Boy the alphabet people and their liberal congress butt buddies are not going to like this but it looks like the team Dodge did it again friends. Turns out that the USDA got rid of 420 grants for a savings of $2.3 billion, according to DOGE. Among the programs the money was used for, $361,000 went toward "gender non-conforming, non-binary, two-spirit" BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and people of color) farmers in New York. We kid you not and if you are not clear as to what these people are getting paid to produce neither does anyone else.
In a post on X, the Elon Musk-led group said it got rid of the contracts, which have a ceiling value of $250 million and a savings of $70 million. The problem contracts included a $14,000 commitment by the Department of Health and Human Services for an "executive transformational leadership training program." Another was a $5.2 million contract with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, the human resources agency for the federal government, to "provide strategic advisory and assistance to improve and transform current processes and organizational systems".
DOGE recently announced $51 million in cuts from the U.S. African Development Foundation, which included hundreds of thousands of dollars for marketing shea butter and pineapple juice, as well as mango drying facilities. The group was created in an effort to slash government waste and provide additional transparency in government spending. It recently helped the U.S. Coast Guard save $32.7 million by eliminating an "ineffective IT program" known as the Logistics Information Management System.
Americans recently shared mixed reviews of the transparency group. Fox News Digital conducted interviews in Knoxville, Tennessee; Washington, D.C.; Detroit; and Houston, where citizens provided reactions and graded its ongoing efforts. Some criticized DOGE for "trying to do their job with a sledgehammer," while others praised the group for looking into government waste. Nearly half of all layoffs so far in 2025 have been driven by cuts related to the Department of Government Efficiency’s (DOGE) efforts to slash government funding and reduce the size of the federal workforce, according to a new report from outplacement firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas.
The report shows that “DOGE Actions” led to 283,172 job cuts in the first four months of 2025, and “DOGE Downstream Impact” was cited as the reason for another 6,945 job losses, which the report indicates largely come from non-profits and education organizations. Together, that accounts for 48 percent of all job cuts announced so far this year. The vast majority of job cuts related to “DOGE Actions” occurred in March, which saw 216,670 positions cut. Government job cuts last month also accounted for the vast majority of layoffs across all sectors, which totaled 275,240 in March. In April, job cuts attributed to DOGE plummeted, with just 2,919 announced cuts attributed to the government cost-cutting initiative spearheaded by tech billionaire Elon Musk.
But April still saw a high number of job cuts — 105,441 — the highest level since April 2020, which was the highest month ever recorded by the outplacement firm, which began reporting on job cuts in 1989. Reasons given for April cuts include “Market/Economic Conditions” and tariffs and restructuring. “Though the Government cuts are front and center, we saw job cuts across sectors last month. Generally, companies are citing the economy and new technology,” said Andrew Challenger, the firm’s senior vice president. “Employers are slow to hire and limiting hiring plans as they wait and see what will happen with trade, supply chain, and consumer spending.” Gross domestic product shrank during the first quarter of 2025 as a surge of imports ahead of President Trump’s tariffs, which he announced in March and later delayed for 90 days, hit economic growth calculations.
Elon Musk had let it be known as of a few weeks ago that in May he would step back a bit from Doge to focus on Tesla and Space X and on Tuesday he re confirmed that he does indeed plan to dramatically scale back his work for the Department of Government Efficiency starting in May and turn his attention more fully to automaker Tesla, which just reported a 71% drop in net profit for the first quarter. After all these morons on the liberal left started to burn the cars, and trucks, and key them and what not.
But he said that “I think I’ll continue to spend a day or two per week on government matters for as long as [President Donald Trump] would like me to do, and as long as it is useful. But starting next month, I’ll be allocating far more of my time to Tesla,” Musk also said in opening remarks at an audio cast Q&A after Tesla’s March quarter numbers were announced.
The billionaire, who is the world’s richest individual according to Forbes, noted blow back against his role at DOGE, a new entity launched by Donald Trump to unearth what it says are billions of dollars of fraud and abuse in government. Tesla sales have been slumping in the U.S. and abroad and there have been ongoing incidents of Tesla vehicles being vandalized. Tesla showrooms have been targeted by protesters as DOGE has gutted federal departments and agencies, resulting in thousands of layoffs and glitches in critical services. Many DOGE initiatives are being challenged in courts in multiple lawsuits.
A report in early April by job placement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas said more than 280,000 layoffs across 27 agencies over previous two months were linked to DOGE efforts. And as we found out these layoff were all of people who literally did nothing for their pay and were all DEI hired by liberals. So this is a good thing we did here folks. Justified since these people when asked what was their job they couldn't answer it.
