballot safeguards,” the executive director said. “In this case, they asked a court to conclude that requiring a witness signature on a mail ballot was illegal vouching under the Voting Rights Act.
“In the Jim Crow era, many places required a registered voter to vouch for the qualifications of a new voter in order to prevent African Americans from voting. Obviously, that law was not intended to prevent widely used election integrity measures for mail ballots. Fortunately, common sense prevailed, and an Obama appointed judge agreed, wisely dismissing the case,” he said. But the Jim Crow era is over and elections need to be fair and free for us who have the right to vote, and are registered to vote. By the left trying this it's so they can have the MILLIONS of illegals Joe Biden and his open borders have allowed in the last 4 years.
They have been at this for this entire year.... This is just the latest unlawful leftist move in this state.
The video here on top showed how they tried to do this to hurt the GOP race early on and help remove Donald Trump which failed... Don't read anything other into this than what it is. This is clear election fraud and interference once again attempted pre-election by DEMOCRATS to RIG another election. Period.