“There’s been some blow back for time [spent] in government with the Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE,” Musk said. “I think the work that we’re doing there is actually very important to rein in the deficit that is leading our country … to destruction. And the DOGE team has made a lot of progress in addressing waste and fraud. But [there’s] a natural blow back from … those who were receiving the wasteful dollars and the fraudulent dollars.” They “will try to attack me and anything associated with me,” he said. Musk said he thinks much of the heavy lifting at DOGE is done, allowing “my time allocation … to drop significantly.” He said he will continue to be involved in DOGE likely for “the remainder of the President’s term, just make sure that the waste and fraud that we stopped does not come roaring back.”
He reassured Tesla shareholders, who have knocked the stock lower this year, that despite the weak quarter the company has “been through many near death experiences … and this is not one of those times … not even close.” He also called tariffs implemented by the Trump administration on U.S. global trading partners “tough” on the company. Many U.S. cars and even more auto parts come from overseas. “I just want to emphasize that the tariff decision is entirely up to the President of the United States. I will weigh in with my advice, with the President.
He will listen to my advice, but then it’s up to him to make this decision. I’ve been on the record many times as saying that I believe lower tariffs are generally a good idea for prosperity, but this decision is finally up to the elected representative of the people, being the President of the United States.
So, I’ll continue to advocate for lower tariffs rather than higher tariffs, but that’s all I can do.” Also just because Elon is taking less time working with Doge and might step away all together the department is set and it's NOT going away it just means it's got the people in place who are doing the work, and so he can step back and work on Tesla and Space X, and those big Fucking Rockets we all love!
Words have meaning folks and well it looks like one of Governor Tim Walz's state employees took tampon Timmy's words to heart and now Dylan Bryan Adams, 33, was arrested on suspicion of causing over $20,000 in damages to Tesla in Minneapolis. Formal charges are pending but things are pretty solid as he's recorded as having done this and the funny connection is he works for Tampon Timmy and we all know Tesla cars have cameras everywhere and so this guy doing this shows how arrogant, and dumb these people are.
Employee of Governor Tim Walz Arrested For Vandalizing Tesla Vehicles, Oh Boy |
This specific example wasn't on my bingo card.
In Minnesota, vandalizing individual Tesla vehicles would most likely result in criminal damage to property charges under Minn. Stat. § 609.595, with… pic.twitter.com/HRhk2KgkC5
— Andrea Shaffer, Employment/Labor Law (@Andreafreedom76) April 19, 2025
Seriously we can't make up how idiotic these people are right now with this TDS, and EMDS... But this guys going to get to go sit in a prison cell for a long while to re-think his soyboy tampon loving life. He will need Tampons from all the bleeders he's about to have in Prison for the next few. Enjoy the time as the POKE there guy... But let's make him world famous for his idiotic mind shall we? LOL Enjoy! Maybe they should put him in with Diddy?
Elon Musk Claims US Institute Of Peace Deleted 'Terabyte' Of Data To 'Cover Their Crimes' which folks lead up to them handing MILLIONS of dollars over to the Taliban! Now this is incredible as these people were busted deleting a Terabyte worth of data which was records showing where the money went. Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), said all this on Wednesday Musk made the accusation while responding to a post detailing the efforts made by DOGE and law enforcement agencies to uncover fraud at the think tank. The USIP is a government-funded organisation focused on preventing and resolving global conflicts.
Elon claimed that despite USIP’s attempt to erase crucial data, DOGE had successfully recovered the information. DOGE is an initiative formed during Donald Trump’s second term, aimed at reducing public sector spending. “They deleted a terabyte of financial data to cover their crimes, but they don’t understand technology, so we recovered it," Musk said on X. The post that Musk responded to outlined how DOGE, with assistance from the FBI and Metro Police, fought for days to access the US Institute of Peace’s records. “The DOGE team fought for days to gain access to the United States Institute of Peace. Eventually, with help from the FBI and Metro Police DOGE was able to access the agency and discovered massive fraud, waste and abuse-including payments to Taliban and Iraq," the post read.
DOGE: The DOGE team fought for days to gain access to the United States Institute of Peace. Eventually, with help from the FBI and Metro Police DOGE was able to access the agency and discovered massive fraud, waste and abuse-including payments to Taliban and Iraq. pic.twitter.com/VymOebovfY
Reposting the user’s post with a comment, Musk also took the opportunity to mock the USIP, saying, “Any government institution is most likely to be the opposite of its name." The US Institute of Peace was established during former US President Ronald Reagan’s administration. According to a description on usa.gov, the USIP “promotes research, policy analysis, education, and training on international peace and conflict resolution in an effort to prevent and resolve violent conflicts, and to promote post-conflict stability." However, its official website has since been taken down.
In February, US President Donald Trump had signed an executive order aimed at reducing the size of the Federal Government, including actions against the US Institute of Peace, which is now under DOGE’s purview. The order had stated the goal of increasing accountability within government institutions. George Foote, who served as counsel to the USIP till he was dismissed by DOGE, is now involved in legal proceedings seeking to prevent the dismissal of top officials at the institute. Foote is challenging the legality of DOGE’s actions in court.
The Pentagon has NEVER passed an audit and our government cannot pass an audit but We The People are audited for $5 we received we can't account for? The double standards are outrageous and do no much harm to us the people who have been forced to foot the bill for the wasted money and fraud spending, and black budget projects. These agencies/departments that haven’t passed an audit, EVER, need to be closed down immediately! If their work is vital, send it to another agency.
With approximately 450 agencies/departments, we could lose 80% and still function fine.
According to Bloomberg’s Anthony Carpaccio, the Department of Defense made $35 trillion in “accounting adjustments” in 2019, easily surpassing the $30.7 trillion in such adjustments recorded in 2018. Carpaccio notes that the number “dwarfs the $738 billion of defense-related funding in the latest U.S. budget, a spending plan that includes the most expensive weapons systems in the world including the F-35 jet as well as new aircraft carriers, destroyers and submarines.” It’s also “larger than the entire U.S. economy and underscores the Defense Department’s continuing difficulty in balancing its books.”
So what are these accounting adjustments? Todd Harrison of the Center for Strategic and International Studies says they represent “a lot of double, triple, and quadruple counting of the same money as it got moved between accounts” within the Pentagon. “A lot” may be an understatement: According to government data, there were 562,568 adjustments made in the Pentagon’s books in 2018. Why it matters: More broadly, the number highlights the persistent lack of internal financial controls at the Pentagon, which makes it extremely difficult to account properly for spending in the largest government budget. “Although it gets scant public attention compared with airstrikes, troop deployments, sexual assault statistics or major weapons programs, the reliability of the Pentagon’s financial statement is an indication of how effectively the military manages its resources considering that it receives over half of discretionary domestic spending,” Carpaccio says.
Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA), who asked the Government Accountability Office to look into the issue, said the “combined errors, shorthand, and sloppy record-keeping by DoD accountants do add up to a number nearly 1.5 times the size of the U.S. economy,” and charged that the Pentagon “employs accounting adjustments like a contractor paints over mold. Their priority is making the situation look manageable, not solving the underlying problem.”
With that many agencies/departments, they don’t talk to each other, share info, and are WAY TOO involved in our daily lives.
Our Founding Fathers created a SMALL, LIMITED government, not the huge mega employer. (The largest employer in the US is the federal government, think about that one). Most of the black hole the money entered is literally going to black budget projects dealing with other worldly Tech. YES UFO's/UAP's are involved in getting this lost money. A LOT went to companies like Lockheed Martin and other members of the companies used to create things from crashed found and traded to us "UFO'S" or SPACE CRAFTS from Other worlds. Our service members have a very special place in how this country runs, but I’d cancel the Pentagon’s funding (with the exception of pay for service members) if they cannot account for the Trillions for decades which add up to the $35 TRILLION (that would essentially pay off our National debt). Just think the tech they are hiding from us?
This is what lead to a more formal UFO/UAP disclosure and it's no secret why it's going to be Doge and ELON doing this! He of SPACE X after all would be the ideal person under the leadership of Donald Trump our President to make these records make sense, and dig as deep as needed to expose it all. This is where the fun begins.
So a liberal Judge in New York has put a temporary hold on Elon Musk, and President Trump + DOGE’s Treasury Access.! All this after we find out where the waste of the USAID money is going and liberals are up in arms cause the end of the gravy train is done, and so here Are All The Major Lawsuits Against Trump. Question is what is the left so scared about huh?
A New York judge has temporarily barred Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from accessing a sensitive Treasury payment system, after over a dozen Democratic states sued late Friday the latest in a slew of legal actions as Democrats and others fight President Donald Trump and cost-cutting Elon Musk in court. But what are these people so scared about? Hmmm Remember these activist DA's like Letitia James are known to go and get whatever they want from Liberal Judges and this is who "Judge Paul Englemayer" is and it's no different than the people used against the Trials vs Trump before he won re election. They're always going to find a way to lie, cheat and steal with these liberal NY Judges... Simple as that. This is part of the corruption these liberals keep hiding in.
Feb. 8Judge Paul Engelmayer ruled political appointees and “special government employees”—like members of Musk’s team—must be cut of from access from the Treasury’s systems until another New York-based judge can rule on the issue next week.
Engelmeyer’s ruling came after a group of 19 Democratic state attorneys general sued Trump over DOGE’s Treasury access, arguing the move put personal information at risk, exceeded Treasury’s legal authority and could lead to DOGE unconstitutionally blocking spending that’s already been approved by Congress (a court order in a separate lawsuit said only two DOGE staffers can have read-only access).
Feb. 7A group of states that sued Trump over last week’s sweeping federal grant freeze alleged in a filing they “continue to be denied access to federal funds” even though a judge put the freeze on hold, claiming “scattershot outages” have cut them off from accessing several Biden-era grant programs.
Feb. 7Judge Carl Nichols—, a Trump appointee, blocked a plan to put 2,200 U.S. Agency for International Development staff on paid leave as of Friday, part of Trump’s gambit to wind down the foreign aid agency, multiplenews outlets reported—a temporary reprieve following a lawsuit by a federal employees’ union calling Trump’s efforts to dismantle USAID without Congress’ permission “unconstitutional and illegal.”
Feb. 7The Justice Department agreed to not name the FBI agents involved in the Jan. 6 investigation before a judge rules on two lawsuits from FBI agents that argued the dissemination of the agents’ names could threaten their employment, reputation and wellbeing.
Feb. 7The University of California Student Association sued the Department of Education accusing Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency of illegally accessing “sensitive personal and financial information” of about 42 million federal student loan borrowers.
Feb. 6Boston-based Judge George O’Toole paused a Thursday deadline for over 2 million federal employees to accept a buyout offer—part of Trump and Musk’s cost-cutting push—as he considers whether to grant a request by federal workers’ unions who sued to block the buyouts, extending the deadline until Monday.
Feb. 6Judge John Coughenour in Seattle extended his pause on Trump’s day-one executive order rescinding birthright citizenship for the children of undocumented or temporary immigrants, in response to a lawsuit brought by Democratic-led states, writing, “The president cannot change, limit, or qualify this Constitutional right via an executive order.”
Feb. 6D.C.-based Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly said only two Musk-affiliated staffers can access the Treasury Department’s payment system on a “read only” basis, after workers’ unions sued the Treasury amid reports Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency accessed sensitive records. (One of the employees given access has reportedly since resigned over racist tweets.)
Feb. 5A second judge —Deborah L. Boardman of Maryland—blocked Trump’s policy rescinding birthright citizenship, in response to a lawsuit brought by nonprofits representing undocumented pregnant women.
Feb. 4Judge Royce C. Lamberth in D.C. paused Trump’s restrictions on transgender women being incarcerated in women’s prisons and federal prisons providing gender-affirming medical treatment, after multiple inmates sued to block the policy.
Feb. 3District Judge Loren L. Alikhan broadly blocked the Trump administration’s memo halting almost all federal assistance—even after the White House claimed it had been rescinded—while litigation brought by nonprofit groups that receive government funds moves forward.
Jan. 31The Trump administration’s memo pausing most federal assistance was partially blocked, as Judge John J. McConnell Jr. ruled the Trump administration cannot withhold funding from the Democratic-led states that sued to block the funding freeze.
Jan. 26O’Toole prohibited law enforcement from transferring an incarcerated transgender woman to a male prison facility—at least while litigation filed by the inmate moves forward—after Trump stripped transgender Americans of their legal protections, including being incarcerated at prisons aligned with their gender identities.
Jan. 23Coughenour paused Trump’s order rescinding birthright citizenship, the first major ruling against the second Trump administration.
Jan. 20The first lawsuit against Trump’s administration was filed minutes after he was sworn into office, as public interest law group National Security Counselors argued DOGE should be classified as a federal advisory board that has “fairly balanced” membership and follows public transparency rules.
Lawsuits have been filed against a number of other Trump administration directives in cases that haven’t resulted in any rulings yet, including pending cases on Trump’s immigration policies like asylum restrictions, raids on sanctuary cities, immigration officers entering houses of worship, and restricting grants to immigration-related groups. Multiple other transgender rights-focused cases are pending, including litigation against Trump’s transgender military ban and minors receiving gender-affirming care, as well as a lawsuit challenging Trump’s broader restrictions on diversity, equity and inclusion policies. Other lawsuits that are still pending include litigation against the Justice Department targeting agents who worked on Jan. 6-related cases, Trump’s “Schedule F” that makes it easier to fire career civil servants, Trump’s firing of National Labor Relations Board member Gwynne A. Wilcox, the Office of Personnel Management allegedly storing emails on an unsecured server and the government removing health data from federal websites.
Multiple lawsuits are also arguing Trump should not have been able to create Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” by renaming the U.S. Digital Service, while another challenge takes aim at DOGE accessing records at the Department of Labor.
None of the lawsuits against the second Trump administration have yet made it to the Supreme Court, though at least some inevitably will. The high stakes of the lawsuits brought against Trump policies, plus the fact that bringing multiple lawsuits against a single policy may result in conflicting rulings, makes it all but certain the high court will eventually weigh in on some of the legal challenges that are now making their way through the courts. It’s unclear how the 6-3 conservative court, stacked with three Trump appointees, will ultimately rule on any challenges, though legal experts have suggested some of the administration’s moves may be too much for even the conservative-leaning court to get behind. Georgetown Law School professor Stephen Vladeck wrote he was skeptical the Supreme Court would back the administration’s memo halting federal funding, for instance. He noted that while the court was willing to give Trump more power in its recent decision giving him some immunity from criminal charges, it would be “quite another” thing for them to give him “the right to refuse to spend any and all money Congress appropriates.”
Legal experts have also been highly skeptical of the legal justification the Trump administration has used to justify the order nullifying birthright citizenship, which claims the 14th Amendment which guarantees citizenship to “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” has always exempted the children of undocumented immigrants or non citizens. Mark Krikorian, who runs the Center for Immigration Studies and supports ending birthright citizenship, acknowledged to NBC News in July Trump’s argument is “something that the Supreme Court may well decide against,” and legal experts have previously decried the legal theory behind Trump’s order as a “lunatic fringe argument,” with University of Massachusetts, Amherst, professor Rebecca Hamlin telling NPR in 2018 that any lawyer who believes it is “like a unicorn.”
Trump has already issued a number of major executive actions, and many have not yet been challenged in court, such as him pulling out of the World Health Organization, withholding federal funding from schools that allow transgender women in women’s sports, imposing tariffs on China, removing safeguards around artificial intelligence, and rescinding Biden-era climate change initiatives, including ordering federal agencies not to disburse some funding that was approved by Congress. Musk and DOGE have also undertaken a number of controversial moves that haven’t yet resulted in court action, including DOGE staffers accessing information for Medicare and Medicaid and reportedly using artificial intelligence to search through sensitive internal data for the Department of Education.
Trump has issued a slew of executive orders in the less than three weeks he’s been in the White House, issuing broad orders on issues such as climate change, transgender rights, DEI initiatives, education, immigration, the U.S. military, abortion, the federal death penalty and more. Musk, whom Trump appointed to lead DOGE and has become one of his top advisers, has also drawn widespread controversy as DOGE has burrowed into the federal government and gained access to government information while proposing widespread cuts to spending. With Republicans holding both the White House and control of Congress, the courts have become the primary way for Democrats to issue any sort of check on the Trump administration’s actions, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., has pointed to litigation as a key pillar of Democrats’ response to the second Trump presidency. “We’ve seen a flood and an avalanche of outrageous executive actions that have been taken by the administration and by the current president, but that has also prompted a response of righteous litigation,” Jeffries told MSNBC when asked how Democrats would oppose Trump’s policies, saying the litigation strategy “will continue as we move forward.”
Trump has already issued a number of major executive actions, and many have not yet been challenged in court, such as him pulling out of the World Health Organization, withholding federal funding from schools that allow transgender women in women’s sports, imposing tariffs on China, removing safeguards around artificial intelligence, and rescinding Biden-era climate change initiatives, including ordering federal agencies not to disburse some funding that was approved by Congress. Musk and DOGE have also undertaken a number of controversial moves that haven’t yet resulted in court action, including DOGE staffers accessing information for Medicare and Medicaid and reportedly using artificial intelligence to search through sensitive internal data for the Department of Education.
Trump has issued a slew of executive orders in the less than three weeks he’s been in the White House, issuing broad orders on issues such as climate change, transgender rights, DEI initiatives, education, immigration, the U.S. military, abortion, the federal death penalty and more. Musk, whom Trump appointed to lead DOGE and has become one of his top advisers, has also drawn widespread controversy as DOGE has burrowed into the federal government and gained access to government information while proposing widespread cuts to spending. With Republicans holding both the White House and control of Congress, the courts have become the primary way for Democrats to issue any sort of check on the Trump administration’s actions, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., has pointed to litigation as a key pillar of Democrats’ response to the second Trump presidency. “We’ve seen a flood and an avalanche of outrageous executive actions that have been taken by the administration and by the current president, but that has also prompted a response of righteous litigation,” Jeffries told MSNBC when asked how Democrats would oppose Trump’s policies, saying the litigation strategy “will continue as we move forward.”
